• Robert He commented on 2015-05-08 01:46:09.88:
  Dear FCC officer, My name is robert,from lenovo's lab which is located in China. I understand FCC's position that MRA’s should be the preferred method of recognizing laboratories and facilitating trade among economies. But, I strongly recommend that FCC should develop new procedures to recognize labs that are located in non-MRA countries . Thanks! BR robert

---

• Adam Gouker commented on 2015-05-01 11:10:55.603:
  Please refer to attached 1 page letter containing 5 comments on this draft KDB. View attachment associated with this comment

---

• David Case commented on 2015-04-21 15:27:58.37:
  In regards to lab accreditation I believe it that it should be up to A2LA or NVLAP to determine which scope a lab is accredited for as manufacturer labs may have either the need or bandwidth to be able to be accredited to a limited general scope for say all P:Art 15 devices. The TCB can then make the determination in regards to accepting the accreditation or not. In regards perhaps the accreditation smaller subsets if more structured overall one size fit all approach is choses, In that case I suggest something like this. 1) In regards to Part 15 intentional radiators suggest dividing up as follow A) Part 15 devices under 26 GHz B) Part 15 devices above 26 GHz C) Part 15 RLAN (15.247 / Part 15.407 D) Part 15 D UPCS 3) Licensed services – Mobile Part 20,22, 24,27, 4) Licensed services – General mobile radio part 90, 95, 101 5) Licensed services – Broadcast, marine, Aviation 6) RF exposure - A) RF E field measurements and studies B) SAR As an alternate consider placing RF E-Field measurement and studies under the various RF measurement standards for the above services and rules would also suffice..

---

• Vina Kerai commented on 2015-04-15 08:48:48.713:
  TUV SUD BABT hereby request the following scope "Licensed Devices Radio Service Rule Part" is refined to something similar to the following:- Cellular (Commercial/Public Mobile/PCS/Misc-Part 27) Satellite Radio Broadcast Experimental Radio, Auxiliary, Special Broadcast and other Maritime Aeronautical Private Land Mobile & Personal Radio Services Amateur Microwave (Part 101)

---

• Mike Zhou commented on 2015-04-12 22:02:46.55:
  Dear FCC, How are you~ This is Mike from Huawei China. I concern about the article 5. Accreditation Requirements---Foreign Accredited Testing Laboratories mostly. It seems that if the laboratory is located outside of the United States, first should determine whether the country have signed MRA with the U.S.A, if no MRA, no need to check the second requirment because of no MRA. So the laboratory in China will not accepted, am i right? Thank you very much~ Sincerely Mike

---

Note: It is important to understand that the staff guidance provided in the KDB is intended to assist the public in following Commission requirements and does not constitute rules. Accordingly, the guidance is not binding on the Commission and will not prevent the Commission from making a different decision in any matter that comes to its attention for resolution.