FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Mosaic ATM

Address
Attention: Mr. Chris Brinton
Street Address: 540 Fort Evans Rd. NE, Ste. 300
P.O. Box:
City: Leesburg
State: VA
Zip Code: 20176
Country:
E-Mail Address: cbrinton@mosaicatm.com

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Bagnall
First Name: Timothy
Title: Principal Analyst
Phone Number: 3034444403

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
This request for an STA is related to one previously granted by the FCC. Call sign: WT9XWB. File Number: 1684-EX-ST-2022. (Also previously File Number: 0794-EX-ST-2022). This request updates the area of operation for the two mobile stations, increasing the radius only slightly. This is the only change. Text below is verbatim from the previous application. This request focuses on two new locations and expands the operational use of the radio to include airborne operations. Airborne operations would be extremely limited – in duration and location - and carefully planned and conducted by the Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership (MAAP), an FAA-designated UAS test organization with a dedicated research flight test range. MAAP practices a robust Safety Management program to mitigate risks to persons, aircraft, and property. --- This request for an STA is necessary to support aviation safety-related research sponsored and administered by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center (GRC). Mosaic ATM is the prime contractor for the research project, a two-year Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) effort (NASA contract number 80NSSC21C0465). Mosaic ATM is pursuing an STA for the limited use of a Bluetooth radio beacon which, in its high-power mode, would violate FCC Part 15.247(e). Use of the beacon in the high-power mode would be limited to a maximum of eight hours per day for a maximum of seven business days. The research team anticipates actual use of the high-powered mode to be significantly less than this maximum, and closer to three hours per day for up to four business days. The maximum is given here to account for unforeseen issues, such as weather delays. This STA would allow the research team to test and compare the inflight efficacy of the high-power level radio beacon against the standard-power level radio beacon. Flight testing of the standard-power level radio beacon will proceed regardless of the outcome of this STA, however, FCC grant of this STA to allow high-power inflight testing would greatly benefit the research project and aviation safety knowledge in general. The research involves investigating a concept of how a Bluetooth radio beacon, when affixed to a small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS), can improve aviation safety by informing General Aviation (GA) pilots of sUAS 3D locations in real-time. In the concept, the Bluetooth radio broadcast includes sUAS 3D position and speed information, such as latitude, longitude, altitude, heading, and groundspeed. A computer tablet (e.g., iPad), collocated in the cockpit with the GA pilot and capable of receiving the Bluetooth signal, can then display to the pilot the sUAS location. Figure 1, available upon request, shares the cockpit display of traffic information (CDTI) that would be presented to the pilot on the tablet. In the figure, the display is suggesting to the pilot to turn right to stay clear of other traffic. Yellow and red bands indicate velocities, headings, and altitudes that should be avoided by the pilot because they would lead an unsafe proximity between the two aircraft. Longer broadcast ranges provide better forewarning and lead-time for the GA pilot. The CDTI is supplementary and informational only and not required for aviation. Responsibility for seeing and avoiding other aircraft lies with the pilot alone. The research devices do not provide separation services. All aircraft involved in the research flight test will be strategically separated by an offset (e.g., a 500-foot vertical separation). No FAA aircraft certification is required for this STA; the research devices to not impact airworthiness. ASTM International is aware of the research project and interested in the results. The Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership (MAAP), an FAA-designated UAS research organization, will plan and administer all airborne-related testing. MAAP practices a robust Safety Management program to mitigate risk and has years of experience conducting flight tests. In support of the research, Mosaic ATM has designed and produced a prototype Bluetooth radio beacon which follows the Federal Aviation Administration Remote ID Rule: https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/remote_id/. This rule is now implemented as Title 14 Part 89 under the Code of Federal Regulations. This rule mandates the broadcast of sUAS position information for certain types of sUAS operations via Bluetooth or Wi-Fi. Mosaic ATM’s research prototype is capable of two different transmission power levels. One standard-power level that conforms with FCC Part 15, transmitting at 13 dBm. And a second, high-power level, that transmits at 20 dBm. The high-power level would violate FCC Part 15.247(e) where the power spectral density exceeds 8 dBm within a 3 kHZ band during continuous transmission. The research team notes that 20 dBM is within the legal range of broadcast power and therefore anticipates that negative impacts to any nearby devices would be extremely minimal. The rationale behind the second, experimental high-power level is to extend the realized broadcast range closer to the ideal range which was defined in previous research conducted by Mosaic ATM. In this previous research, Mosaic ATM defined a 3.0 nautical mile range as the ideal broadcast range for improving aviation safety for general aviation pilots with respect to encounters with sUAS. The research team, by way of a statistical RF link budget model, believes the standard power level – 13 dBm – is capable of approximately a 0.9 nautical mile range. And the high-power level – 20 dBm - capable of around a 2.8 nautical mile range. The STA would allow the research team to explore and define the effective range of the 20 dBm broadcast, providing NASA and the FAA important information regarding the potential performance envelope. The use of the high-powered broadcast would be carefully limited, in duration and geographic location, and be constrained to two locations: 1) The first location is at the VT Montgomery Executive (KBCB) Airport. All radio testing at this location will take place on the ground. Two aircraft will be involved, again both will be on the ground and not airborne. One will be a representative GA aircraft, such as a Cessna 172. The other will be a representative small UAS. No UAS flight is allowed at KBCB. As a preventive and safety measure, the UAS propellers will be removed. This test will be administered and conducted by MAAP. 2) The second location is at MAAP’s FAA-designated UAS test site: the Kentland Experimental Aerial Systems (KEAS) laboratory [‘Kentland Farm’ for short]. Kentland Farm is an 1800-acre UAS test range 9 miles west of Blacksburg, VA. MAAP has been conducting UAS-GA flight tests at Kentland Farm since 2016 and has a proven safety record. Radio testing at Kentland Farm would involve airborne aircraft, a Diamond DA-40 GA aircraft and a Tarot sUAS. This test will be administered and conducted by MAAP.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  If granted an STA, the research team would perform carefully planned and controlled tests during weekday business hours (local times) for up to seven days of testing. The beacon would not transmit at high-power continuously throughout testing. High-power transmissions will be limited to the time necessary to conduct the high-powered portions of the tests. All transmissions – standard and high-power - will stay within the legal range of maximum permissible Effective Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP). The signal strength, connectivity range, data throughput, and other radio performance metrics will be recorded and compared between the standard mode and high-power settings. ***LOCATION 1 – VT MONTGOMERY EXECUTIVE (KBCB) AIRPORT - TYPE OF OPERATION*** TEST EXECUTION Location 1 testing will be an open-ended test without a formal test series since both aircraft will be on the ground. Different aspects of the test will be varied to fully characterize the system: • Standard and high-powered beacon modes will be utilized on the UAS • Receipt of the broadcast messages will be tested with the Remote ID receiver connected to the EFB and by the EFB itself. • Mounting of the devices will vary on both the UAS and the traditional aircraft • All aircraft will be tested with components/motors powered on and off (note that propellers will be removed from the UAS before any motor on testing) • The UAS will be located in varying positions relative to the crewed aircraft The traditional aircraft will be positioned on the tarmac of KBCB. One or more UAS aircraft equipped with RID beacons will be placed around the traditional aircraft at incremental distances out to 50 meters. Signal receipt and reliability between the RID beacons and receiver will be analyzed during testing. The traditional aircraft’s engines and components will be in different power states during the testing and changes will be communicated between test personnel and the pilot via radio. The UASs will also be tested in varying power states, and different mounting positions of the beacons will be utilized. AThe team will record all signal strength data as applicable to furnish their requirements for post-test analysis. ESTIMATE OF HIGH-POWER TRANSMISSION DURATION The research team anticipates the total duration of high-powered transmission at Location 1 to be approximately 2 hours for 1 day. SAFETY As this test will be conducted at KBCB, all test personnel will monitor the CTAF frequency. A separate frequency will be used for test communications, so test personnel will need multiple radios. All test personnel on the tarmac at KBCB will wear reflective vests. When the engine of the traditional aircraft is running all test personnel will remain clear of the propeller and will not be in line with the propeller. No UAS flight is allowed at KBCB. As a safety measure the UAS propellers will be removed for this testing. ***LOCATION 2 – KENTLAND FARM - TYPE OF OPERATION*** TEST EXECUTION Location 2 testing involves a carefully planned and scripted test series with airborne aircraft. Different aspects of the test will be varied to fully characterize the system: • Standard and high-powered beacon modes will be utilized on the UAS • Receipt of the broadcast messages will be tested with the Remote ID receiver connected to the EFB and by the EFB itself. • Mounting of the devices will vary on both types of aircraft until optimal mounting spots have been pinpointed. Optimal mounting positions will then be utilized for the remaining test. • The crewed aircraft commands various speeds and altitudes between different passes • The UAS aircraft will loiter at 3 different positions observing multiple altitudes between passes 1. Prior to each test run: a. All sUCAS devices will be fully charged and checked for readiness b. The UAS will be preflighted to ensure readiness c. All logging devices will be synced to UTC as needed 2. For each test run: a. The UAS will launch and maneuver between tightly controlled hold points. The UAS will maintain a fixed altitude, per the test series. b. The traditional aircraft will begin a pass along a prescribed route, either flying Waypoint A to Waypoint B or Waypoint B to Waypoint A c. During the encounter the sUCAS performance will be monitored d. These steps will be repeated for each test run ESTIMATE OF HIGH-POWER TRANSMISSION DURATION The research team anticipates the total duration of high-powered transmission at Location 2 to be approximately 3 hours per day for 3 days. SAFETY Testing will be conducted at Kentland Farm, an FAA-designated UAS test site with an 1800-acre test range. The traditional aircraft will be separated from UAS operations by at least a vertical and/or lateral offset. If there is no lateral offset at least a 500’ vertical offset will be observed. Pilots, MAAP test personnel, and safety officers will all be on a shared radio system. Radio communications will be verified before commencing testing.

Information
Callsign:
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 01/01/2023
Operation End Date: 06/30/2023

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Device-Solutions MB-1 Prototype 3 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Timothy M Bagnall
Title of Applicant (if any): Principal Analyst
Date: 2022-11-02 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Blacksburg Virginia North  37  12  24 West  80  24  37 Tarmac of KBCB 0.50
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2.40000000-2.48350000 GHz MO 100.000000 mW 62.373500 mW M 0.00100000 % 1M00F1D Bluetooth BLE 5.3

City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Blacksburg Virginia North  37  11  47 West  80  34  28 Kentland Experimental Aviation System Lab 2.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2.40000000-2.48350000 GHz MO 100.000000 mW 62.373500 mW M 0.00100000 % 1M00F1D Bluetooth BLE 5.3