FCC Logo - Return to the FCC Home Page
Office of Engineering and Technology

  

Print This Window
There have been 7 comment(s) made on this document:
  • OET Info commented on 2022-03-31 10:28:14.25:
    Comment Uploaded by FCC in behalf MetaPower: MetaPower -- Comments in Response to Draft WPT KDB -- FINAL -- 03.21.22.pdf View attachment associated with this comment

  • OET Info commented on 2022-03-31 10:05:07.773:
    Comment Uploaded by FCC in behalf MetaPower: MetaPower -- Comments in Response to Draft WPT KDB -- FINAL -- 03.21.22.pdf

  • OET Info commented on 2022-03-31 10:00:19.676:
    Comment Uploaded by FCC in behalf of Ossia’s: Comments of Ossia Inc..pdf View attachment associated with this comment

  • oet info commented on 2022-03-31 09:51:53.606:
    Comment Uploaded by FCC in behalf of GuRu’s GuRu’s comments on draft KDP(54870606.1).pdf View attachment associated with this comment

  • OET Info commented on 2022-03-31 09:38:48.983:
    Comment Uploaded by FCC in behalf of Energous Corporation: Energous WPT KDB Comments (3.21.22)-c3.pdf View attachment associated with this comment

  • Matthew Silbernagel commented on 2022-03-20 10:44:38.286:
    Thank you for opening up the opportunity to share comments in regards to the changes, as well as making changes to the regulations that allow for more freedom in development. As helpful as the changes are, the IVO team as well as industry partners have ideas on how the changes could be even more helpful. (1.) Implementation of a "catch-all" plan to allow for a case by case review of proposed wireless products. Innovation by nature requires a certain amount of outside the box thinking. A "catch-all" would allow for a company to possibly be granted a waiver if a new project may not fit perfectly into the existing guidelines. Currently the regulations work very well in regards to conventional wireless charging utilizing magnetic inductance but leave room for other forms of wireless power technology to be overlooked. IVO Ltd. has developed a method to transmit power wirelessly utilizing the electric field but has suffered under the current regulations as they are not a one size fits all solution. One way to implement this would be to allow manufacturers to conduct transactions with other manufacturers in a business to business setting during the review process, and only ceasing to transact if the review comes back rejected. Not being able to fit the current regulations comes with an obvious economic penalty which will dampen future innovation. (2.) Another area for improvement would be amending the rule that restricts to "indoor use only". Advancements in wireless power technology has led to an increase in possible uses outside of just consumer electronics. Electric vehicles, unmanned vehicles or even charging small electronics over greater distances would require more freedom to develop outside the confines of a building. With our presidential administration's plan to bolster EV charging infrastructure and pushing advancements through the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act clearly shows the desire to truly advance the American use of future technologies. IVO Ltd. has developed wireless charging solutions that could be utilized to further advance the EV infrastructure as well as increasing the scope of use for unmanned vehicles. Respectfully, The IVO Ltd. Team

  • Rene Hamer commented on 2022-03-18 17:01:35.686:
    Please see attached comment. Thank you. View attachment associated with this comment

Note: It is important to understand that the staff guidance provided in the KDB is intended to assist the public in following Commission requirements and does not constitute rules. Accordingly, the guidance is not binding on the Commission and will not prevent the Commission from making a different decision in any matter that comes to its attention for resolution.