Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-99
1
STATEMENT OF
CHAIRMAN TOM WHEELER
Re:  Rules and Regulations Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, CG 
Docket No. 02-278
Unwanted calls continue to be the top consumer complaint we receive at the Commission.  It is vital 
that we continue to use all the tools at our disposal to help protect consumers against unwanted calls.  
Consumers want and deserve control over the calls and text messages they receive.  To that end, we 
continue to push carriers and other providers to offer consumers robocall filtering tools.  Last year, in our 
Omnibus ruling, we reinforced and further clarified our robocall restrictions, including placing limits on 
calls to reassigned numbers.
Today’s action complies with a specific directive from Congress while taking steps to protect 
consumers.  
In its passage of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, Congress directed that robocalls to help collect 
federally-backed debt, such as some mortgages and student loans, must be allowed without prior consent.  
At the same time, Congress empowered the Commission to set limits on such calls.  That is what we are 
doing in the order released today.
With this Report and Order, the Commission is establishing strong, pro-consumer limits on robocalls 
to collect federal debt.  Wherever possible, the Commission has sought to limit the number of unwanted 
robocalls and ensure consumers have the tools to stop them.  This is true in this order as it was in last 
year’s Omnibus ruling.
Today’s rules limit the number of robocalls, including text messages, to three per month. The new 
rules also only allow robocalls concerning debts that are delinquent or at imminent risk of delinquency,
unless there is prior express consent otherwise.
The new rules require that, absent consent, callers only call the individual who owes the debt, not his 
or her family or friends.  This includes limiting the number of robocalls allowed to reassigned numbers, 
consistent with last year’s Omnibus robocall ruling. 
The new rules reiterate that consumers have the right to stop calls they do not want at any point they 
wish, and require callers to inform consumers of that right.
The new rules place limits on the duration of calls (excluding required disclosures).  Specifically, pre-
recorded or artificial voice calls cannot exceed 60 seconds and text messages cannot exceed 160 
characters.
The new rules apply to each caller, rather than each debt.  Otherwise, consumers who have multiple 
loans with a single owner of the debt, as many do, could be receiving an excessive number of robocalls 
per month to their cell phones.  This limitation prevents that from occurring.  
In addition, the Commission’s rules limit the time of day when robocalls can take place, requiring that 
no robocalls can may be made before 8 a.m. and after 9 p.m. local time at the called party’s location.  
These protections are particularly important following a January Supreme Court ruling that federal
government entities conducting official business are not subject to robocall limits unless Congress says 
otherwise. Our decision implements Congress’s directive and responds to thousands of comments from 
consumers expressing frustration with robocalls and urging clear, strong limits on debt collection calls.  
It is important to note that our decision will not open a door for telemarking calls.  Congress specified 
that excepted calls must be “solely” to collect a federal debt, and we have ensured they do not go beyond 
that.
Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-99
2
Congress gave us a quick deadline to implement these new rules.  I am proud that we have met that 
deadline and thank my fellow Commissioners and other Federal agencies for their helpful input into the 
decision.