*Pages 1--117 from Microsoft Word - 22916.doc*
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
Before the Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D. C. 20554

In the Matter of
Revisions to Broadcast Auxiliary Service Rules in Part 74 and Conforming Technical Rules for
Broadcast Auxiliary Service, Cable Television Relay Service and Fixed Services in Parts 74, 78
and 101 of the Commission’s Rules
Telecommunications Industry Association, Petition for Rule Making Regarding Digital
Modulation for the Television Broadcast Auxiliary Service

Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, Petition for Rule Making Regarding
Low- Power Video Assist Devices in Portions of the UHF and VHF Television Bands

) )
) )
) )
) )
) )
) )
) )
) )
)

ET Docket No. 01- 75
RM- 9418
RM- 9856
REPORT AND ORDER
Adopted: October 30, 2002 Released: November 13, 2002

By the Commission:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subject Paragraph I. INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................. 1
II. BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................... 6 III. DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................................. 7
A. BAS Technical Rules (Part 74) and Conforming Technical Rules for Parts 74, 78 and 101 1. Digital Modulation in All Television and Aural BAS Bands ........................................... 8
2. Maximum Effective Isotropic Radiated Power for Short Paths...................................... 21 3. Transmitter Power............................................................................................................ 27
4. Emission Masks ............................................................................................................... 33 5. Automatic Transmit Power Control................................................................................. 46
6. Interference to Geostationary Satellites........................................................................... 49 7. Frequency Coordination .................................................................................................. 53
8. Frequency Tolerance........................................................................................................ 66 9. Use of the 13.150- 13.2125 GHz Band by BAS and CARS Pickup Stations ................. 69
10. Use of the 31.0- 31.3 GHz and 38.6- 40.0 GHz Bands by the BAS and CARS .............. 72 11. Antennas .......................................................................................................................... 77
1
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
2
B. BAS Service Rules (Part 74) 1. Temporary Conditional Authority ................................................................................... 79
2. Short Term Operation ...................................................................................................... 82 3. Use of UHF- TV Channels for TV STLs and TV Relay Stations ................................... 93
4. TV BAS Sound Channels .............................................................................................. 101 5. Remote Pickup Broadcast Auxiliary Frequency Assignment....................................... 103
6. Federal Narrowbanding of 162- 174 MHz Band Land Mobile Frequencies................. 116 7. 950 MHz Aural BAS Channel Splits ........................................................................... 121
C. Universal Licensing System and BAS ........................................................................................ 122 1. Application Procedures and Construction Periods........................................................ 123
2. Classification of Filings as Major or Minor .................................................................. 130 3. Emission Designators..................................................................................................... 135
D. Additional BAS Issues ............................................................................................................... 138 E. AMPTP Petition ......................................................................................................................... 139
1. Authorization of WAVDS ............................................................................................. 140 2. Eligibility, Permitted Use, and Licensing...................................................................... 143
3. Authorized Frequencies ................................................................................................. 150 4. Technical and Operational Requirements...................................................................... 156
IV. CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................... 162 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS.................................................................................................................... 163
VI. ORDERING CLAUSES........................................................................................................................... 165
APPENDICES A. Final Rules
B. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis C. List of Commenters

I. INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. In this Report and Order, we amend Part 74 of our rules pertaining to the Broadcast Auxiliary Services (BAS) to permit BAS stations to introduce new technologies and create a more

efficient BAS that can more readily adapt as the broadcast industry converts to the use of digital technology, such as digital television (DTV). We also make conforming amendments to Part 73 of our
rules pertaining to the Radio Broadcast Services, to Part 78 of our rules pertaining to the Cable Television Relay Service (CARS), 1 and to Part 101 of our rules pertaining to Fixed Microwave Services (FS). In
many cases, the BAS, CARS, and FS share frequency bands and have technically and operationally similar stations, and our rule changes will permit these three services to operate under consistent
regulatory guidelines. 2

1 CARS stations are point- to- point or point- to- multipoint microwave systems used by cable and Multichannel
Multipoint Distribution Service (wireless cable) operators to receive signals from remote locations. Alternatively, CARS can also be used for distribution of programming to microwave hubs where it may be physically impossible

or too expensive to run cable to these hubs. CARS stations cannot be used to directly distribute programming to subscribers and can operate on the following shared frequency bands: 1990- 2110 MHz (mobile only),
6425- 6525 MHz (mobile only), 6875- 7125 MHz (mobile only), 12.70- 13.20 GHz, and 17.70- 19.70 GHz.
2 For example, the 13,200- 13,250 MHz band is shared by common carrier and private point- to- point operations – as
well as the local television transmission service – in Part 101, TV BAS operations in Part 74, and CARS operations in Part 78. See 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.602, 78.18, and 101.147. In all cases, the maximum authorized bandwidth is

(continued….)
2
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
3
2. Specifically, to conform the BAS, CARS, and FS rules, we:
€ Permit TV and aural BAS stations to use any available digital modulation technique in all BAS frequency bands so that BAS stations can take advantage of the latest developments in technology

and make smooth the transition to digital TV and digital radio.
€ Update BAS emission masks to facilitate the introduction of digital equipment and to provide consistency with emission masks used in Part 101 of the rules.

€ Modify the equation used by BAS and CARS services for determining the maximum effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) for short path lengths. This change eliminates the steep reduction in
EIRP for BAS and CARS path lengths shorter than the minimum.
€ Allow BAS and CARS stations to use automatic transmit power control (ATPC) in order to facilitate more efficient spectrum use.

€ Update transmitter power rules for BAS and CARS services to provide EIRP limits for all frequency bands.
€ Require TV BAS and CARS services to prior coordinate their frequency use when using shared frequency bands to minimize the potential for harmful interference occurring when a new station
begins transmitting.
3. In addition, we update many other BAS rules and make minor rule changes to clarify or fix typographical errors in the existing rules. These updates include instituting temporary conditional

authority for all BAS stations to operate upon filing of a license application, provided certain conditions are met; modifying the Remote Pickup BAS channel plan to provide compatibility with the channel plan
adopted for private land mobile radio (PLMR) in the Commission’s Refarming proceeding (PR Docket No. 92- 235); modifying the BAS short- term operation rules; and modifying the BAS application rules to
make them consistent with the Universal Licensing System (ULS).
4. This Report and Order also authorizes wireless assist video devices (WAVDs) to operate on certain VHF- TV and UHF- TV channels on a non- interference basis to services allocated on that

spectrum. These devices, which are already used by broadcasters, are needed to aid film and television producers in filming at various locations in a safe and cost effective manner.

5. These changes will increase the efficiency of the BAS and permit BAS, CARS, and FS licensees to operate in an environment in which the potential for interference is significantly reduced,
while affording significant flexibility to these licensees.
II. BACKGROUND
6. In the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (Notice), released March 19, 2001, the Commission initiated an extensive review of the BAS rules and proposed changes to create a more

(Continued from previous page) 25 MHz. See 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.637, 78.103, and 101.109. Other technical rules, such as EIRP on short paths, differ
among the services. This action will align certain technical requirements for these services. See, e. g., 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.644, 78.108, and 101.143.
3
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
4
efficient BAS that can readily adapt to technological changes in the industry. 3 The Notice followed petitions filed by the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) in March 1998 (RM- 9418) and the
Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) in November 1999 (RM- 9856). The TIA Petition requested rule changes for the 23 GHz band, as well as rule changes to permit digital modulation
schemes in all of the bands used by the TV BAS. 4 The AMPTP Petition requested authority to use low power WAVDs on unused TV channels in the upper portion of the VHF- TV band and in the UHF- TV
band. 5 In addition to these requests, the Commission sought comment on many other changes to the rules. The proposals were crafted to update the rules and to complement many of the requests made by
the petitioners.
III. DISCUSSION
7. Commenting parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice. 6 For example, the Society of Broadcast Engineers, Inc. (SBE) states that it applauds virtually all of the

proposals made in the Notice; the Association of America’s Public Television Stations (APTS) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) state that they generally support the proposals; and the Association for
Maximum Service Television, Inc. (MSTV) and the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) state that they applaud allowing digital modulation for all BAS bands and support the revision and
conformance of BAS with CARS and FS rules. 7
A. BAS Technical Rules (Part 74) and Conforming Technical Rules for Parts 74, 78 and 101

1. Digital Modulation in All Television and Aural BAS Bands
8. Section 74.637 of the Commission’s rules sets forth emission requirements for TV BAS operations. Digital modulation is specifically addressed only in paragraph (c), which provides for analog

or digital modulation in the 6425- 6525 MHz, 17.7– 19.7 GHz, and 31.0– 31.3 GHz bands. Although the rules do not specifically prohibit digital modulation in other TV BAS bands (i. e., 2025- 2110 MHz and
2450- 2483.5 MHz (2 GHz), 6875- 7125 MHz (7 GHz), and 12.7– 13.25 GHz (13 GHz)), the Commission’s policy relative to BAS has been to allow digital modulation only in bands where it is

3 Revisions to Broadcast Auxiliary Service Rules in Part 74 and Conforming Technical Rules for Broadcast
Auxiliary Service, Cable Television Relay Service and Fixed Services in Parts 74, 78 and 101 of the Commission’s Rules, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket No. 01- 75, 16 FCC Rcd 10556 (2001).

4 See TIA Petition, RM- 9418, filed March 5, 1998. We note that the changes sought by TIA for the 23 GHz band
have been considered in a separate proceeding. See Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission’s Rules to Streamline Processing of Microwave Applications in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Telecommunications

Industry Association Petition for Rulemaking, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 00- 19 and RM- 9418, (FCC 02- 218) (rel. July 31, 2002) at ¶¶ 52- 77.

5 See AMPTP Petition, RM- 9856, filed November 15, 1999.
6 Commenting parties are listed in Appendix B. Comments to the Notice were originally due by June 25, 2001 and
reply comments were originally due by July 23, 2001. However, those deadlines were extended until July 9, 2001 and August 7, 2001, respectively. See Order Granting Extension of Time, ET Docket No. 01- 75, 16 FCC Rcd

12656 (2001).
7 SBE Comments at 1; APTS/ PBS Comments at 2, 9; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 2- 3.
4
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
5
specifically authorized. Therefore, under current policy, licensees must obtain a waiver of the rules to transmit using digital modulation in the 2 GHz, 7 GHz, and 13 GHz bands. 8
9. In the Notice, the Commission observed that most TV BAS stations currently transmit frequency modulated analog NTSC video signals, but that with the current transition of television from
analog to digital, broadcasters will need to transmit DTV digital signals in addition to their existing NTSC analog signal. The Commission also observed that the digital conversion of TV stations is not the only
reason for allowing digital modulation in all TV BAS frequency bands. The rules adopted in the Second Report and Order and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket No. 95- 18 specify
channelization plans for TV BAS licensees to narrow their channel bandwidth in the 2025- 2110 MHz band to accommodate the new Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) allocation in the 1990- 2025 MHz band.
The Commission noted that, as these channels are narrowed, broadcasters will likely switch from analog to digital transmission in order to attain the necessary signal fidelity in the narrower channel. Therefore,
primarily to facilitate the transition to digital TV and to accommodate narrower channels in the 2 GHz band, the Commission proposed to modify the rules in Section 74.637 to permit digital modulation in all
TV BAS bands. 9
10. In the Notice, the Commission also stated that the rules for aural BAS in Section 74.535 create a situation similar to that for TV BAS with respect to digital modulation because it allows the use

of digital modulation by aural BAS licensees in the 18 GHz band, but does not address such use in the 944- 952 MHz band. The Commission stated its belief that aural BAS licensees could benefit from the
ability to use digital modulation in all bands, and that such flexibility would allow aural BAS licensees to take advantage of the spectral efficiency that digital modulation offers. Therefore, the Commission
proposed to modify Section 74.535 to permit the use of digital modulation in all aural BAS bands. 10
11. Several parties support the Commission’s proposals to permit digital modulation in the 2 GHz, 7 GHz, and 13 GHz TV BAS bands, and all aural BAS bands. 11 SBE, while supporting the

introduction of digital modulation in all TV and aural BAS bands, cautions that digitally modulated signals tend to more fully occupy the channel bandwidth than analog signals, thereby creating a greater
chance for interference to occur into adjacent channel FM receivers. 12 Accordingly, SBE recommends that conversion from analog to digital modulation be accompanied by frequency coordination, except
where an existing digital system has been operating under STA and there is no evidence of interference. SBE states that it may be appropriate to conduct a further rulemaking to establish loading standards for
digitally modulated point- to- point BAS links. It opposes, however, similar standards for digitally modulated TV Pickup or ENG operations because TV Pickup operations require more robust digital

8 Currently, there are approximately 500 pending waiver requests for use of digital modulation in the 2 GHz, 7 GHz,
and 13 GHz bands on file at the Commission. In general, the Commission’s Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) has been issuing Special Temporary Authority (STA) to stations to permit them to transmit with digital

modulation in these bands.
9 Notice at ¶ 11.

10 Id. at ¶ 12.
11 See SBE Comments at 1- 2; Comsearch Comments at 2; APTS/ PBS Comments at 2; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 3;
Red River Reply Comments at 1; TIA Reply Comments at 2; Viacom Reply Comments at 5.
12 SBE Comments at 1.
5
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
6
modulation types and higher levels of forward error correction than fixed links. 13 Finally, SBE requests that the Commission grant a blanket waiver for the approximately 500 pending digital BAS applications,
to allow their immediate grant and obviate the need for further STA filing and processing. 14
12. MSTV/ NAB support allowing digital modulation on all BAS frequencies and urge that the Commission grant a blanket waiver to allow digital modulation on an interim basis pending the

outcome of this proceeding. They contend that permitting broadcasters to use digital modulation in all BAS bands will facilitate the transition to DTV. 15 However, they also believe that, in the 2 GHz band,
there is uncertainty about the likelihood of implementing MSS. MSTV/ NAB therefore urge the Commission to proceed slowly with the development of digital technical rules for the 2 GHz band and to
defer adoption of any rules until the issue of potentially reallocating the MSS spectrum is resolved. 16
13. Comsearch states that it supports allowing digital modulation in the 944- 952 MHz and 2, 7, and 13 GHz bands without the need for a rule waiver. Comsearch states that, once digital modulation

is permitted in these bands, the Commission should consider modifying the BAS frequency plans in these bands, such as by overlaying narrowband channels on the existing 25 MHz channels in the 7 GHz band.
Comsearch also recommends that, to promote efficient use of the spectrum, the Commission consider capacity and loading requirements for digital BAS systems, similar to those in Section 101.141( a)( 3), but
adjusted for technical differences in the services. 17
14. Microwave Radio Communications, LLC (MRC) recommends that digitally modulated BAS transmissions be required to contain a signal identifier, either in the program source or the digital

modulation process, and recommends a phase- in period during which a universally recognized standard can be adopted. 18 SBE asserts that there is a need for automatic identification for digitally modulated
BAS and CARS TV Pickup and Local Television Transmission Service stations, to permit quick and easy identification in case of inadvertent interference. SBE recommends that such identification should be
comprised of an FCC call sign, a unit number or other identifier, a contact telephone number, and a
13 Id. at 2- 3.
14 Id. at 3.
15 MSTV/ NAB Comments at 4.
16 Id. at 5. The Commission is considering various options for alternative uses and new allocations in portions of
the 1990- 2025 MHz band used by the Mobile Satellite Service (MSS), previously allocated to TV BAS. For example, in IB Docket No. 01- 185, we are seeking comment on proposals that would allow MSS licensees to

provide ancillary terrestrial component (ATC) operations in the 1990- 2025 MHz MSS band. In ET Docket No. 00- 258, we are seeking comment on proposals to support the introduction of new advanced wireless services, including
Third Generation (3- G) wireless systems in spectrum below 3 GHz, including some of the MSS spectrum in the 1990- 2025 MHz band. In WT Docket No. 02- 55, we are exploring various options to improve public safety
communications in the 800 MHz band that could include relocating incumbent 800 MHz services to the current MSS allocation in the 1990- 2025 MHz band. In this connection, we recently suspended for one year, until
September 6, 2003, the expiration date for the initial two- year mandatory negotiation period for Phase 1 of the 2 GHz band relocation plan between MSS and BAS. See Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission’s Rules to
Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz for Use by the Mobile- Satellite Service, Order, ET Docket No. 95- 18, 67 FR 53754 (rel. Aug. 19, 2002).

17 Comsearch Comments at 2.
18 MRC Comments at 8.
6
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
7
manufacturer identification and serial number. SBE asserts that such an identification system would be inexpensive and therefore recommends that a Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making be issued to
explore this issue. 19
15. Discussion. As proposed in the Notice, we are modifying Section 74.637 to permit use of any available digital modulation technique in all TV BAS bands and are modifying Section 74.535 to

permit digital modulation in all aural BAS bands. We find that permitting digital modulation in the 2 GHz, 7 GHz, 13 GHz TV BAS bands, and all aural BAS bands will provide licensees with increased
flexibility in the provision of BAS operations, promote more efficient use of this spectrum, and facilitate the transition to reduced channel bandwidths in the 2 GHz band, and to DTV.

16. We see no need to delay the adoption of technical rules for digital modulation in the 2 GHz band, as suggested by MSTV/ NAB. We note that there are approximately twenty pending
applications for use of digital modulation in the 2 GHz band and see no reason to delay such operations. Licensees may apply for licenses using digital emissions beginning on the effective date of the rules of
this Report and Order.
17. We find no need to impose digital loading requirements at this time. We note that no specific proposals were offered and there is no indication that these bands are being used inefficiently. On

the contrary, we expect that these bands will be used more intensively with the transition to DTV and the development of new broadcast services.

18. With respect to embedded automatic identification for digital modulation, we note that such identification is currently technically feasible and legally permissible under current rules. 20 Rather
than codifying mandatory automatic identification procedures and standards, we believe that the industry would be better served with flexibility to develop and maintain such a standard. Under this approach a
standard could be quickly updated when new modulation techniques are used. Therefore, we decline to adopt a mandatory standard for automatic identification for digital modulation.

19. In order to facilitate the expeditious processing of the approximately 500 pending applications for digital BAS operations, the following BAS rules as amended in Appendix A will become
effective as of the adoption date of this Report and Order: Sections 74.535 and 74.637. 21 Pursuant to 5 U. S. C. §§ 553( d)( 1) and 553( d)( 3), we find good cause to make these rules effective immediately rather
than to follow the normal practice of making them effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, due to the pendency of the BAS applications. Accordingly, we will begin processing these BAS
applications on the adoption date of this Report and Order. Defective BAS applications filed on or before the release date of this Report and Order will be returned with the opportunity to amend. Defective
BAS applications filed after the release date of this Report and Order may be subject to dismissal. In addition, we will allow relief from any new frequency coordination requirement imposed by the rules we
are adopting, such as new prior coordination procedures for fixed systems proposed in applications
19 SBE Comments at 3, 4 and 27. SBE would exempt from automatic identification low power, size/ weight critical
applications until those applications would not be burdened by compliance. Id. at 3- 4. See also Viacom Reply Comments at 5.

20 We note that station identification is required for remote pickup BAS stations, aural BAS stations, TV BAS
stations with output power of one watt or more, and low power auxiliary stations with output power exceeding 50 milliwatts. See Sections 74.482, 74.582, 74.682, and 74.882. 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.482, 74.582, 74.682, and 74.882.

21 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.535 and 74.637.
7
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
8
accepted for filing before the effective date of the rules. 22 Specifically, we will deem digital applications filed before the effective date of the rules in this Report and Order to have been properly coordinated
under the existing coordination requirements, absent any evidence to the contrary, and we will not require re- coordination of these applications under prior coordination procedures effective under the new rules
that also permit digital modulation. 23 We conclude that adherence to the existing frequency coordination requirements has been sufficient to ensure that these digital and analog/ digital systems do not cause
harmful interference to existing stations, and that re- coordination, or the imposition of frequency coordination where it was not previously required, would be unnecessarily burdensome to the applicants.
Moreover, most digital BAS systems that have been applied for are operating under an STA and we have not received any evidence of interference from these systems. We therefore will not require re-coordination
for digital applications filed before the effective date of the rules. Finally, we will exercise flexibility with respect to compliance with the technical rules adopted herein when processing these
applications.
20. Given the expedited handling and reliefs set forth above, we believe that a blanket waiver as requested by SBE and MSTV/ NAB would not further hasten the processing of pending digital

applications, and its benefit would be minimal. We therefore find the issuance of a blanket waiver unnecessary, and decline to do so.

2. Maximum Effective Isotropic Radiated Power for Short Paths
21. There are several TV BAS rules that work in tandem to regulate the amount of power that can be used at a specific station. Specifically, Section 74.636 limits, for some frequency bands, the

maximum EIRP 24 for which a TV BAS station can be licensed, 25 and Section 74.644 specifies the

22 Generally, these are the applications previously filed with the WTB seeking a waiver of the rules to allow the use
of digital modulation in the 2 GHz, 7 GHz, and 13 GHz bands.
23 Current BAS rules encourage local coordination procedures, except in the 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz
bands shared with FS operations, where the procedures set forth in Section 101.103( d), commonly referred to as “prior coordination procedures,” are required for both services prior to the filing of an application, and in the 12.7-

13.25 GHz band, where an engineering study must be conducted prior to the filing of an application. See 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.502( c), 74.503( a), 74.604( a), 74.638, and 101.103( d). Local coordination procedures are not defined in the
rules, but rather, Sections 74.503( a) and 74.604( a) place the responsibility for frequency selection to avoid interference on applicants, encouraging the use of local BAS coordinators or coordination committees where they
exist, and no evidence of the accomplishment of frequency coordination is required to be submitted with the license application. This process is collectively referred to as “local frequency coordination” or as “local coordination
procedures” Prior coordination procedures in Section 101.103( d) require formal notification to and response from all potentially affected licensees/ applicants prior to filing an application and the submission of a certification of
completion of notification and response, and a list of licensees/ applicants notified, with the application. As detailed in Section III. A. 7 below, this Report and Order adopts prior coordination procedures for all fixed BAS operations
except in the 1990- 2110 MHz band, where local coordination procedures will remain in effect. We address the need for frequency coordination for applications for digital or analog/ digital operation filed under new frequency
coordination and major/ minor classification rules in Sections III. A. 4 and III. C. 2 below.
24 EIRP is the product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain. The power supplied to the
antenna is the transmitter output power minus some line loss due to the transmission of the signal from the transmitter to the antenna.

25 47 C. F. R. § 74.636.
8
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
9
minimum path length for which the maximum EIRP will be authorized for fixed links. 26 Applicants proposing path lengths shorter than the minimum path lengths specified in Section 74.644, are required to
reduce power in accordance with the equation provided in that section. 27
22. Currently, the equation specified in Section 74.644 requires a steep reduction in EIRP for paths slightly shorter than the specified minimum. 28 For example, the maximum EIRP for fixed links

operating in the 6875- 7125 MHz band is 55 dBW and the minimum path length is 17 km. Based on the current equation, an applicant proposing a path length of 16 km would have to reduce its EIRP to 29.5
dBW, a reduction of more than 25 dB. As stated in the Notice, this equation was previously used for determining maximum EIRP for short paths for FS operations in Part 101 as well. The Notice observed
that, in the Report and Order in WT Docket No. 94- 148, the Commission adopted a new equation for Part 101 that eliminated the steep drop in EIRP at path lengths slightly shorter than the minimum. 29 Using the
equation now codified at Section 101.143, 30 the reduction in EIRP for the example above would be approximately 1 dB – a sharp contrast to the 25 dB computed using the current equation in Section
74.644.
23. The Commission further noted that the same equation as currently used for the BAS is also used for CARS. The Commission stated that it believed that the CARS would also benefit from

modifying the equation for determining maximum power for short path lengths. Accordingly, the Commission proposed to modify Sections 74.644 and 78.108 to implement the same equation codified at
Section 101.143 for determining the maximum EIRP for path lengths shorter than the specified minimum. 31 The Commission noted that BAS rules do not currently specify a minimum path length in the
2450- 2483.5 MHz band, but FS rules do so for FS operations. The Commission therefore also proposed to adopt a minimum path length, at which the maximum EIRP would be allowed, of 17 km for the BAS in
the 2450– 2483.5 MHz band, consistent with the minimum path length imposed on similar FS operations in that spectrum. It took this action to promote spectrum efficiency by preventing the use of overpowered
systems by BAS over short paths in that band. Finally, the Commission proposed to grandfather at their current power any existing fixed links in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band that are less than 17 km. 32

24. The parties generally support the Commission’s proposals changing the equation for
26 47 C. F. R. § 74.644. We will refer to the minimum path length for which maximum EIRP will be authorized
simply as minimum path length. We note, however, that this discussion concerns the accommodation of path lengths that are shorter than the minimum path length.

27 47 C. F. R. § 74.644( b). The equation specified in the rules is EIRP = 30 – 20 log( A/ B) dBW; where A is the
minimum path length specified in paragraph (a) of this section and B is the actual path length in kilometers.
28 See TIA Petition at A. 28.

29 See In The Matter Of Reorganization And Revision Of Parts 1, 2, 21, And 94 Of The Rules To Establish A New
Part 101 Governing Terrestrial Microwave Fixed Radio Services, WT Docket No. 94- 148, Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 13449 (1996) (Part 101 Order). The equation adopted in that action is EIRP = MAXEIRP – 40 log

(A/ B); where MAXEIRP is the maximum allowable EIRP, A is the minimum path length specified in the rules, and B is the actual path length in kilometers.

30 47 C. F. R. § 101.143.
31 Notice at ¶ 16.
32 Id. at ¶ 17.
9
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
10
maximum EIRP for short paths, establishing a minimum path length of 17 km for the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band, and grandfathering at their current power level any existing fixed links in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz
band that are less than 17 km. 33 In addition, SBE and MRC recommend that existing BAS links that were authorized before April 1, 1987 and grandfathered by the current provisions of Section 74.644 with
respect to path length and EIRP, and that are modifying their authorizations to convert from analog to multiplexed analog plus digital or to digital operation, should not lose their grandfathered status. 34 SBE
explains that such paths may require continued operation at elevated power levels to avert interference from other systems. MRC asserts that grandfathered status should continue for such paths, provided the
converted paths do not cause harmful interference to existing co- channel or adjacent channel systems. MRC also asserts that if any existing TV studio- transmitter link (STL) or TV relay link 35 is converted
from analog to multiplexed digital/ analog operation and is approved by a local coordinating body, that conversion should be treated as a minor modification. MRC recommends that existing inefficient analog
receivers not be protected from converting grandfathered links. Specifically, MRC recommends that, if a grandfathered link converting from analog to multiplexed analog/ digital operation would cause harmful
interference to an analog receiver with a 3 dB bandwidth greater than 30 MHz, that receiver would be required to be upgraded. Finally, MRC recommends that the 1990- 2110 MHz and 2450- 2483.5 MHz
bands be made available for use by Remote Pickup BAS as well as mobile TV BAS operations currently occupying the spectrum, and that fixed operations in these bands be phased out over time, in favor of
mobile use of the spectrum, which MRC believes is more appropriate. In order to encourage the migration of point- to- point fixed links out of these bands, MRC recommends that new point- to- point
fixed links with path lengths less than 17 km not be permitted and that existing such links be phased out of these bands within five years. 36

25. Discussion. We find that adopting the proposals set forth in the Notice will enhance the reliability of fixed links for the BAS in Part 74 and the CARS in Part 78. Adopting the same equation for
fixed operations in each of these rule parts will treat similar stations in a comparable manner, simplify station coordination in shared frequency bands, and reduce the potential of harmful interference occurring
among stations authorized under different rule parts. Accordingly, we are modifying our rules to implement in Sections 74.644 and 78.108 the same equation codified at Section 101.143 for determining
the maximum EIRP for path lengths shorter than the specified minimum. Further, we are grandfathering existing fixed links that are less than 17 km in length in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band. However, we will
not permit grandfathered or other existing links that are modifying from analog operation to analog/ digital or digital operation, to retain grandfathered status, and thus continue operation at their current elevated
power levels, or be treated as minor modifications, even if operation is interference- free or is frequency coordinated, unless operation at the higher power levels is justified. Such continuation would otherwise

33 See SBE Comments at 4- 5; Comsearch Comments at 2- 3; APTS/ PBS Comments at 3; MSTV/ NAB Comments at
6; MRC Comments at 7; TIA Reply Comments at 2.
34 SBE Comments at 4- 5; MRC Comments at 7.

35 Section 74.601 defines a TV STL station (studio- transmitter link) as a fixed station used for the transmission of
TV program material and related communications from the studio to the transmitter of a TV broadcast, Class A TV, or low power TV station, or for other purposes as authorized in § 74.631. Section 74.601 defines a TV relay station

as a fixed station used for transmission of TV program material and related communications for use by TV broadcast, Class A TV, and low power TV stations, of for other purposes as authorized in § 74.631. 47 C. F. R. §
74.601.
36 MRC Comments at 7.
10
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
11
ignore the existing requirement in Sections 74.644 and 78.108( c) that power in excess of that specified be justified by an appropriate technical showing, 37 and could lead to the continuation of unnecessarily
excessive power levels, thus defeating the spectral efficiency intended by minimum path length requirements. We decline to classify the conversion from analog to analog/ digital or digital operation as a
minor modification, as recommended by MRC. For reasons explained in detail in III. A. 4, III. A. 7, and III. C. 2 below, such a change is and will remain classified as major under Section 1.929. 38 Further, while
operation without interference is possible, and frequency coordination may demonstrate the ability of the system to operate without interference, neither would necessarily justify the continuation of higher power
levels, or thus warrant the continuation. We therefore decline to accept such conditions as sufficient justification to warrant the continuation of higher power levels, and will continue to require an
appropriate technical showing justifying the elevated power, as required by Section 74.644. With respect to MRC's recommendation to require upgrade of old analog receivers to avert harmful interference from a
system converting to multiplexed analog/ digital operation, we decline to impose such an upgrade, as our rules do not contain minimum receiver performance requirements.

26. Finally, we decline to designate the 1990- 2110 MHz and 2450- 2483.5 MHz bands for use by Remote Pickup BAS operations as requested by MRC. MRC does not provide justification or
elaboration for this proposal, no other commenters support it, and, moreover, it is outside the scope of this proceeding. We also decline to phase out fixed operation in these bands, to prohibit new fixed path
lengths shorter than 17 km in these bands, or to phase out existing short paths in these bands in five years. We recognize that it is possible that the removal of fixed paths could free up spectrum for mobile use in
some areas. However, we find that such action would unnecessarily limit the flexibility of TV BAS to accommodate fixed paths, where such paths are feasible and desirable with respect to mobile use of the
band. This is particularly true for short paths, whose reduced EIRP can accommodate them in a spectrally efficient way. Moreover, the forced relocation of existing fixed links would be a burden on licensees.
Finally, no commenters from the BAS community that would be affected by MRC’s proposed curtailments support them. We thus find their adoption unwarranted.

3. Transmitter Power
27. Currently, Sections 74.636 and 74.534 of the Commission’s rules specify the power limitations for TV and aural BAS operations, respectively. 39 For some frequency bands, only transmitter

output power is specified, and for other bands, both transmitter output power and EIRP, which describes the amount of energy that is actually being radiated by the transmitting antenna, are specified. 40 In the

37 Sections 74.644( c) and 78.108( c) state that upon appropriate technical showing, applicants and licensees unable
to meet the minimum path length requirement may be granted an exception to the EIRP reduction requirements. See 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.644( c), 78.108( c). For example, operation through a passive repeater, where the path of the

transmitted signal comprises two segments, one before and one after the repeater, may necessitate that the EIRP on a shorter first segment be elevated to ensure that the signal will, after propagating over both segments, be sufficient
for reliable reception at the final receive antenna.
38 47 C. F. R. § 1.929.

39 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.534, 74.636. We note that it is common for a single transmitter to be certificated for use in Parts
74, 78, and 101 and Sections 74.534 and 74.636.
40 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.636 and 74.534. For example, Section 74.636 specifies a maximum allowable transmitter power
of 20.0 watts for fixed TV BAS operations in the 1990- 2110 MHz band, but does not specify a maximum allowable EIRP. In contrast, this rule Section specifies a maximum allowable output power of 20 watts and a maximum

allowable EIRP of 55 dBW for fixed TV BAS operations in the 6875- 7125 MHz band.
11
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
12
Notice, the Commission proposed to modify the BAS rules to specify only EIRP values for all aural and TV BAS frequency bands. It proposed to conform EIRP limitations on BAS and CARS operations with
those for FS operations in bands where operation is similar, and to specify EIRP limitations on mobile BAS and CARS operations based on existing maximum transmitter power and typical antenna gain.
Specifically, the Commission proposed that: (a) aural BAS operations in the 944- 952 MHz band be limited to a maximum EIRP of 40 dBW; (b) fixed operations for TV BAS in the 1990- 2110 MHz and
2450- 2500 MHz bands be limited to a maximum EIRP of 45 dBW; and (c) mobile operations for TV BAS in those same bands and CARS operations in the 1990- 2110 MHz band be limited to a maximum
EIRP of 35 dBW. The Commission sought comment on whether the 50 dBW EIRP limit on FS operations in the 12,700- 13,250 MHz band should be increased to conform with the 55 dBW limit on
BAS and CARS operations in that band. It also sought comment on whether different power standards should be adopted for digital and analog equipment. The Commission also requested comment as to
whether it should remove the specifications for transmitter output power from the BAS rules consistent with the Part 101 approach. 41

28. Most parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice. 42 Comsearch states that it agrees with harmonizing the power limits among Parts 74, 78, and 101 and expressing power limits
in terms of maximum permitted EIRP. However, Comsearch states that it believes that multichannel video transmission under Parts 74 and 78 do not require higher EIRP than systems under Part 101 in the
12,700- 13,250 MHz band. It recommends that the Part 101 EIRP limit of 50 dBW be conformed to the higher 55 dBW limit for this band in Parts 74 and 78, if future licensing is permitted under Part 101 in
that band. 43 MRC states that it supports the proposed maximum EIRP of 35 dBW for mobile TV BAS operations in the 2 GHz and 2.5 GHz bands because that EIRP is representative of current ENG systems.
MRC also supports specifying EIRP rather than output power because specifying EIRP would facilitate designing more practical systems and reduce the need to mount transmitters close to antennas. 44
Globalstar USA, Inc. and Globalstar, L. P. (Globalstar) urge the Commission to correct its terminology and proposed tables to specify the 2450- 2483.5 MHz, rather than the 2450- 2500 MHz, band, since the
2483.5- 2500 MHz band is no longer available to new BAS stations. 45
29. SBE agrees with the proposal to eliminate transmitter output power limits in favor of EIRP limits for fixed links, because it would allow a licensee the option of installing a high power

transmitter to overcome prohibitive waveguide losses on a tall tower. However, SBE opposes eliminating output power limits for TV Pickup stations because the lack of antenna standards for these stations would
pose an interference threat to other users. SBE concurs with the proposed EIRP limits for 950 MHz Aural BAS fixed links and 2 and 2.5 GHz fixed links. SBE opposes lower EIRP limits for digitally modulated
systems than for analog modulated systems because they may operate in interference- limited markets where a lower maximum EIRP could result in more susceptibility to interference from higher EIRP
analog paths. 46 SBE also opposes Globalstar’s recommendation that only the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band be
41 Notice at ¶¶ 18- 24.

42 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 3; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 6; MRC Comments at 8; TIA Reply Comments at 3.
43 Comsearch Comments at 3- 4. Comsearch explains that multichannel video systems typically use much lower
EIRP levels than single channel transmission systems because of linearity issues within the transmission system.
44 MRC Comments at 8.

45 Globalstar Comments at 3.
46 SBE Comments at 5- 6.
12
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
13
specified as available for BAS operations. SBE notes that BAS stations at 2483.5- 2500 MHz band were grandfathered by the Report and Order in Gen. Docket 84- 690. 47
30. Discussion. We find that the proposals to harmonize power limits among Parts 74, 78, and 101, and to express those limits as maximum EIRPs will provide consistency and promote greater
efficiency in our rules. Accordingly, we are adopting our proposals and are specifying the following EIRP limits: (a) for aural BAS operations in the 944- 952 MHz band, 40 dBW; (b) for fixed operations for
TV BAS in the 1990- 2110 MHz and 2450- 2483.5 MHz bands, 45 dBW; and (c) for mobile operations for TV BAS in the 1990- 2110 MHz and 2450- 2483.5 MHz bands and CARS operations in the 1990- 2110
MHz band, 35 dBW. We are also deleting output power limitations for fixed systems as it will permit flexibility in designing systems. However, we will maintain output power limitations in the rules for
mobile systems. Maintaining these limits will reduce the potential for interference from mobile systems because they limit EIRP for omnidirectional mobile systems and reduce off- axis EIRP for directional
mobile systems.
31. As noted above, Comsearch asks that the Part 101 EIRP limit for the 12,200- 13,250 MHz band be amended from 50 dBW to conform to the Parts 74 and 78 limit of 55 dBW. We generally agree.

As stated throughout this proceeding, we believe that providing common technical standards for similar stations simplifies the manufacturing and licensing process. We note however, that except for LTTS,
fixed stations under Part 101 have not been eligible for new licenses in the 12,700- 13,200 MHz portion of the band since 1983. 48 These stations were designed and have been operating for the last 19 years or more
with the 50 dBW limit. Thus, we see no reason to modify that limit for these stations. We will increase the EIRP limit to 55 dBW for all FS stations in the 13,200- 13,250 MHz portion of the band. Further, we
note that the rules for common carriers in the LTTS specify that they are subject to the technical rules of Parts 74 and 78 49 in certain frequency bands shared with BAS and CARS. Therefore, they also will be
subject to the higher 55 dBW limit we are adopting for fixed stations. To avoid confusion in the rules, we will amend Section 101.807 to clearly state that LTTS stations in certain bands shared with BAS and
CARS should follow the power rules of Parts 74 and 78. 50

47 SBE Reply Comments at 4. See also In the Matter of Amendment of the Commission’s Rules to Allocate
Spectrum for, and to Establish other Rules and Policies Pertaining to, a Radiodetermination Satellite Service, FCC 85- 388, Gen. Docket No. 84- 689, RM- 4426; Policies and Procedures for Licensing of Space and Earth Stations in

the Radiodetermination Satellite Service, Gen. Docket No. 84- 690; Application of Geostar Corporation For Authority to Construct, Launch and Operate Space Stations in the Radiodetermination Satellite Service, File Nos.
2191- DSS- P/ L- 83, 2192- DSS- P/ L- 83, 2193- DSS- P/ L- 83, 2194- DSS- P/ L- 83; a Request to Allocate the 1606.8- 1613.8 MHz band on a Primary Basis to the Radio Astronomy Service, RM- 4839; Report and Order, 50 FR 39101
(Sep. 27, 1985), at ¶¶ 18- 19.
48 See 47 C. F. R. § 101.147( a), note 22 which prohibits new permanent fixed point- to- point facilities in the 12.7- 13.2
GHz band.
49 47 C. F. R. 101.803( b).

50 We will also update the references in Section 101.803( b) to Sections 78.18( a)( 7) and (a)( 8), to conform with their
redesignation as Sections 78.18( a)( 6) and (a)( 7). See In the Matter of Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, and 25 of the Commission’s Rules to Redesignate the 27.5- 29.5 GHz Frequency Band, to Reallocate the 29.5- 30.0 GHz

Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, Second Report and Order, Order or Reconsideration, and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC
Docket No. 92- 297, 12 FCC Rcd 12545 (FCC 97- 82) (1997), at ¶ 104 and Appendix A, Final Rules.
13
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
14
32. We further find that maintaining the same EIRP limits for digital and analog systems is appropriate because, although digital systems would normally require less EIRP to operate, lowering their
maximum EIRP could render them more susceptible to interference from higher powered analog systems. Finally, regarding BAS station operations at 2483.5- 2500 MHz, we agree with Globalstar that the new
EIRP limits should not apply to grandfathered systems. Accordingly, in the final rules set forth in Appendix A, we are specifying that only the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band is available for BAS stations. We
note, however, that this action in no way affects the continued rights of grandfathered BAS stations in the 2483.5- 2500 MHz band, as described in footnote NG147 of the Table of Frequency Allocations. 51

4. Emission Masks
33. Emission masks serve to maximize spectrum efficiency by permitting reasonable and practical information transfer within a channel and at the same time limiting out- of- band emissions to

minimize adjacent channel interference. Our rules contain a number of emission masks tailored to specific operations and channel sizes. For example, different emission masks are authorized under Parts
74, 78, and 101. 52 Although the same equipment is often certified and used by licensees in different services, our rules, in some cases, allow each service to use a different emission mask for the same type of
emission (e. g., FM, AM, etc.) in the same frequency band. 53 The Commission in the Notice proposed to make the FM and digital modulation emission mask requirements for BAS consistent with the
requirements for FS in Part 101 and proposed to adopt standard measurement procedures to measure emissions. Additionally, the Commission proposed to grandfather existing equipment authorized
pursuant to current emission masks. Specifically, the Notice proposed the following:
TV BAS € For FM modulation in all TV BAS frequency bands, to eliminate the FM emission mask of Section

74.637( a) and to apply the FM emission mask of Section 74.637( c)( 1) (same as Section 101.111( a)( 1)). 54 The emission mask in paragraph (c)( 1) would provide equipment manufacturers
more flexibility in the design of equipment because it permits the out- of- band emissions to be attenuated at a slightly slower rate. Such flexibility can be gained without compromising the
interference potential of these transmitters because we believe that the specified attenuation is sufficient to protect adjacent channel operations;
€ For digital modulation in TV BAS frequency bands above 15 GHz , to apply the emission mask for digital modulation in Section 74.637( c)( 2) (same as Section 101.111( a)( 2)( ii)) (no change from
current rules);

51 47 C. F. R. § 2.106.
52 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.462, 74.535, 74.637, 78.103, and 101.111.
53 We note that it is common for a single transmitter to be certificated for use in Parts 74, 78, and 101.
54 The FM emission mask specified in Sections 74.637( a) and 74.637( c)( 1) differs slightly in the attenuation
schedules they specify. The emission mask of paragraph (a) specifies attenuations of 25 dB, 35 dB, and 43+ 10 Log( Power) dB on frequencies removed from the assigned frequency by more than 50% and up to 100%, by

more than 100% and up to 150%, and by more than 150%, respectively. The emission mask of paragraph (c)( 1) specifies the same attenuations, but the corresponding frequencies on which they apply are those removed from the
assigned frequency by more than 50% and up to 100%, by more than 100% and up to 250%, and by more than 250%, respectively. Also, the emission mask of paragraph (c)( 1) specifies that attenuations of greater than 80 dB
are not required.
14
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
15
€ For digital modulation in all TV BAS frequency bands below 15 GHz, to apply the emission mask for digital modulation in Section 101.111( a)( 2)( i);
€ For vestigial sideband amplitude modulation in all TV BAS frequency bands, to apply the emission mask for vestigial sideband amplitude modulation in Section 74.637( c)( 3) (no change from current
rules); and € For all other types of modulation in all TV BAS frequency bands, to apply the emission mask of
Section 74.637( b) (no change from current rules).
Aural BAS € For FM modulation in all aural BAS frequency bands, to eliminate the FM emission mask of Section

74.535( a) and to apply the FM emission mask of Section 74.535( e)( 1) (same as Section 101.111( a)( 1)). As with the choice of emission mask for TV BAS, the emission mask of paragraph
(e)( 1) would provide equipment manufactures more flexibility in equipment design than the emission mask of paragraph (a);
€ For digital modulation in aural BAS frequency bands above 15 GHz, to apply the emission mask for digital modulation in Section 74.535( e)( 2) (same as Section 101.111( a)( 2)( ii)) (no change from
current rules); € For digital modulation in aural BAS frequency bands below 15 GHz, to apply the emission mask for
digital modulation in Section 101.111( a)( 2)( i); and € For all other types of modulation in all aural BAS frequency bands, to apply the emission mask of
Section 74.535( b) (no change from current rules). 55
34. We also sought comment on the proper emission mask to apply to equipment that multiplexes both analog and digital signals for transmission over a single channel. 56 Such operation

complicates the equipment certification process because the emission masks are referenced to either analog or digital modulation techniques, but not both. We proposed to adopt for BAS, the same rule used
under Part 101; 57 that is a transmitter is considered to be using digital modulation techniques, and must meet those emission requirements, when digital modulation occupies 50% or more of the total peak
frequency deviation of a transmitted radio frequency carrier. 58 Another issue we sought comment on involved the characterization of analog/ digital multiplexed transmitters with respect to the assignment of
emission designators. We proposed that hybrid radios that multiplex analog and digital signals continue to use a single emission designator. 59 In making this proposal, we acknowledged that when using hybrid
equipment, digital and analog emissions may exist side- by- side within a channel. However, we also stated that the ULS is not designed to capture multiple emissions within a channel when those emissions
only partially occupy the channel. However, we also stated that the information was indirectly available because ULS collects transmitter manufacturer and model number – interested parties could use this
information to determine the emissions within a channel.

55 Notice at ¶¶ 27- 32.
56 For example, as TV stations transition to DTV, they generally will maintain their existing analog station until
such time that the DTV transition is complete. During the transition, these stations may transmit both analog and digital signals from remote locations back to the studio and over STLs, and these two signals may be multiplexed

and transmitted over a common channel simultaneously.
57 47 C. F. R. § 101.141( b).

58 Notice at ¶ 31.
59 Id. at ¶ 32.
15
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
16
35. APTS/ PBS support the proposals standardizing emission masks. 60 MSTV/ NAB support the goal of conforming BAS emission mask with Part 101, but urge input from broadcasters and
equipment manufacturers before finalizing rules for BAS FM emission masks with slower attenuation rates. MSTV/ NAB further recommend that the Commission not adopt digital emission masks for the 2
GHz band until the industry has settled on a specific digital technology. 61 Red River Broadcast Co. LLC and KQDS Acquisition Corp. (Red River) support the rule revisions proposed for emission masks for
BAS, but emphasize that existing equipment must be grandfathered indefinitely to avert a substantial economic impact on their operations. 62 SBE states that Part 74 and Part 101 emission masks should be
consistent, but defers to equipment manufacturers regarding the specific emission masks that should be used.

36. One commenter, MRC, which manufactures a dual carrier digital/ FM analog transmitter, provides extensive comment on emission masks for composite systems, such as its TwinStream radio. 63
MRC argues that its composite system is analogous to an analog/ digital multiplexed system and as such should be treated similarly. It supports our proposal to require compliance with the digital emission mask
when the digital modulation occupies 50% or more of the total peak deviation of a system carrying analog FM and digital signals multiplexed together and suggest that the same rule should apply to composite
systems. Therefore, because the analog portion of the signal transmitted by the TwinStream radio occupies 60% of the channel, 64 they propose that only the FM emission mask of Section 74.637( c)( 1) or
Section 74.637( a) should apply. 65 Likewise, MRC also requests that ENG systems below 15 GHz that are selectable for either analog or digital modulation only meet the requirements of the FM emission mask of
Section 74.637( a). 66
37. MRC also comments on the appropriate emission mask to apply to ENG radios using Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (COFDM). 67 They argue that the more flexible FM

emission mask of Section 74.637( a) rather than the digital emission mask of Section 101.111( a)( 2) should
60 APTS/ PBS Comments at 4.
61 MSTV/ NAB Comments at 7.
62 Red River Comments at 1- 1.
63 MRC’s composite radio is sold as the TwinStream radio. This radio uses two separate carriers – one to transmit
an analog NTSC signal (approximately 15 megahertz bandwidth) and one to transmit a digital ATSC signal (approximately 7.5 megahertz bandwidth). These carriers are offset from the center frequency of the channel and

the analog and digital signals are transmitted side- by- side. See MRC Comments at 4- 5; MRC Reply Comments at 3- 4; MRC Ex Parte filing of April 3, 2002, at 2- 5; and MRC Ex Parte filing of April 18, 2002, at 2.

64 The analog signal is approximately 15 megahertz wide and the channel is 25 megahertz wide; 15/ 25 = 0.6.
65 MRC contends, however, that the analog and digital portions of the TwinStream composite signal individually
meet the existing FM (Section 74.637( a)) and digital (Section 101.111( a)( 2)) emission masks. See MRC Ex Parte filing of April 3, 2002, at 2; MRC Ex Parte filing of April 18, 2002, at 2.

66 MRC Ex Parte filing of April 3, 2002, at 5.
67 Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (COFDM) is a modulation scheme that divides a single
digital signal across 1,000 or more signal carriers simultaneously (FDM). The signals are coded to take advantage of forward error correction techniques and are spaced at precise frequencies which prevents the demodulators from

seeing frequencies other than their own (hence, orthogonal) so they do not interfere with each other.
16
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
17
apply. They claim that the more stringent digital mask would require COFDM ENG transmitters when using complex modulation methods for the individual carriers to operate at lower power levels to avoid
intermodulation 68 products that exceed the mask. 69 Thus, they state that they must reduce power, which reduces range, to operate in the linear region of the amplifier to meet the digital emission mask. 70 MRC
also claims that the same relief is needed for single- carrier digital systems at 2 GHz to accommodate the 12- 17 megahertz bandwidth reductions required due to the reallocation of the 1990- 2025 MHz band to
MSS.
38. Many commenters also addressed the issue of the proper emission designator to apply to hybrid analog/ digital systems. APTS/ PBS assert that a dual emission designator should be used to

characterize a hybrid analog/ digital system. 71 SBE agrees and observes that hybrid FM and digital video links clearly exhibit dual emissions. Therefore, they should be required to exhibit separate frequencies
and emission designators for each emission, rather than using a single emission designator such as F9W. 72 In contrast, MRC supports the continued use of a single emission designator for multiplexed analog and
digital signals because such a system multiplexes two baseband systems and transmits them using a single transmitter. Thus, MRC contends that a single emission designator is proper. 73 SBE also asks the
Commission to clarify the correct emission designator to apply to COFDM modulation. 74 Finally, MRC asks the Commission to consider eliminating the collection of emission types for digital systems because

68 Intermodulation is the production of frequencies corresponding to the sum and difference frequencies of the
fundamentals and/ or harmonics which occurs when the frequencies are mixed in a nonlinear element of a system. Intermodulation products are characterized by their order, where the nth order products are generated by n iterations

of frequencies. For example, for frequencies f1 and f2, the 2 nd order products are: f2 +f1 and f2 - f1; and the 3 rd order products are: 2f2 + f1, 2f2- f1, 2f1 + f2, and 2f1 - f2. In the case of COFDM, these intermodulation products
could be generated due to interactions between any of the many carrier (fundamental) frequencies being used. Because each carrier must be located within the limits of the emission mask, 3 rd order products may fall either
within the emission mask or just outside of it. For example, if f2 is a frequency near the upper end of the emission mask, a 3 rd order product of 2f2 – f1 is a higher frequency than f2 and may be outside of the emission mask.

69 MRC Ex Parte filing of April 18, 2002, at 3.
70 Id.
71 APTS/ PBS Comments at 4.
72 See 47 C. F. R. § 2.201. Emissions are designated according to their classification and necessary bandwidth. A
minimum of three symbols are used to describe the basic characteristics of the radio emission. The first symbol designates the type of modulation. For example, “F” is used for frequency modulation. The second symbol

designates the nature of the signal modulating the main carrier. For example, “7” is used for two or more channels containing quantized or digital information. The third symbol designates the type of information to be transmitted.
For example, “F” is used for television (video) information. In the case above, the emission type F9W refers to modulation where the main carrier is frequency modulated, indicated by “F” as the first symbol; the signal
modulating the main carrier is a composite of one or more channels containing quantized or digital modulation, together with one or more channels containing analog information, indicated by “9” as the second symbol; and the
type of information being transmitted is a combination of data, telephony (including sound broadcasting), and/ or television (video), indicated by “W” in the third symbol.

73 MRC Reply Comments at 2- 3.
74 SBE Comments at 6- 7.
17
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
18
their emission type no longer serves a useful purpose as all digital signals exhibit similar emission spectra. 75
39. Discussion. Commenters generally did not address our proposals to standardize the emission masks between Part 74 and Part 101. Most comments addressed nuances of the rules, such as
how they apply to composite systems. On the specific emission masks proposed, the comments received were supportive. Only MSTV/ NAB caution against adopting a digital emission mask for the 2 GHz band
at this time due to the lack of standards among manufacturers. We are mindful of MSTV/ NAB’s concerns. However, we believe that maintaining the status quo in the 2 GHz band would harm the
industry more than help it. By providing certainty to manufactures and users regarding equipment, we believe that the industry will be able to move forward and begin making wide scale use of digital
equipment to increase spectral efficiency and to ensure that equipment is available for broadcasters as they transition to DTV. Accordingly, we adopt our proposals to amend the Part 74 aural and TV BAS
emission masks to make them consistent with the emission masks of Part 101. As stated in the Notice, imposing a single set of standards across shared frequency bands will simplify the manufacturing and
equipment authorization processes. Additionally, consistent rules will provide a level of certainty to licensees regarding the expected RF environment, minimize the potential of harmful interference and
simplify the frequency coordination process. In addition, we adopt our proposal to grandfather existing equipment, and will do so for existing equipment and equipment of current production lines authorized,
via certification or verification pursuant to the current emission standards, up to two years after the adoption of this Report and Order, and for stations authorized to use such equipment pursuant to an
application filed up to two years after the adoption of this Report and Order. 76 However, any such non-conforming equipment replaced on or after two years after the adoption of this Report and Order must be
replaced by conforming equipment.
40. MRC also asks that we allow COFDM ENG systems to use the analog FM emission mask rather than the more stringent digital mask. The basis of this request is MRC’s claim that FCC rules

limit the power amplifier’s rated capacity, causing operation to occur in the non- linear region of the amplifier. They state that this produces intermodulation products that exceed the digital emission mask.
We note that our rules limit the output power of mobile ENG systems. However there is no rule that restricts the ability of a manufacturer to design an amplifier that is linear up to the maximum output
power. Further, the use of the analog emission mask would provide less adjacent channel protection than the digital emission mask and harm the ability of licensees to operate in a spectrally efficient manner.
Accordingly, we deny MRC’s request and will require COFDM systems to meet the emission limitations of the digital mask. We will grandfather existing equipment and equipment of current production lines
for two years consistent with our decision above. Finally, we clarify that the correct emission type for COFDM is W7D.

41. MRC, the only commenter to address the issue of hybrid digital/ analog systems, supports our proposal to apply the digital mask to such systems if the digital traffic is 50% or more of the total

75 MRC Comments at 4- 5.
76 This is consistent with the grandfather provisions adopted in WT Docket No. 00- 19 where the digital emission
mask was modified. See Amendment of Part 101 of the Commission’s Rules to Streamline Processing of Microwave Applications in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Telecommunications Industry Association Petition for

Rulemaking, Report and Order, WT Docket No. 00- 19 and RM- 9418, (FCC 02- 218) (rel. July 31, 2002) at ¶ 48.
18
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
19
peak deviation. 77 We will adopt this proposal. In addition, MRC raises questions regarding the treatment of composite digital/ analog systems. Similar to hybrid systems, we will apply the appropriate analog or
digital emission mask based on the percentage of the channel that carries a digital signal. Specifically, this percentage will be calculated as the system’s digital necessary bandwidth divided by the aggregate
necessary bandwidth. 78 For purposes of equipment authorization and licensing, the output power and EIRP of a composite system will be its aggregate output power and EIRP. 79 Both composite and hybrid
systems will ease the transition to DTV as they provide a migration path for licensees to transition from an analog NTSC signal to a dual analog/ digital (NTSC/ ATSC) signal, and eventually to only a digital
signal. We believe that the procedures we are adopting will simplify and advance the transition to DTV while protecting the ability of coordinators to engineer systems.

42. Similar to their request for COFDM systems, MRC asks that we require selectable digital/ analog ENG systems to meet only the analog emission mask. We decline this request. Because
only one signal is being transmitted at a time, this system is neither a hybrid nor a composite. Thus, each emission must be assessed individually – analog emissions must meet the analog mask and digital
emissions must meet the digital mask. We will grandfather existing equipment and equipment of current production lines consistent with our decision above.

43. Several commenters address the issue of appropriate emission designators for a hybrid analog/ digital multiplexed signal. APTS/ PBS and SBE ask that a hybrid system be characterized by a
dual emission designator. MRC supports the continued use of a single emission designator for such systems. We agree. As MRC observes, a hybrid system multiplexes an analog and digital signal and
transmits a single signal containing the two. Thus, in this case, because a single signal is being transmitted, we believe it to be appropriate that a single emission designator be used. We similarly
believe that a single emission designator is appropriate for composite systems. This will conform the emission mask for hybrid and composite systems which will simplify manufacturing processes,
equipment authorization, and licensing for these spectrally efficient systems. We are mindful of SBE and APTS/ PBS’s concerns that a single emission designator for these systems will complicate frequency
coordination because coordinators will not know the exact operating parameters. However, we disagree. The ULS captures transmitter manufacturer and model number for BAS transmitters. Thus coordinators
can use this information to determine the frequency offset, power, bandwidth, and other technical and operational details of the individual analog or digital channels of a particular system. Moreover,
interference protection criteria for specific composite systems may be obtained from manufacturers, as they are for other systems. 80

77 For purposes of this discussion, we will refer to a system that frequency modulates a single RF carrier with digital
and analog signals frequency- division- multiplexed in its baseband, resulting in a single distinct, symmetrical FM emission, as a “hybrid” analog/ digital (or digital/ analog) system. We will refer to a system that modulates two

separate RF carriers with analog and digital signals resulting in two distinct emissions, one analog and the other digital, as a “composite” dual channel analog/ digital (or digital/ analog) system.

78 This method is suggested by MRC’s calculation that their composite signal as 68% analog. See MRC Comments
at 4; MRC Ex Parte Filing of April 3, 2002, at 2- 5.
79 For example, a composite dual channel system comprising an analog channel of output power 27 dBm and a
digital channel of output power 33 dBm would specify its aggregate output power as 34 dBm, representing the sum of the two powers.

80 See, e. g., MRC Reply Comments at 2- 3. MRC provides C/ I ratios required to protect MRC’s composite dual
channel analog/ digital system from like systems and analog FM systems.
19
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
20
44. To determine the emission designator for a composite system, we will use the aggregate necessary bandwidth of the system, which is comprised of the analog necessary bandwidth, any band
between the analog and digital signals, and the digital necessary bandwidth. 81 The emission designator will also use the appropriate emission type, such as F9F or F9W, 82 indicating that the system
accommodates at least one analog and at least one digital signal. We note that licensees who modify their equipment from an analog system to a composite analog/ digital system, must also modify their station
authorization to show the new emission type using ULS. 83 Under the rules, such a change would be considered major and require a new frequency coordination. 84

45. We did not receive any comments with regard to our proposals for standardized measurement procedures. We continue to believe that our procedures should ensure that all equipment is
measured consistently. Therefore, for measuring compliance with the emission mask, for emissions removed from the center frequency by 250% of the emission bandwidth or less, we will permit a
reduction of the measurement reference bandwidth below the mask reference bandwidth to a value not less than 1% of the emission bandwidth, or the next higher measurement bandwidth available. 85 This will
allow for more accurate emissions measurements just outside the edge of the emission bandwidth, which might otherwise be blurred by the contribution of much greater emissions within the emission bandwidth.
For measurements outside this range, we will use the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) guidelines of a 100 kHz resolution bandwidth for systems operating on frequencies below 1 GHz and a 1

81 For example, a composite dual channel system comprising an analog channel of necessary bandwidth 17 MHz
and a digital channel of necessary bandwidth 7 MHz, with a 1 MHz band separating the two channels, would specify its aggregate necessary bandwidth as 25 MHz, representing the sum of the bandwidths, i. e., the bandwidth

from the outer edge of the analog necessary bandwidth to the outer edge of the digital necessary bandwidth. The digital percentage of such a system would be calculated as the ratio of the system’s digital necessary bandwidth, 7
MHz, divided by its aggregate necessary bandwidth, 25 MHz, or 7/ 25 * 100% = 28%. Since this system would be less than 50% digital, it would be subject to the FM emission mask, not the digital emission mask.

82 The appropriate emission type will always contain a “9” as the second symbol.
83 For example, to modify from an analog FM video operation to a composite dual channel analog/ digital video
operation, an existing analog FM video authorization, bearing an emission type of F3F representing a single FM video channel, would have to be modified to show an emission designator such as F9F, representing

accommodation of one or more analog channels and one or more digital channels (indicated by a "9" as the second symbol) transmitting video information (indicated by an "F" as the third symbol), or F9W, representing
accommodation of one or more analog channels and one or more digital channels transmitting a combination of video, data, or telephony information (indicated by a "W" as the third symbol). See 47 C. F. R. § 2.201. Whether the
composite system were determined by the method described above to require adherence to the analog emission mask or to the digital emission mask, its emission type would nonetheless continue to represent its accommodation
of both analog and digital channels (indicated by a "9" as the second symbol), not the accommodation of analog-only channels (which could be indicated by a "3" or an "8" as the second symbol), or digital- only channels (which
could be indicated by a "1"," 2", or "7" as the second symbol).
84 In the above example, the change in emission type from F3F to F9F or to F9W would, as any change in emission
type, be classified as a major change under 47 C. F. R. § 1.929( d).
85 This option may be especially useful where the mask reference bandwidth is less than or slightly greater than the
necessary bandwidth of the transmitter. For example, in a case where the system is analog, and the mask reference bandwidth is thus 100 kHz, but the necessary bandwidth of the system is 80 kHz, the measurement bandwidth may

be adjusted down to 1 kHz, which is the next higher measurement bandwidth above 1% of 80 kHz, or 0.80 kHz.
20
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
21
MHz resolution bandwidth for systems operating on frequencies above 1 GHz. 86 We realize that this may create a situation where the emissions mask reference bandwidth stated in the rule is less than the
measurement resolution bandwidth. 87 If this occurs, there could be some blurring of spectral spikes that might otherwise be detected. We believe that the benefits of simplification and standardization outweigh
the potential for such effects to result in interference to adjacent channels. Further, to protect adjacent channel operations, we will require that the emission mask attenuation requirement be corrected to
decrease with the ratio of measurement resolution bandwidth to mask reference bandwidth, i. e., by a factor of 10 log10( Bres/ Bref), where Bres is the measurement resolution bandwidth and Bref is the emissions
mask reference bandwidth in the rule. 88 Finally, we note that the analog FM emission mask does not specify a mask reference bandwidth, which, in conjunction with the measurement resolution bandwidth,
could be used to calculate the correction. However, it is the policy of the Commission's Laboratory Division, which approves equipment authorizations, to require the use of a mask reference bandwidth of
100 kHz for this mask. Accordingly, we are therefore amending the analog FM emission mask for Part 74 TV and aural BAS to reflect a 100 kHz emission mask reference bandwidth.

5. Automatic Transmit Power Control
46. Automatic transmit power control (ATPC), is a function that provides for more efficient spectrum use by ensuring that the transmitter only uses the power necessary to maintain reliable

communications. Radios that use ATPC operate with certain power levels during normal propagation conditions. When the receiver detects a drop in received signal level, due to multipath 89 or a rain fade, for
example, the receiver sends a signal to the transmitter to gradually increase power. When the received signal level begins to rise, the receiver sends a signal to the transmitter to reduce power. By operating in
this manner, interference levels into nearby microwave paths are reduced and more frequencies can be coordinated and used in any given geographic area. Additionally, by keeping signal levels low, ATPC
reduces power consumption of the radio, which lowers operating costs and increases equipment reliability. The Commission proposed in the Notice that TV BAS, aural BAS, and CARS licensees be
permitted to use ATPC.
47. Commenting parties strongly support the ATPC proposal set forth in the Notice. 90 Comsearch states that ATPC should be allowed for digital BAS and CARS microwave systems because it

is commonly used and simplifies frequency coordination. It recommends that ATPC use be coordinated

86 See International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio Regulations, Appendix 3, Table of Maximum Permitted
Spurious Emission Power Levels, at 10; ITU Recommendation ITU- R SM. 329- 9, Spurious Emissions, at 4.1 and at Annex 2, 1.1.2.

87 For example, for a digital system operating below 15 GHz, the emissions mask reference bandwidth stated in the
rule is 4 kHz, less than the measurement resolution bandwidths of 1 MHz for frequencies above 1 GHz and 100 kHz for frequencies below 1 GHz.

88 Using a wider resolution bandwidth allows more energy to enter the measurement device. Thus, the displayed
signal will generally appear at a higher level that it otherwise would.
89 Multipath is a propagation phenomenon that results in radio signals reaching the receiving antenna by two or
more paths. Causes of multipath include reflection from terrestrial objects, such as mountains and buildings.
90 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 5; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 8; Comsearch Comments at 4; MRC Comments at 8;
TIA Reply Comments at 3.
21
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
22
in accordance with the procedures of TIA TSB 10- F, 91 “Interference Criteria for Microwave Systems.” 92 TIA supports this recommendation. 93
48. Discussion. As proposed in the Notice, we will permit TV BAS, aural BAS, and CARS licensees to use ATPC and, as suggested by commenters, we encourage using TIA TSB 10- F guidelines.
While the benefits of using ATPC for BAS may not be as great in other services because BAS generally uses one- way, rather than two- way, communications, the benefits can still be significant. For those
stations using two- way communications, ATPC will permit more systems to be frequency coordinated, thus promoting the maximum utilization of spectrum. With respect to TIA TSB 10- F, we recognize the
value of standardized, industry- wide frequency coordination guidelines, and address this issue in Section III. A. 7 below.

6. Interference to Geostationary Satellites
49. In 1987, the Commission adopted rules to implement Article 27 of the ITU Radio Regulations, 94 which specifies EIRP limits and antenna pointing parameters for fixed terrestrial stations

that share frequency bands with fixed satellite uplink (Earth- to- space) stations. 95 These limits are designed to protect geostationary satellites from interference by limiting the amount of RF radiation that a
terrestrial system can transmit directly towards a satellite. Since adoption of these rules, additional frequency bands have been allocated for satellite use and the Radio Regulations have been updated
accordingly.
50. Because these rules are subject to international agreement, maintaining them in multiple rule parts is cumbersome and has led to varying requirements in Parts 74, 78, and 101. To remedy this

situation, the Commission proposed to simplify the organization of the geostationary satellite protection rules by eliminating duplicative rule sections. Therefore, the Notice proposed that the technical rules for
protecting geostationary satellites from interference from terrestrial systems be maintained in Part 101, and that Parts 74 and 78 merely state that licensees must comply with the geostationary satellites
protection rules contained in Part 101.
51. All parties commenting on this issue strongly support the Commission’s proposals to consolidate and reference in Part 101 existing Parts 74 and 78 rules limiting RF radiation directed toward

geostationary satellites. 96 Comsearch also recommends the deletion of Section 78.105( a)( 4), which it

91 Interference Criteria for Microwave Systems, Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA)
Telecommunications Systems Bulletin TSB 10- F, dated June 1, 1994, available on line from the TIA at www. tiaonline. org.

92 Comsearch Comments at 4.
93 TIA Reply Comments at 3.
94 Under the revised numbering scheme for the Radio Regulations, these regulations are now contained in Article
21.
95 See Establishment of a Spectrum Utilization Policy for the Fixed and Mobile Services Use of Certain Bands
Between 947 MHz and 40 GHz, Gen. Docket No. 82- 334, Third Report And Order, 2 FCC Rcd 1050 (1987).
96 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 5; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 9; Comsearch Comments at 4; NSMA Comments at 2;
TIA Reply Comments at 3.
22
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
23
contends, is redundant with Section 78.106 because both sections address antenna restrictions regarding the geostationary satellite orbit (GSO).
52. Discussion. We are adopting our proposal to consolidate in Part 101 any Parts 74 and 78 technical rules that pertain to protecting geostationary satellites from interference from terrestrial systems.
This action will decrease redundancy in our rules and ensure that future changes to GSO protection requirements are consistent across affected services. In this connection, we will update the frequencies
listed in Section 101.145( b) and (c) to encompass the BAS and CARS bands subject to RF radiation limits directed towards satellites. We note that this will result in the addition of the frequency band 6875-
7075 MHz to Section 101.145( b) and the frequency band 12.75- 13.25 GHz to Section 101.145( c). Additionally, as suggested by Comsearch, we are deleting Section 78.105( a)( 4), which restricts CARS
antenna orientation to prevent interference to GSO satellites in the 12.70- 12.75 GHz band, as these protections are redundant with those afforded by Section 78.106( b) for the larger 12.70- 13.25 GHz band.

7. Frequency Coordination
53. Currently, Parts 74 and 78 of the Commission’s rules for TV BAS and CARS require that the frequency coordination procedures of Part 101 be used for assignments in the 6425- 6525 MHz and

17.7- 19.7 GHz bands. 97 The Part 101 procedures generally require parties to coordinate their planned spectrum use with potentially affected parties prior to filing a license application. Additionally, the TV
BAS and CARS rules specify identical interference protection criteria for the 12,700- 13,250 MHz band. Such rules are necessary to promote spectrum efficiency and to minimize the potential for any system to
cause harmful interference to other systems in the same frequency band. In the Part 101 Order, the Commission amended its rules to conform the frequency coordination procedures for microwave systems
to TIA industry standards and to apply these standards to all microwave bands. 98
54. In the Notice, the Commission proposed to require that all prospective applicants in frequency bands above 1990 MHz for TV BAS and CARS coordinate their planned spectrum use prior to

filing applications, using the procedures of Section 101.103( d). Further, in order that applicants and licensees can easily locate the coordination rules, the Notice proposed to amend Section 78.36 to mirror
the Part 101 coordination rules. The Notice requested that commenters address whether a frequency coordination requirement should be imposed uniformly across the United States or only applied to the
most heavily congested markets. Additionally, the Notice requested comment on whether aural BAS stations operating above 944 MHz should also adhere to the procedures of Section 101.103( d). 99

55. Comments were mixed on the proposals set forth in the Notice. A number of parties support using Section 101.103( d) procedures, 100 while SBE and Viacom oppose using those procedures. 101
APTS/ PBS support these procedures and assert that prior coordination should be required uniformly

97 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.638 and 78.36.
98 See Part 101 Order, supra, at 13,486.
99 Notice at ¶¶ 38- 40.
100 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 5- 6; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 7; Comsearch Comments at 5; MRC Comments at
3- 4; NSMA Comments at 2; TIA Reply Comments at 3.
101 See SBE Comments at 8- 9; Viacom Reply Comments at 2.
23
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
24
across the U. S. 102 MSTV/ NAB support Section 101.103( d) procedures for fixed operations, but contend that TV pick- up for ENG should follow existing ad- hoc, local frequency coordination procedures, which
permit frequency coordination on a near real time basis. 103 NSMA supports Section 101.103( d) coordination as proposed, arguing that that it works well to protect both terrestrial and satellite
communications. NSMA urges that the 12.7- 13.25 GHz band be included in these requirements. 104
56. SBE opposes the adoption of Section 101.103( d) coordination procedures for BAS in the 950 MHz, 2 GHz, 2.5 GHz, 7 GHz, and 13 GHz bands, asserting that the Part 101 process would be

unnecessarily complex and burdensome. It favors rules that keep the existing less formal BAS frequency coordination procedures, but would add a requirement that applicants provide evidence of frequency
coordination for fixed point- to- point systems. 105 In this connection, SBE recommends interference ratios and criteria for use in frequency coordination. 106 SBE expresses particular concern that frequency
coordinators will not take into account patterns of mobile use, with the result that mobile use may be disrupted by new fixed facilities. Further, SBE asserts that because ENG operations are generally
coordinated in real time or near real time, formal Section 101.103( d) procedures would not work. 107 Viacom agrees with SBE in opposing the adoption of Part 101 prior coordination procedures for BAS. 108

57. KNME- TV (KNME) supports the proposed adoption of Part 101 prior coordination procedures for all TV BAS stations to prevent interference and abuse. It contends that a lack of frequency
coordination has resulted in widespread abuse and a general disregard of the voluntary process. KNME recommends that frequency coordination be imposed uniformly across the country, including rural
areas. 109
58. MRC supports prior coordination for fixed links, but argues that non- fixed links should be exempted in favor of the existing local frequency coordination process, which it contends is working

well. MRC also supports the adoption, for BAS, of criteria in Section 101.105( c) and consequently TIA TSB 10- F, which provide guidelines for applying and developing interference protection criteria, because
they are consistent with the existing Section 74.638 in establishing a minimum adjacent channel interference C/ I ratio of 56 dB. MRC states that this ratio exceeds the ratio required by MRC’s

102 APTS/ PBS Comments at 5- 6.
103 MSTV/ NAB Comments at 7- 8.
104 NSMA Comments at 2- 3.
105 SBE Comments at 8- 9.
106 SBE Comments at 1- 2. SBE suggests a co- channel D/ U ratio of 60 dB, or, alternatively, an undesired signal
strength 10 dB below the noise threshold of the receiver, for any type of modulation, and adjacent channel D/ U ratios of 10 dB or, alternatively, equipment tests, for digital into analog systems, and 0 dB for analog into analog

systems.
107 SBE Reply Comments at 5- 7.

108 Viacom Reply Comments at 2- 3.
109 KNME Reply Comments at 1.
24
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
25
TwinStream radio. 110
59. Globalstar urges the adoption of rules requiring coordination of BAS and CARS with non- geostationary satellite orbit (NGSO) MSS user uplinks allocated in the 2 GHz band and feeder

downlinks proposed to be allocated under ET 98- 142 in the 7 GHz band. 111 SBE calls Globalstar’s proposals to protect NGSO MSS feeder downlinks from TV Pickup operation in the 7 GHz band
premature because MSS feeder downlinks have not yet been allowed under ET Docket 98- 142. 112
60. Discussion. Based on the comments, we are adopting frequency coordination procedures for all TV and aural BAS and CARS frequency bands. The rules being adopted herein will require all

fixed stations, except for those in the 1990- 2110 MHz band, to use the frequency coordination procedures of Section 101.103( d). For mobile BAS and CARS, we will maintain the use of Section 101.103( d)
procedures in those bands where it is currently required (i. e., 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz) 113 and flexibly permit use of Section 101.103( d) or local coordination procedures for the 2450- 2483.5 MHz,
6875- 7125 MHz, and 12,700- 13,250 MHz bands. For all other mobile BAS and CARS stations, we will continue to allow mobile stations to coordinate locally. In the 1990- 2110 MHz band, we will maintain
the current system which allows for local coordination of all stations. The rules will be applied uniformly across the United States for both urban and rural environments. 114

61. We find that Section 101.103( d) prior coordination procedures are appropriate for fixed BAS and CARS applications, except as explained below for the 1990- 2110 MHz band. Uniform
procedures for bands shared among these services, are necessary to ensure as much protection as possible to stations while minimizing the possibility of stations to cause or receive harmful interference. SBE is
concerned that fixed station coordinators will not take into account mobile station use, but we do not share this concern. To properly coordinate a station, frequency coordinators must incorporate and plan
for mobile stations as well as other fixed stations. To do otherwise would ignore the operating environment and do a disservice to the coordinator’s client, who could be at risk if mobile use patterns are

110 MRC Comments at 3- 4. See also MRC Reply Comments at 2- 3. MRC also notes that TIA TSB 10- F provides
for the consideration of interference thresholds unique to the equipment and interference configuration, and, in this connection, provides detailed interference ratios needed to protect its TwinStream radio.

111 Globalstar Comments at 3- 7. See Amendment of Parts 2, 25 and 27 of the Commission’s Rules with Regard to
the Mobile- Satellite Service Above 1 GHz, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket No. 98- 142, 13 FCC Rcd 17107 (1998) (MSS Notice). See also Amendment of Parts 2, 25 and 27 of the Commission’s Rules with Regard to

the Mobile- Satellite Service Above 1 GHz, Report and Order, ET Docket No. 98- 142, 17 FCC Rcd 2658 (2002) (MSS Order). The MSS Order recently allocated the band 6700- 7025 MHz for non- Federal Government FSS
downlinks on a co- primary basis, limiting the use of this spectrum to NGSO MSS feeder downlinks. It also established limits on the power flux density produced by the NGSO MSS satellite at the surface of the earth, to
protect terrestrial services; established frequency coordination procedures for the band 6700- 6875 MHz using existing Part 25 and 101 rules; and deferred coordination requirements between combined fixed and mobile
terrestrial operations and satellite operations in the band 6875- 7025 MHz band to a future proceeding. See MSS Order at ¶¶ 4, 39- 60.

112 SBE Reply Comments at 1- 2. We note that the MSS Order has recently allocated the band 6700- 7025 MHz, as
proposed in the MSS Notice, for non- Federal Government FSS downlinks on a co- primary basis, limiting the use of this spectrum to NGSO MSS feeder downlinks. See MSS Order at ¶ 39.

113 47 C. F. R. § 74.638( b).
114 We note that we will reproduce the frequency coordination rules in Part 78 for CARS applicants and licensees.
25
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
26
not taken into account. We believe that the collective needs of the local BAS licensing community to deploy mobile as well as fixed operations in their community will ensure that mobile patterns of use are
fully respected in the selection of fixed frequencies by frequency coordinators under contract to provide service to any prospective BAS licensee in that community. In this connection, we acknowledge the role
local frequency coordinating bodies have played in maintaining order within the BAS bands and encourage licensees to continue consulting with these bodies as they pursue future licensing. SBE asks
that if we implement the Part 101 procedures for BAS, that we require notification of applications to the national SBE Frequency Coordination Director. We decline to require this. We find that such a
procedure could be overly burdensome to applicants and coordinators. Moreover, it is unnecessary, given the involvement of local frequency coordinating bodies in fixed frequency selection, and especially given
that all applications accepted for filing are publicly available through the ULS. The public availability of filing information has worked well in informing FS frequency coordinators of current filings and we
believe it will satisfy the needs of the national SBE Frequency Coordination Director without increasing the filing burden on applicants or coordinators.

62. With respect to mobile TV BAS/ CARS applications, we find that Section 101.103( d) coordination procedures would be unnecessarily burdensome. Given the urgency of ENG operations, and
the long history of successful real time frequency coordination provided by local coordinators, we find that there is little potential that interference would result from its continued function without imposing the
formality of Section 101.103( d) procedures. We therefore decline to adopt rules requiring Section 101.103( d) coordination procedures for mobile TV BAS/ CARS stations for the 2 GHz, 2.5 GHz, 7 GHz,
and 13 GHz bands. Licensees in these bands, except the 2 GHz band discussed below, will have the flexibility to exercise either Section 101.103( d) procedures or local coordination procedures, as
appropriate to the situation. In the 6425- 6525 MHz and 17,700- 19,700 MHz bands, we maintain the existing rules requiring Section 101.103( d) coordination procedures for mobile TV BAS/ CARS, as these
bands are used heavily by FS services as well as BAS/ CARS and subject to the same procedures. We believe that the use of the expeditious verbal notification and response procedures available in Section
101.103( d) has worked well in accommodating mobile users of all services in these shared bands, and to permit different or less formal procedures for BAS/ CARS applicants would be inequitable and could lead
to inconsistency and confusion in frequency coordination. A table summarizing the coordination requirements is provided below.

63. For the 1990- 2110 MHz band, we will continue to maintain procedures which allow for local frequency coordination for all stations – fixed and mobile. In this band, we deviate from the policy
articulated above for fixed stations based on unique circumstances of this band. Specifically, it is used predominantly by mobile TV pickup stations, but also supports some fixed links and it is currently
transitioning to accommodate MSS in the 1990- 2025 MHz portion of the band. Because each area of the United States may transition to MSS at different times, local frequency coordinators may be in the best
position to accommodate requests to local operating conditions. We note that the use of a local coordinator is not mandated and licensees are free to coordinate stations themselves or by going to the
coordinator of choice. SBE asks that under such a scheme, we require evidence of frequency coordination, similar to that required by the procedures of Section 101.103( d). 115 We agree with SBE that
a method of verification is necessary. The rules of Section 101.103( d) have worked well in the past and we adopt a similar requirement here. Thus, we are adopting changes to Sections 74.638 and 78.36 which
supplement local frequency coordination procedures for fixed systems to require the submission of a certification attesting that all co- channel and adjacent- channel licensees and applicants potentially

115 See SBE Comments at 9.
26
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
27
affected by the proposed fixed use of the frequencies have been notified and are in agreement that the proposed facilities can be installed without causing harmful interference to other users. Finally, we do
not find it necessary to require the submission of detailed engineering calculations, as suggested by SBE. 116 The accomplishment of such calculations is inherent to the frequency coordination process. In
this regard, we rely on coordinators to use good engineering judgment when coordinating systems and give deference to their recommendations. Requiring a detailed engineering submission such as that
described is therefore unnecessary.
Frequency Coordination Procedures Existing Requirements New Requirements BAS/ CARS Frequency
Band Fixed and Mobile Fixed Mobile
2 GHz Local Local (no change) Local (no change) 2.5 GHz Local Prior Local or Prior

6.5 GHz Prior Prior (no change) Prior (no change) 7 GHz Local Prior Local or Prior
13 GHz Interference Criteria Prior Local or Prior 18 GHz Prior Prior (no change) Prior (no change)

64. An additional issue related to frequency coordination involves protection standards for stations. MRC asks that we adopt interference criteria for BAS coordination that is similar to the FS
procedures in Sections 101.105( c) and 101.103( d). These criteria incorporate TIA TSB 10- F, or, alternatively, the exercise of good engineering practices or conservative default criteria. SBE, while not
commenting directly on Section 101.105, recommends that coordinators be given flexibility regarding frequency coordination. 117 We note that the Notice discussed the importance of uniform frequency
coordination procedures and standards to simplify coordination in shared bands and minimize the potential of stations causing interference. 118 In this regard, the procedures in Part 101 have served the FS
well in the past, providing a firm and uniform, yet adaptable, basis for engineering systems without harmful interference, while maximizing frequency re- use. Thus, we believe that these same procedures
will similarly benefit BAS and CARS. We note that these criteria are consistent with those already in effect for all BAS and CARS operations in the 12.7- 13.25 GHz band. 119 We are therefore adopting
Section 101.105 interference criteria for use where Section 101.103( d) frequency coordination procedures apply to BAS and CARS.

65. Finally, we decline to consider in this proceeding sharing issues and frequency coordination requirements between BAS/ CARS and MSS. We acknowledge that new coordination
procedures need to be developed for sharing between NGSO MSS user uplinks in the 2 GHz band and downlinks in the 7 GHz band, and BAS and CARS operations. However, those issues will be addressed
in a future proceeding. 120

116 Id. at 8.
117 See MRC Comments at 3- 4; SBE Comments at 8.
118 See Notice at ¶¶ 37- 39.
119 Sections 74.638, 78.36. 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.638, 78.36.
120 See MSS Order at ¶¶ 4, 48- 60.
27
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
28
8. Frequency Tolerance
66. The Notice proposed to amend the frequency tolerance rules for TV BAS. 121 Specifically, consistent with the proposal made in the Part 101 NPRM, 122 the Notice proposed to eliminate separate

frequency tolerance requirements for base and mobile operations. Additionally, the Notice proposed to adopt a frequency tolerance of 0.001% for TV BAS equipment operating in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band,
which does not have a limit under the current rules. Finally, the Notice proposed to grandfather existing authorized BAS systems in the 2483.5- 2500 MHz band at their current frequency tolerance. 123

67. Commenting parties support the proposals set forth in the Notice. 124 However, MRC notes that it currently manufactures TV BAS equipment with tolerances of 0.005% for fixed analog radios
and 0.002% for portable analog radios, and states that all radios in the field or currently under production for existing product lines should be grandfathered. 125 Red River agrees that grandfathering is necessary,
arguing that, if their existing equipment had to be replaced before its cost was fully amortized, and they would incur a substantial adverse economic impact. 126

68. Discussion. As proposed in the Notice, we are eliminating separate frequency tolerance requirements for base and mobile operations, and are adopting a frequency tolerance of 0.001% for fixed
and mobile TV BAS equipment operating in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band. 127 We find that having consistent frequency tolerance requirements for both fixed and mobile transmitters will simplify
frequency coordination and improve spectrum efficiency. Similarly, by adopting a frequency tolerance requirement, we will ensure that spectrally efficient equipment is used and, for example, in the 2450-
2483.5 MHz band, that the potential for adjacent channel interference is reduced. In that regard, to accommodate existing product lines in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band such as those of MRC, we will delay
the effective date of the 0.001% tolerance in that band for two years. We find that this will accommodate MRC’s existing product line, and strikes a balance between the benefits of spectrum efficiency afforded
by a tighter tolerance and the indefinite accommodation sought by MRC for non- compliant product lines. Thus, we will grandfather existing equipment and equipment of current production lines exceeding the
new 0.001% tolerance in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band and authorized, via certification or verification, 128
121 Frequency tolerance is the maximum permissible deviation of the center frequency of an emission from its
assigned frequency.
122 See Part 101 NPRM, supra, at Appendix D, Section 101.107.

123 Notice at ¶ 41.
124 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 6; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 8; MRC Comments at 6; TIA Reply Comments at 4.
125 MRC Comments at 6.
126 Red River Comments at 1- 2.
127 See Appendix A, infra, at § 74.661.
128 We remind manufacturers that, although their equipment may meet new tolerance or emission mask
requirements, their existing equipment verification may not demonstrate, or their existing equipment certification may not reflect, such compliance. To remedy this situation, manufacturers must, in the case of verification, verify

via retesting, or, in the case of certification, refile certification under the permissive change provisions of Section 2.1043 or file for certification under a new identification number, depending on the modifications needed to meet
the new requirements. 47 C. F. R. §§ 2.1043.
28
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
29
up to two years after the adoption of this Report and Order, and stations authorized to use such equipment pursuant to an application filed up to two years after the adoption of this Report and Order. However, any
such non- conforming equipment replaced on or after two years after the adoption of this Report and Order must be replaced by conforming equipment.

9. Use of the 13.150- 13.2125 GHz Band by BAS and CARS Pickup Stations
69. In ET Docket No. 98- 206, the Commission allocated the band 12.75- 13.25 GHz for Non-Geostationary Fixed Satellite Service (NGSO FSS) uplinks on a co- primary basis. 129 The 13.15- 13.20

GHz portion of that band is currently used by TV BAS and CARS Pickup Stations within 50 km of the top 100 television markets and by fixed TV auxiliary stations in all other areas. 130 To protect these
operations, the NGSO FSS systems were excluded from operating in the 13.15- 13.2125 GHz band (channels A19, A20, B19 and B20). 131 In the NGSO Order, the Commission expanded these exclusions in
favor of TV BAS and CARS to include frequencies up to 13.2125 GHz and to extend to the entire United States. This action was predicated on the expectation that BAS and CARS mobile operations will be
concentrated on those four channels. 132 Based on that action, the Commission proposed to update Section 74.602( a), Note 2 to reflect these changes. Further, the Notice proposed to grandfather all fixed stations
that were licensed in the 13.15- 13.2125 GHz band prior to the effective date of the rules in the NGSO Order. 133

70. Both MSTV/ NAB and SBE support our proposals. 134 SBE notes that, in light of the NGSO Order, it makes sense to extend the reservation and grandfather existing fixed BAS and CARS. 135
71. Discussion. As proposed in the Notice, we are updating Section 74.602( a) Note 2 to implement, in accordance with the NGSO Order, expansions in mobile TV BAS and CARS pickup
stations’ use of the 13.15- 13.2125 GHz band and the exclusion of NGSO FSS from that band. 136 We note that the recent Optel Order has rendered BAS pickup stations primary, and CARS stations, secondary to

129 See Amendment of Parts 2 and 25 of the Commission's Rules to Permit Operation of NGSO FSS Systems Co-Frequency
with GSO and Terrestrial Systems in the Ku- Band Frequency Range, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket No. 98- 206, 16 FCC Rcd 4096 (2001) (NGSO Order), at ¶ 122.

130 47 C. F. R. § 74.602( a) Note 2.
131 Id. We note that Note 2 currently specifies protection for the 13.15- 13.20 GHz band. However, channel B20,
which was provided protection in the NGSO Order, extends to 13.2125 GHz.
132 See NGSO Order at ¶ 126.

133 Notice at ¶ 42.
134 See MSTV/ NAB Comments at 9; SBE Comments at 11.
135 SBE Comments at 11.
136 We note that Skybridge L. L. C. has filed a Petition for Reconsideration of the Commission’s decision in the
NGSO Order to exclude NGSO FSS from the band 13.15- 13.2125 GHz. That Petition is being addressed in ET Docket No. 98- 206.
29
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
30
BAS pickup stations, in the 13.20- 13.25 GHz band, 137 and we are updating Section 74.602( a), Note 2, accordingly, to reflect this status in the 13.20- 13.2125 sub- band. Consistent with these actions, we are
also updating Section 78.18( 1) with respect to CARS, and footnote NG53 to the Table of Frequency Allocations in Section 2.106. Further, we are grandfathering at their current status all fixed stations
licensed in the 13.15- 13.2125 GHz band prior to the effective date of the rules in this Report and Order.
10. Use of the 31.0- 31.3 GHz and 38.6- 40.0 GHz Bands by the BAS and CARS
72. In 1997, the Commission redesignated the 31.0- 31.3 GHz band for the Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) and deleted the designations for BAS and CARS. 138 Consequently, BAS

and CARS are no longer authorized to operate in this band. However, many of the technical rules continue to mention this band. Therefore, the Commission proposed in the Notice to eliminate references
to the 31.0- 31.3 GHz band in the aural BAS, TV BAS and CARS rules. 139
73. Similarly, the Commission, in 1997, adopted rules and procedures to assign the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band by competitive bidding. 140 That band had been available for assignment to mobile

BAS and CARS licenses without bandwidth limitation and on a secondary basis to fixed stations. 141 In addition to the new assignment procedures, the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, pursuant to
delegated authority, adopted an Order (Freeze Order) announcing that the Commission would no longer accept for filing any new applications for 39 GHz licenses in the Common Carrier or Private Operational
Fixed Point- to- Point Radio Services. 142 In addition, consistent with the policy of the Freeze Order and the assignment of new licenses by auction, no new assignments are being made for BAS or CARS
licenses in the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band. 143 Accordingly, the Commission proposed in the Notice to remove all references to the 38.6- 40.0 GHz bands from the BAS and CARS rules. As a final matter, the
Commission noted that there are 15 incumbent Television Pickup BAS stations operating in this band. In

137 See Amendment of Eligibility Requirements in Part 78 Regarding 12 GHz Cable Television Relay Service, CS
Docket No. 99- 250, Report and Order, 17 FCC Rcd 9930 (2002) (FCC 02- 149) (Optel Order), at ¶¶ 21- 24. See also Section 78.18 (m), added by the Optel Order, which states that CARS stations may be authorized use of the

band from 13.20 to 13.25 GHz on a secondary basis to Television Broadcast Auxiliary Stations. 47 C. F. R. § 78.18( m).

138 See Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, and 25 of the Commission’s Rules to Redesignate the 27.5- 29.5 GHz
Frequency Band, To Reallocate the 29.5- 30.0 GHz Frequency Band, To Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and For Fixed Satellite Services, CC Docket No. 92- 297, Second Report and Order,

Order on Reconsideration, and Fifth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 12 FCC Rcd 12545 (1997).
139 Notice at ¶ 43.

140 See Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Regarding The 37.0- 38.6 GHz and 38.6- 40.0 GHz Bands, ET
Docket No. 95- 183, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 18600 (1997). In May 2000, the Commission assigned more than 2,000 licenses in 175 Economic Areas by competitive bidding in

the 39 GHz band. See 39 GHz Band Auction Closes, Report Auc- 30- E (Auction No. 30), DA 00- 1035, rel. May 10, 2000.

141 47 C. F. R. § 74.602.
142 See Petition For Amendment Of The Commission's Rules Regarding The 37. 0- 38. 6 GHz And 38. 6- 40 GHz
Bands, DA 95- 2341, Order, 11 FCC Rcd 1156 (1996) (Freeze Order).
143 No new BAS licenses have been issued in the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band since the adoption of the Freeze Order.
30
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
31
the Notice, the Commission stated that these BAS licensees may continue to operate under the parameters of their current licenses and renew those licenses in the future. 144
74. Commenting parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice. 145 SBE states that it agrees with the proposed elimination of references to the 31.0- 31.3 GHz and 38.6- 40.0 GHz bands
from BAS and CARS technical rules, since those bands are no longer available to BAS, and concurs with the grandfathering of incumbents in the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band. SBE also requests that the Commission
provide guidance on how to identify, contact, and coordinate with the primary occupants of the band. 146
75. Winstar states that it strongly supports the proposed elimination of references to the 31.0- 31.3 GHz band from all BAS and CARS technical rules, as that band is currently designated for primary

use by LMDS and there are no currently active BAS or CARS authorizations in the band. 147 Winstar states that it also supports the proposed elimination of references to the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band from BAS
and CARS frequency assignment rules, but suggests that the references to that band in certain BAS technical rules be maintained because those rules set technical limitations on incumbent operations in the
band. Winstar also expresses concern with the Notice’s proposal to allow incumbent BAS licensees in the 38.6- 40 GHz band to continue operating. It notes that, according to the ULS, the locations of the 16
active BAS licenses are in nine of the largest major metropolitan areas in the country. 148 Winstar strongly urges the Commission to clarify that all BAS operations in the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band, which are secondary,
must coordinate with primary fixed wireless licensees prior to each operation, with no exceptions for unanticipated need for immediate operation. Alternatively, Winstar recommends that the Commission
eliminate secondary BAS licenses from the band, in order to avoid adversely impacting Winstar’s service availability. Finally, Winstar urges the Commission to publicize the fact that information on all fixed
wireless licenses in the band is available on the ULS to all incumbent BAS operators. 149
76. Discussion. We are adopting the proposals in the Notice to eliminate references to the 31.0- 31.3 GHz and 38.6- 40.0 GHz bands from BAS and CARS technical rules, and to grandfather BAS

incumbents in the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band. No party opposes the first proposal, and only Winstar expresses concern regarding the second proposal. With respect to Winstar’s concern, we note that the incumbent
BAS licensees remain bound by the operational parameters specified on their current authorizations. We also clarify that, as stated in footnote US291 to the Table of Frequency Allocations, mobile BAS facilities

144 Notice at ¶ 44. Since the adoption of the Notice, one station, call sign KC23139, cancelled its license.
145 See SBE Comments at 11; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 9; Winstar Comments at 2.
146 SBE Comments at 11.
147 Winstar Comments at 2.
148 Id. at 3. With respect to Winstar’s concern, in its Comments at 3- 4, that certain BAS licenses listed as active are
also listed as expired on the ULS, we clarify that, as noted by SBE in its Reply Comments at 8, the expiration dates on BAS licenses may not be updated from the broadcast station renewal, so that validity of a license must be

determined by whether it is active on the ULS. Modifications to enable the ULS to update expiration dates from broadcast station renewals are planned. Meanwhile, active status may be determined through the ULS using the
frequency search function, or, if the call sign is known, observing its active status on the license record. Questions about specific licenses should be directed to the Licensing Branch of the Public Safety and Private Wireless
Division of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
149 Id. at 4- 5.
31
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
32
in the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band operate on a secondary basis with respect to stations operating in accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocations, which include Winstar’s operations under Part 101. In this
connection, consistent with our actions removing references to the 38.6- 40.0 GHz band from Part 74, we are deleting Auxiliary Broadcasting from that band in the Table of Frequency Allocations. We are also
deleting footnote US291 from the Federal Government and Non- Federal Government columns of the table and replacing it with footnote NG175 in the Non- Federal Government column only, revised to show
that the band is no longer available for BAS, and that incumbent mobile BAS operations licensed as of the effective date of the rules in this Report and Order are grandfathered and may continue to operate
indefinitely on a secondary basis with respect to Part 101 licensees. We are revising Section 2.106, Table of Frequency Allocations, and Part 74 of our rules, accordingly. 150

11. Antennas
77. In addition to the specific proposals made in the Notice, we asked commenters to identify other rule changes that would benefit the BAS. In this regard, MRC requests that periscope antenna

systems 151 be prohibited from BAS, as they are in other services, 152 because periscope antenna sidelobe rejection is poor and unpredictable, and can cause interference to both satellite and terrestrial systems. 153

78. Discussion. The existing provisions that accommodate new periscope antennas in Section 74.641 and 78.105 do so only on the condition that applicants make a persuasive showing that no
frequency conflicts exist in the area of intended operation. 154 This constraint ensures that new periscope antennas will not cause unacceptable interference to terrestrial or satellite users. We therefore decline to
limit flexibility in BAS antenna selection at this time.
B. BAS Service Rules (Part 74)
1. Temporary Conditional Authority
79. In the Notice, the Commission proposed to allow BAS applicants who apply for new or modified stations to operate under temporary conditional authority after an application has been properly

filed with the Commission. 155 This type of operating authority is permitted in other coordinated services, such as those authorized under Parts 90 and 101 and Remote Pickup BAS. 156 The Commission proposed
to make such temporary conditional authority subject to the following conditions:

150 See Appendix A, infra, at § 2.106, footnote NG175; Part 74.
151 A periscope antenna configuration uses a transmitting antenna oriented to produce a vertical radiation pattern,
with a flat or off- axis parabolic reflector, mounted above the transmitting antenna, which directs the beam in a horizontal path toward the receiving antenna. This type of antenna facilitates increased terrain clearance without

long transmission lines, while permitting the active equipment to be located at or near ground level for ease of maintenance.

152 See, e. g., 47 C. F. R. § 101.115( d).
153 MRC Comments at 8.
154 See 47 C. F. R. § 74.641( c).
155 Notice at ¶ 46.
156 47 C. F. R. §§ 90.159( b), 101.31, and 74.431( g).
32
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
33
€ The applicant must be eligible to operate the particular class of broadcast auxiliary station. € The station must be operating in conformance with the rules for that particular class of station and in
accordance with the terms of the frequency coordination. € The application does not propose operation in an area that requires international coordination.
€ The application does not request a waiver of the Commission’s rules. € The proposed station will not significantly affect the environment as defined in Part 1, Subpart I of
the Commission’s rules. 157 € The antenna structure either has a FCC Registration Number or is determined to not need one.
€ The proposed station affords protection to radio “quiet” zones and monitoring stations. 158
The Commission also proposed to allow temporary conditional authority for low power auxiliary stations authorized under Part 74, Subpart H. 159 To effectuate these changes, the Commission proposed to delete

Section 74.431( g) and to adopt new Section 74.25 to allow temporary conditional authorizations for all broadcast auxiliary services. 160

80. Commenting parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice. 161 MSTV/ NAB support allowing temporary conditional authority for BAS stations, provided that the BAS
facility has been appropriately coordinated. 162 Comsearch states that temporary conditional authority has been extremely useful to Part 101 users in allowing rapid deployment and should be available to BAS and
CARS users. 163 SBE concurs with the proposal, provided that there is evidence of local frequency coordination and the conditions proposed in the Notice are met. 164 However, Comsearch opposes
temporary conditional authority based on local frequency coordination, which it contends is a unilateral frequency coordination process. Comsearch argues that the licensees and applicants who are affected by
a temporary conditional authority proposal must be given an opportunity to review and, if necessary, oppose that proposal prior to operation of the proposed facilities. 165

81. Discussion. We find that providing BAS applicants with the ability to operate under temporary conditional authority is appropriate. As suggested by the commenting parties, such an
approach will permit the provision of service in a timelier manner without causing harmful interference
157 47 C. F. R. § Part 1, Subpart I.
158 Notice at ¶ 47.
159 Id. at ¶ 48. Low power auxiliary stations are intended to transmit over distances of approximately 100 meters for
uses such as wireless microphones, cue and control communications, and synchronization of TV camera signals. These stations are typically used in conjunction with a BAS station.

160 Id. at ¶¶ 48- 49.
161 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 6; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 8; Comsearch Comments at 5; TIA Reply Comments
at 3.
162 MSTV/ NAB Comments at 9.

163 Comsearch Comments at 4.
164 SBE points out that the word “not” was omitted from proposed Section 74.25( c)( ii), which reads, “The station
site does lie within an area requiring international coordination.” See SBE Comments at 12.
165 Comsearch Reply Comments at 3.
33
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
34
to existing licensees, so long as frequency coordination is successfully performed. Accordingly, we are deleting Section 74.431( g) and adopting a new Section 74.25 to allow temporary conditional
authorizations for all broadcast auxiliary services. 166
2. Short- Term Operation
82. Section 74.24 provides broadcast licensees regulated under Part 73 of our rules (i. e., AM, FM, and TV broadcast stations, including Class A stations) with the authority to operate a broadcast

auxiliary station on a short- term secondary basis, for up to 720 hours per year, without prior authorization from the Commission, subject to providing notification to the local frequency coordinator, and to co-channel
and adjacent channel CARS licensees. 167 This rule section provides broadcasters with flexibility to respond to short term situations that occur outside of a station’s normal operating area without coming
to the Commission with requests for STA. However, the same flexibility is not afforded to broadcast network entities, cable network entities, or LPTV stations, even though these entities are eligible to hold
BAS licenses. Thus, the current rules allow one class of BAS licensees - broadcasters - to operate under the short- term operation rule, but exclude all other BAS licensees even though each of these entities may
operate their own news services and originate programming. Because we believe that broadcast and cable network entities and LPTV stations would benefit from the short- term operation rule and such use would
provide equity under our rules for all entities eligible for a BAS license, the Commission proposed in the Notice to expand the eligibility of this rule. 168 The Commission also proposed to clarify that entities may
not invoke the notification exception for scheduled events. 169 The Commission further proposed to codify the procedures for designating a coordinator as the single point of contact for advance coordination of
auxiliary broadcast frequency usage of major national and international level scheduled news events. In the Notice the Commission pointed out that it has accomplished this in the past by issuing a Public
Notice, but that such procedures should be contained in the rules. 170 The Commission also sought comment on whether the current Rule which limits short- term operation for a licensee to 720 hours per
year per frequency should be modified, and whether stations should be required to keep a log of their short term use in their station records. 171

83. Commenting parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice. 172 APTS/ PBS state that they support the proposals to extend short- term operation to broadcast network entities, cable
entities, and low power television stations; to relax the notification requirement only in cases of unanticipated need for immediate short- term mobile operation, specifically excluding scheduled events;

166 We also correct the error in Section 74.25( c)( ii) pointed out by SBE and modify that provision to read, “The
station site does not lie within an area requiring international coordination.”
167 47 C. F. R. § 74.24. There is an exception to the local coordinator notification requirement when “ … an
unanticipated need for immediate short- term mobile station operation would render compliance with the provisions of this paragraph impractical.” See 47 C. F. R. § 74.24( g).

168 Notice at ¶ 51.
169 Id. at ¶ 52.
170 Id. at ¶ 53.
171 Id. at ¶ 54.
172 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 7; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 9; Globalstar Comments at 7; SBE Comments at 12.
34
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
35
and to establish a procedure for designating a frequency coordinator for short- term BAS operations covering major national and international scheduled news events. 173 MSTV/ NAB state that they generally
support the proposal to extend short- term operation to broadcast networks, cable, networks, and LPTV stations, but contend that it is vitally important to require that all such operations be prior coordinated.
MSTV/ NAB also contend that there is no clear definition of a scheduled event, for which the licensee would be excluded from invoking the notification exception in proposed Section 74.24( g). MSTV/ NAB
further support the proposed procedures to designate a frequency coordinator for short- term operations at special events, if such designation is granted following a formal request. Finally, MSTV/ NAB oppose
changing the current 720 hour limit on short- term operation or requiring stations to log and track their short- term use. 174

84. SBE also concurs with the proposal to extend short- term operation to broadcast network entities, cable network entities. However, SBE recommends that because these entities do not have call
signs, they identify themselves using the network or cable base entity name and city of operation. 175 SBE would disallow short- term operation for links operated intermittently on permanently installed antennas,
as it believes such operation should be frequency coordinated and licensed. SBE also recommends that the existing requirement to always provide advance notice to co- channel and adjacent channel CARS
licensees is unnecessary and redundant, given the current frequency coordination tools and the experience and knowledge of local coordinators. 176 In addition, SBE asserts that the 720 hour limit has proven to be
unenforceable and should be changed to a 30 calendar day period per year per market. It contends that this would be simpler to follow and enforce because broadcasters would not have to count hours or
skipped days and a FCC field engineer would only need to determine the date of first operation to ascertain compliance. As an exception, SBE would allow itinerant operators to halt and restart the 30- day
clock each time it leaves and returns to a market.
85. Globalstar states that it does not object to extending short term operation to broadcast network entities, cable network entities and LPTV stations, but asserts that because such use has been

increasing, it is essential that coordination be conducted prior to commencing operation, particularly for mobile operations in spectrum shared with satellite services. Globalstar urges that in addition to
notification, coordination should be accomplished with the frequency coordinating committee or co-channel licensee prior to commencement of operations to avert interference to an NGSO MSS feeder
downlink. For the same reasons, Globalstar urges that the proposed exception to notification in cases of unanticipated need not be allowed for spectrum shared with NGSO MSS spectrum in the 2 GHz and 7
GHz bands. Finally, Globalstar recommends that the Commission list in its rules a telephone number and website address for contacting local coordinating committees and special event coordinators, similar to
the outdated reference in current Section 74.24( g) that refers applicants to the Commission’s Auxiliary Services Branch for information on active frequency coordination committees. 177

173 APTS/ PBS Comments at 7.
174 MSTV/ NAB Comments at 9- 10.
175 SBE Comments at 12.
176 SBE Comments at 13.
177 Globalstar Comments at 7- 9. The Auxiliary Services Branch no longer exists and the Commission no longer
maintains information on active frequency coordination committees. Thus, reference to it has been omitted from the proposed revision of Section 74.24( g).
35
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
36
86. In reply comments, SBE notes that all short term authority operation is secondary. Therefore it is not necessary to prohibit uncoordinated short- term use under the notification exception in
the 2 GHz and 7 GHz bands, as requested by Globalstar. 178
87. Discussion. To promote consistent treatment of licensees with similar operations, we adopt our proposal to extend the short- term operation rules to broadcast network entities, cable network

entities, and LPTV stations. This action, which is not opposed by any commenter, will simplify the process for these entities when it is necessary to provide coverage of events outside of its normal
coverage area. In addition, our proposal to codify rules and procedures for designating a coordinator for major special events was supported by commenters and is adopted as proposed with one clarification; we
will specify in Section 74.24( g)( 2)( i) that the initial request for such designation be made in writing. Such designations will be made by public notice which will include all necessary contact information. Thus
Globalstar’s request that contact information be placed in the rules is denied. 179
88. Extending this rule to cover additional entities raises questions regarding compliance with the various station identification rules. Therefore, because broadcast network and cable network

entities do not have individual station call signs for identification purpose, we will require them to use their network or cable entity name along with their base of operations city for compliance with the station
identification rules, as suggested by SBE. Using such a scheme will make it easy to identify the proper point of contact should a problem arise.

89. With respect to SBE’s concern regarding intermittent operation on permanently installed antennas, we note that the rule does not prohibit such operation, and thus it is permitted, under Section
74.24, without formal coordination and licensing.
90. With respect to adding a requirement that full frequency coordination be accomplished prior to operation under the short- term operation rule, we disagree with Globalstar that such a requirement

is necessary. First, we note that all operation under this rule is secondary. Second, we believe that the current requirement to notify the local coordinating committee or co- channel licensees, and co- channel
and adjacent channel CARS licensees is sufficient. These conditions assure that operations under the short- term operation rule have a minimal chance of causing harmful interference while providing
broadcasters the ability to cover a newsworthy event without delay.
91. As detailed above, SBE requests that the requirement that co- channel and adjacent channel CARS be notified when a broadcaster operates under the short- term operation rule be deleted. We

are not inclined to do so. We disagree with SBE’s position that this requirement is unnecessary and redundant. CARS stations generally transmit large blocks of contiguous video channels with no filtering.
The notification requirement is necessary to ensure that CARS licensees, particularly those operating on adjacent channels without receiver filtering, are afforded an opportunity to have prior knowledge of the
RF operating environment. This is especially important in areas where local coordinators are not available or provide limited assistance.

92. Finally, we will maintain the current limitation of 720 hours per year per frequency for short- term operation. We agree with the MSTV/ NAB that the existing limit has worked well and that

178 SBE Reply Comments at 5.
179 We note that the current information on local frequency coordinators is maintained by SBE on their website at
http:// www. sbe. org,
36
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
37
there does not appear to be a demonstrable need to make changes at this time. We do not believe that changing this limit to a 30 calendar day limit, as suggested by SBE, would significantly increase the
enforceability of the rule, absent the imposition of a logging requirement. This is especially true for the stop/ start provisions which SBE also proposes to permit, as an exception to the 30 consecutive day limit,
for network entities with no regular presence in the market.
3. Use of UHF- TV Channels for TV STLs and TV Relay Stations
93. Under Section 74.602( h) of the Commission’s rules, TV STLs and TV relay stations may be authorized, on a secondary basis, to operate fixed point- to- point service on spectrum allocated for

UHF- TV stations. 180 In addition to being secondary to full power UHF- TV and Class A TV stations, these stations are also secondary to LPTV stations and translator stations, and to land mobile stations
authorized under Parts 22 and 90 in areas where land mobile sharing is permitted. 181 The rules, however, do not contain any guidelines regarding acceptable power limits or antenna specifications for these
stations. 182 Instead, the Commission has developed policies to determine how to authorize these stations. Specifically, TV STL and TV relay station applicants that request output power greater than 20 watts or a
transmitting antenna with a 3 dB beamwidth greater than 25 degrees are asked to submit an engineering analysis to demonstrate why the higher output power or wider beamwidth is necessary. 183 Because the
Commission is increasingly relying on automated processing, as evidenced by the ULS, it stated in the Notice that codifying operational parameters for these stations would be beneficial so that prospective
applicants have as much information as possible to assist them. The Commission further stated that this change would shorten the application process by minimizing the number of applications that need to be
returned due to failure to submit an engineering analysis if the stated specifications are exceeded. 184
94. To implement this policy in the rules, the Commission proposed to modify Section 74.602( h) to permit applicants for TV STL and TV relay stations up to 35 dBW EIRP, a 3 dB beamwidth

of 25 degrees or less, and use of vertical polarization 185 without submitting an engineering analysis. 186 In
180 47 C. F. R. § 74.602( h). The UHF- TV spectrum may be used only if a licensee cannot find spectrum available in
any other frequency band allocated for these stations.
181 47 C. F. R. Parts 22 and 90 provide for the use of land mobile stations in the 470- 512 MHz band (TV channels
14- 21). See, e. g., 47 C. F. R. §§ 22.621 and 90.303. Additionally, we note that the Commission adopted an Order in 1995 granting a conditional waiver for public safety land mobile use of Channel 16 in New York City. See In the

Matter of Waiver of Parts 2 and 90 of the Commission's Rules to Permit New York Metropolitan Area Public Safety Agencies to Use Frequencies at 482- 488 MHz on a Conditional Basis, Order, 10 FCC Rcd 4466 (1995). Under
terms adopted in the Report and Order in MM Docket No. 00- 10, the New York Police, operating under authority of the cited waiver, and LPTV station WEBR- LP will continue their current practice of cooperating to ensure that
neither party interferes with the other’s transmission on Channel 16. See In The Matter Of Establishment Of A Class A Television Service, MM Docket No. 00- 10, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 6355 (2000) at ¶ 84.

182 See 47 C. F. R. § 74.636 (power limits), 47 C. F. R. § 74.641 (antenna requirements).
183 This policy was articulated for applicants in RM- 7586. See TV Auxiliary Use of Vacant UHF- TV Channels,
RM- 7586, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 10 FCC Rcd 4896 (1995) (UHF- TV Order) at ¶¶ 9- 11.
184 Notice at ¶ 55.

185 Vertical polarization, rather than the more commonly transmitted horizontal polarization is required as an added
safeguard to prevent reception of these signals by the public.
186 Id. at ¶ 57.
37
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
38
addition, because the Commission also regularly licenses TV translator relay stations on UHF- TV channels, it proposed that they also be subject to these rules. 187 Finally, the Commission proposed to limit
future assignments on UHF- TV stations to channels 14- 51 and to grandfather existing operations on channels 52- 69. This proposal was made based on the Commission’s recent reallocation of channels 52-
59 (698- 746 MHz) 188 and channels 60- 69 (746- 806 MHz) from broadcasting to fixed, mobile, and broadcasting with most licenses to be assigned by competitive bidding. 189

95. Commenting parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice. 190 In supporting the proposal MSTV/ NAB additionally ask the Commission to require that such links be
encoded to prevent reception by consumers. They contend that the vertical polarization restriction is insufficient in this regard. 191 SBE, while supportive of placing the current policy requirements in the
rules, objects to allowing these links to be established without an engineering analysis. It points out that the current rules which require point- to- point links to meet the same technical requirements of new TV
translator or LPTV stations, protects existing broadcast stations, especially if the new station is intended to be located at a high elevation. In addition, SBE recommends providing an incentive to use vertical
polarization, but not requiring its use. SBE would accomplish this by applying a 10 dB polarization factor to stations using vertical polarization during their analysis. SBE is supportive of restricting future
links to channels 14- 51 and our proposal to grandfather existing stations operating on channels 52- 69. 192
96. The National Translator Association (NTA) opposes our proposal to cease licensing translator relay stations on UHF- TV channels 52- 69. It asks that authorizations for new translator relay

stations be permitted on these channels on a secondary, non- interference basis until such time as the Commission’s Media Bureau stops accepting applications for new translator stations on these channels. It
states that translator relay stations are an economical method of transporting a station’s signals to TV translator station and that most translator relays are in relatively remote areas where new spectrum users
will be slow to use the spectrum. It also notes that during the transition to DTV, stations will be using both analog and digital channels, making it difficult to find available channels for new translator relay

187 Id. at ¶ 58.
188 See In the Matter of Reallocation and Service Rules for the 698- 746 MHz Spectrum Band (Television Channels
52- 59), Report and Order, GN Docket No. 01- 74, 17 FCC Rcd 1022 (2002) (Channel 52- 59 Reallocation Order), at ¶¶ 2, 13.

189 See generally In the Matter of Reallocation of Television Channels 60- 69, The 746- 806 MHz Band, ET Docket
No. 97- 157, Report and Order, 12 FCC Rcd. 22953 (1998). In that proceeding the 764- 776 MHz and 794- 806 MHz bands were designated for use by public safety. The 746- 747 MHz, 762- 764 MHz, 776- 777 MHz, and 792-

794 MHz bands have already been auctioned and assigned to guard band managers. That auction was completed on February 21, 2001. See 700 MHz Guard Bands Auction Closes, DA 01- 478, Public Notice, Feb. 22, 2001. The
auction for the 698- 746 MHz band began June 19, 2002 and the auction for the 747- 762 MHz and 777- 792 MHz bands is scheduled to begin January 14, 2003. See In the matter of Auction of Licenses in the 747- 762 and 777- 792
MHz Bands (Auction No. 31); Auction of Licenses in the 698- 746 MHz Band (Auction No. 44); Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association, Paxson Communications Corporation and the Spectrum Clearing
Alliance Applications for Review of Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Letter, April 10, 2002, DA 02- 857, WT Docket No. 99- 168, GN Docket No. 01- 74, Order, rel. May 24, 2002.

190 See APTS/ PBS Comments at 7- 8; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 11.
191 MST/ NAB Comments at 11.
192 SBE Comments at 14- 15.
38
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
39
operations. 193
97. Discussion. Based on the comments, we adopt, with some modification, our proposals with respect to the future use of UHF- TV channels by TV STLs, TV relay stations, and TV translator

relay stations. We will permit these stations to obtain authorizations without submitting an engineering analysis so long as they meet the specified technical parameters – maximum EIRP of 35 dBW, maximum
transmitting antenna beamwidth of 25 degrees, and use of vertical polarization. In addition, we will limit future licensing, beginning as of the effective date of the rules of this Report and Order, of TV STLs and
TV relay stations to channels 14- 51; current stations on channels 52- 69 will be grandfathered under the terms of their current authorization until the end of the DTV transition or until new primary licensees
require the removal of such operations. Finally, for the reasons given by NTA, we will permit future licensing of TV translator relay stations on all UHF- TV channels 52- 69 through the end of the DTV
transition as long as harmful interference is not caused to new primary services.
98. We disagree with MSTV/ NAB and SBE that additional measures must be taken to protect UHF- TV broadcast operations from TV STLs, TV relay stations, and TV translator relay stations. The

Commission articulated in the UHF- TV Order that, given the power and antenna restrictions and absent any evidence of TV BAS stations being used to provide direct service to the public, a coding requirement
would present an unwarranted additional cost burden on these stations. 194 We believe this still to be the case and decline to add this additional requirement as a condition of licensing. In the UHF- TV Order, the
Commission eliminated certain engineering showings and streamlined the licensing process. In doing so, we are unaware of any stations that have encountered interference due to these policies. Therefore, we
decline to adopt any additional restrictions or review procedures which would unnecessarily burden licensees or the licensing process. We will however make a slight wording change to Section
74.602( h)( 1) to clarify that if any of the specified parameters are exceeded, an engineering analysis must accompany the application. 195 We also point out that stations licensed under 74.602( h) are secondary and
regardless of their operating parameters, must protect all primary stations using the UHF- TV spectrum, including land mobile stations. 196

193 NTA Ex Parte presentation of March 21, 2002, ET Docket No. 01- 75, filed May 10, 2002, at 1- 2. NTA also
asks that we allow the transmission of multiple contiguous standard 8- Level Vestigial Side- Band (8VSB) digital modulation signals from multiple primary stations, as defined in Section 74.701( b), on one set of microwave

equipment operating on a channel for which a TV translator relay station is already authorized. We clarify here that Section 74.631( d) already allows such a station to multiplex signals to provide additional communication channels
in the manner requested by the NTA. 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.701( b), 74.631( d). In addition, we note that because NTA states that the proposed operation would adhere to the current emission mask, allowing multiple signals within a
channel will not increase the interference potential of transmissions within the channel.
194 See UHF- TV Order at ¶¶ 12- 13.

195 We are modifying the language of proposed Section 74.602( h)( 1) to, “Applications for authorization in
accordance with this paragraph must comply with the following technical limits or be accompanied by an engineering analysis demonstrating why these limits must be exceeded.”

196 Stations licensed under 47 C. F. R. § 74.602( h) are subject to provisions of Part 74, Subpart G, which contains
protection criteria for many types of stations. See, for example, Sections 74.705, 74.707, and 74.709 for interference protection criteria for TV broadcast stations; low power TV and TV translator stations; and land mobile

stations, respectively. 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.705, 74.707, and 74.709.
39
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
40
99. Commenters, recognizing that the frequency bands encompassing UHF- TV channels 52- 69 have been reallocated, generally support our proposal to cease licensing BAS stations on this
spectrum. Accordingly, for applications filed on or after the effective date of these rules, we will no longer accept applications for TV STLs or TV relay stations for operations on TV channels 52- 69.
Existing stations will be grandfathered on a continued secondary basis under the terms of their current authorizations until the end of the DTV transition or until the band is needed for new primary status
licensed services. 197 This action will minimize encumbrance of the spectrum and ease the introduction of new services. We take a slightly different approach, however, to future licensing of TV translator relay
stations. We will allow new authorizations for these stations to operate on UHF- TV channels 52- 69 until the end of the DTV transition as long as there are no interference conflicts with new licensed services. We
find that this action should not affect new uses of this spectrum as TV translator relay stations operate on a secondary basis to new primary services on UHF- TV channels 52- 69 and TV translator relay stations
are typically in remote areas. In addition, this is consistent with the Commission’s decision in the Channel 52- 59 Reallocation Order, which allows the continued filing and operation of new low power
TV and TV translator stations, on a secondary basis, on Channels 52- 69 through the end of the DTV transition. 198 We observe that TV translator relay stations are typically used to carry TV signals to
translator stations 199 to serve communities that are far from TV broadcast stations. Such transmission is often more economically accommodated at UHF- TV frequencies than in the higher microwave frequency
bands available to TV BAS. Given the value of TV translator relay stations to rural areas that may not see new primary services for years to come, and the fact that new TV translators may be authorized only
on a secondary basis on UHF- TV Channels 52- 69 through the end of the DTV transition, we find that the continued authorization and operation of TV translator relay stations is desirable and will not impact new
primary services. Consistent with the Channel 52- 59 Reallocation Order, we also will permit translator relay stations in operation on channels 52- 59 at the end of the DTV transition to continue operating on a
secondary basis to new services after the end of the transition. 200
100. Finally, we remind all TV BAS licensees and prospective applicants for operation on UHF- TV channels 52- 69 (698- 806 MHz) that operations by new primary services in that band will be

permitted anywhere within the licensed geographic areas as soon as they are licensed, and need not wait till the end of DTV transition, on December 31, 2006, or later, 201 provided they do not interfere with full-power
TV. For example, a new primary service licensee may be able to deploy in areas without TV service or make arrangement for spectrum access prior to the completion of DTV transition. TV BAS
operations, because of their secondary status both during and after DTV transition, are not permitted to cause harmful interference to stations of primary services - including new licensees in the band as a result

197 47 U. S. C. § 309( j)( 14)( A)-( B). This statute requires analog TV broadcasters to cease operation in the recovered
spectrum by the end of 2006 unless the Commission extends the end of the transition, which it is required to do at the request of individual broadcast licensees on a market- by- market basis, if: (1) one or more of the four largest

network stations or affiliates is not broadcasting in digital format; (2) digital- to- analog converter technology is not generally available; or, (3) 15 percent or more of television households are not receiving a digital signal. See also
Channel 52- 59 Reallocation Order at ¶ 3.
198 Channel 52- 59 Reallocation Order at ¶¶ 46- 49. See also footnote NG159 to the Table of Frequency Allocations
in Section 2.106, 47 C. F. R. § 2.106.
199 See 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.631( g) and 74.632( e).

200 Channel 52- 59 Reallocation Order at ¶ 48.
201 47 U. S. C. § 309( j)( 14)( A)-( B).
40
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
41
of the upcoming auctions. This means that if TV BAS operations cause harmful interference to these primary services, they must cease operation immediately, regardless of whether this occurs before or after
the end of DTV transition. Secondary TV BAS operations are also required to accept any interference caused by these primary services.

4. TV BAS Sound Channels
101. Section 74.603( b) of the Commission’s rules provides authority for TV BAS stations to use an aural broadcast STL or relay station licensed under the aural BAS rules to transmit the aural

portion of a television broadcast program. This use is on a secondary, non- interference basis to programming of aural broadcast stations. 202 In the Notice, the Commission stated that its understanding of
current industry practice is for broadcasters to use multiplexing techniques, rather than separate sound channels, to transmit the aural portion and video portion of their programming over a single TV BAS
channel. Therefore, the Commission proposed to eliminate Section 74.603( b). Additionally, the Commission proposed to eliminate the corresponding provision of Section 74.502( b) that provides TV
BAS licensees’ authorization to use the aural BAS channels. The Commission also sought comment on whether it should delete Section 74.603( c), which provides grandfathering rights so that TV BAS stations
could continue operating aural STL or relay stations that were in service prior to July 10, 1970. 203
102. Discussion. SBE, the only commenter on this issue, confirms our understanding of current industry practice and concurs with our proposals. 204 Accordingly, we adopt our proposals to

eliminate Sections 74.603( b), 74.502( b), 74.603( c).
5. Remote Pickup Broadcast Auxiliary Frequency Assignment
103. In 1984, the Commission adopted a comprehensive revision of the rules for Remote Pickup station frequency assignments. 205 That Report and Order split the Remote Pickup channels in the

150 MHz, 160 MHz and 450 MHz bands into 5 kilohertz channels that could be “stacked” to create channels of various sizes. Thus, licensees could continue operating their equipment under existing
licenses and existing and new licensees seeking to update their systems could make use of newer narrowband technology. The Report and Order, however, stated that an effective date for these rules
would be specified in a future Order. To date, the Commission has not taken such action.
104. The rules written in 1984 for the Remote Pickup Broadcast Service were intended to provide licensees more freedom to choose and implement new technologies in their effort to make the

most efficient use of the spectrum. Because many technical and regulatory changes have occurred since 1984, the Commission proposed in the Notice to amend the rules adopted in 1984, as discussed below, to
ensure that this objective will be achieved. 206

202 47 C. F. R. § 74.603( b).
203 Notice at ¶¶ 60- 61.
204 SBE Comments at 15.
205 See Amendment of Frequency Assignment Procedures in the Broadcast Remote Pickup Service to Facilitate
More Efficient Use of the Available Spectrum, MM Docket No. 84- 280, Report and Order, 49 FR 45155 (Nov. 15, 1984). See also Section 74.402. 47 C. F. R. § 74.402.

206 Notice at ¶ 63.
41
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
42
105. Since 1984, significant advances have been achieved in the development of narrowband radios, such as the maturation of digital modulation techniques, improved coding processes, and
development of more stable oscillators. In 1995, based on advances such as these, the Commission adopted a narrowband channel plan for the 150– 174 MHz and 450- 512 MHz bands used by Part 90
Private Land Mobile Radio Service (PLMRS) licensees. 207 In that decision, the Commission adopted a channel plan in which channels were spaced every 7.5 kilohertz in the 150 MHz band and every
6.25 kilohertz in the 450 MHz band. Under certain circumstances, these channels could be stacked to allow the use of 6.25, 12.5 or 25 kilohertz equipment.

106. The Commission stated in the Notice that it believed that this same band plan is suitable for Remote Pickup BAS operations. Moreover, because many of the 150 MHz and 160 MHz Remote
Pickup channels are shared with the Part 90 Industrial/ Business Pool, the Commission stated that both services might benefit from a common channel plan, with the benefits including more predictable adjacent
channel performance, easier coordination procedures, and economies of scale for equipment. The Commission noted, however, that under the 1984 rules, these benefits would not be realized if Remote
Pickup licensees modify their operating frequencies to correspond to channel centers based on 5 kilohertz spacing. A shift to 5 kilohertz spacing for BAS would create an operating environment in which Part 74
and Part 90 licensees are operating co- channel, offset by 2.5 kilohertz or offset by 5 kilohertz. 208 In many cases there would be significant overlap of RF energy between adjacent channels which could degrade the
performance of user’s systems as other nearby users attempt to transmit on closely spaced adjacent channels. In addition to the increase in potential interference, these conflicting channel plans would
complicate the frequency coordination process because coordinators would need to account for many closely spaced adjacent channels. Consequently, the Commission proposed to amend the frequency
assignment rules for the 150 MHz and 160 MHz bands in Section 74.402 to be consistent with the channel plan in effect in Part 90 (i. e., 7.5 kilohertz channel spacing). Additionally, the Commission
proposed to allow licensees to stack up to 4 channels to operate on channels as wide as 30 kilohertz. The Commission stated that implementing this channel plan could suit both Remote Pickup BAS operators
and PLMRS providers, and would benefit users by allowing for common equipment to be used for both Part 74 and Part 90 licensees. 209

107. In the Notice, the Commission also stated that the vast majority of licensees in the 150 MHz and 160 MHz bands can be accommodated by the proposed channel plan without having to change
their equipment. The proposed channel plan includes all of the channels used by the majority of licensees under the pre- 1984 plan. Compliance with the 1984 channel plan, on the other hand, because it is based
on 5 kHz channel spacing would require licensees to modify their operating frequency, either by retuning or replacing their equipment. The Commission stated that a search of its licensing database reveals that

207 See Replacement of Part 90 by Part 88 to Revise the Private Land Mobile Radio Services and Modify the
Policies Governing Them and Examination of Exclusivity and Frequency assignment Policies of the Private Land Mobile Radio Services, PR Docket No. 92- 235, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 10

FCC Rcd 10076 (1995) (Refarming R& O).
208 For example, under the rules adopted in 1984 for the Remote Pickup Broadcast Service, valid frequencies for use
include 152.8625 and 152.8675 MHz. See 47 C. F. R. § 74.402. Valid Industrial/ Business Pool frequencies under Part 90 include 152.8625 and 152.870 MHz. See 47 C. F. R. § 90.35. From these frequencies, it is clear that valid

frequency separations include 0, 2.5, and 5 kilohertz (e. g., 152.8675 MHz – 152.8625 MHz = 5 kilohertz and 152.870 MHz – 152.8675 MHz = 2.5 kilohertz.)

209 Notice at ¶ 66.
42
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
43
most licensees continue to operate on the Remote Pickup channels under the pre- 1984 channel plan, and that there are only 7 Remote Pickup licensees in the 150 MHz band and 25 in the 160 MHz band that
have begun operating using the 1984 channel plan. 210
108. In the Notice, the Commission also proposed to modify the 1984 channel plan for the 50 kilohertz wide Group N1 and 25 kilohertz wide N2 450 MHz Remote Pickup channels. Specifically, the

Commission proposed to standardize the Remote Pickup channel plan with the Part 90 channel plan by listing channels 6.25 kilohertz apart and allowing licensees to stack up to 8 channels (50 kilohertz). The
Commission stated that, although Part 74 licensees do not share this band with Part 90 licensees, by aligning to the Part 90 channel plan BAS licensees in this band will reap the same benefits as those
expected for the VHF band. The Commission also observed that, similar to the VHF band, its database shows that most licensees continue to operate on the pre- 1984 channel plan, although some licensees have
begun migrating to the 1984 channel plan. 211
109. To accommodate all licensees who are operating in compliance with the 1984 channel plan, the Commission proposed in the Notice to give them three years from the date a new channel plan is

adopted to modify their equipment and comply with the new plan. The Commission stated that this would provide licensees adequate time to either retune or replace equipment. However, because the
number of licensees affected by our proposals is small, the Commission proposed to provide them the option to continue operating using the 1984 channel plan after the three year transition period ends, but
only on a secondary, non- interference basis. The Commission stated that this course of action will minimize disruption to existing Remote Pickup BAS systems. Finally, the Commission noted that this
proposal is consistent with the treatment of Part 90 licensees that were operating on 5 kilohertz channels in the VHF band prior to the Refarming proceeding. 212

110. In the Notice, the Commission also noted that the 10 megahertz wide Group P channels are limited to operational communications, including tones for signaling and for remote control and
automatic transmission system control and telemetry. 213 Because there are only eight Group P channels (four at each end of the band) and they are limited to this specialized use, the Commission stated that it
was not inclined to alter them, but noted that, in light of the technological advances in radio, it was not convinced that the 50 kilohertz wide Group R and 100 kilohertz wide Group S channels are still needed.
The Commission declined to make specific proposals for these three groups of channels, but sought comment on the extent to which these channels are being used and asked whether their current bandwidth
designations should be maintained or aligned with the 6.25 kilohertz channel plan. 214
111. Finally, the Commission stated in the Notice that, because Remote Pickup Service licensees will benefit most by having the capability to choose from a wide variety of radios, and in

210 Id. at ¶ 67.
211 Id. at ¶ 68.
212 Id. at ¶ 69. See Replacement of Part 90 by Part 88 to Revise the Private Land Mobile Radio Services and Modify
the Policies Governing Them and Examination of Exclusivity and Frequency assignment Policies of the Private Land Mobile Radio Services, PR Docket No. 92- 235, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 11 FCC Rcd 17676

(1996).
213 47 C. F. R. § 74.402, Note 6.

214 Notice at ¶ 70.
43
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
44
accordance with the Commission’s proposal to standardize the Remote Pickup channels with those listed in Part 90, it believed that this service should adhere to the technical standards of Part 90. In this way,
Part 74 licensees could choose from among the wide variety of radios available for PLMRS licensees. Accordingly, for equipment designed to operate on channels with bandwidths of 30 kilohertz or less in
the VHF and UHF Remote Pickup Service bands, the Commission proposed that the equipment comply with the Part 90 technical rules for the emission mask 215 and frequency stability. 216 Additionally, the
Commission asked commenters to address whether the transient frequency behavior 217 rules in Section 90.214 would be appropriate to impose on Remote Pickup service transmitters. 218

112. Only SBE commented on this issue. SBE endorses the proposals to modify the channel plan consistent with the current Part 90 channel plan (i. e., stackable 7.5 kilohertz channels in the 150/ 160
MHz band and stackable 6.25 kilohertz channels in the 450 MHz band). Because licensees will have the option of using narrowband Part 90 radios, SBE believes that this change will benefit licensees through
significantly lower Remote Pickup equipment costs, especially with respect to dispatch and operational traffic. 219 To minimize the impact on current licensees, SBE recommends that no new restrictions be
imposed on allowable types of modulation on these channels. In addition, it supports the proposal to provide a three year transition period for licensees to migrate to the new channel plan, including the
option to remain on current channels on a secondary basis after three years.
113. With respect to technical parameters, SBE concurs with our proposal to apply the Part 90 emission masks and frequency stability requirements to narrow band Remote Pickup stations. It urges,

however, that we maintain the current requirements for 25 kilohertz or wider channels in Groups N1 and N2 and wideband channels in Groups R and S. It states that coordinators have already implemented plans,
including adjacent channel offsets, to accommodate these wide channels. SBE also recommends that we harmonize the Group P channels with the plan proposed for the Group N1 and N2 channels by
rechannelizing them to 6.25 kilohertz stackable to 12.5 kilohertz. Finally, SBE recommends grandfathering existing licensees using 10 kilohertz Group P channels. 220

114. Discussion. As described above, the only commenter on this issue, SBE, supports our proposals with some modification. We agree with their suggestions and adopt our proposals as modified
by those suggestions. Therefore, we will amend the channel plan for 150 MHz and 160 MHz Remote Pickup stations to list channels every 7.5 kilohertz and allow licensees to stack up to four channels for a
total of 30 megahertz. In addition, we will modify the Group N1 and N2 450 MHz channels to list channels every 6.25 kilohertz and allow licensees to stack up to eight channels for a total of 50
megahertz. As suggested by SBE, we will also modify the Group P channels to list them every 6.25 kHz
215 47 C. F. R. § 90.210.
216 47 C. F. R. § 90.213.
217 Transient frequencies are short- term variations of a transmitter’s operating frequency that occurs when a
transmitter is keyed on or off. During this period of off- frequency operation noise chirps are transmitted that could interfere with adjacent channel operations.

218 47 C. F. R. § 90.214. Notice at ¶ 71.
219 SBE Comments at 15- 16. SBE additionally states that Part 90 narrowband radios may not suit audio program
feeds requiring high fidelity and no real- time delay.
220 Id. at 16- 17.
44
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
45
and allow licensees to stack up to two channels. 221 Further, we will require new Remote Pickup station equipment designed to operate on channels 30 kilohertz wide or less to comply with the Part 90 technical
standards, including emission mask, frequency tolerance, and transient frequency behavior. By harmonizing all RPU channels and equipment with the Part 90 PLMR channel plan, licensees will benefit
from economies of scale resulting from the use of equipment consistent with Part 90 operations. Additionally, this will simplify station coordination and reduce the potential for harmful interference.

115. To ease the transition to this new channel plan, we adopt our proposal to provide a three-year period for licensees operating on the channels adopted in 1984 to modify their licenses to the new
channels. After three years, they may remain on their current channel assignments, but on a secondary, non- interference basis. Consistent with our action for the N1 and N2 channels we will also provide three
years to licensees operating on the 10 kilohertz P channels to modify their licensees to the new channel plan. After that time they may remain on their current channel assignment but on a secondary basis. This
will provide for a smooth transition to the new channels where incumbent operations will not inhibit the growth of systems on the new frequency plan.

6. Federal Narrowbanding of 162- 174 MHz Band Land Mobile Frequencies
116. The Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee 222 (IRAC) has been working to reduce the bandwidth of Federal Government land mobile operations in a number of frequency bands, including

the 162- 174 MHz band. Based on the work of the IRAC, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) adopted a policy which requires all new Federal Government systems
after January 1, 1995, and all Federal Government systems after January 1, 2005, in the 162- 174 MHz band to be capable of operating within a 12.5 kilohertz channel. 223 Under our rules, Remote Pickup BAS
may, with certain geographic restrictions, use the frequencies 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz on a secondary basis to Federal Government use. 224 The rules currently allow licensees on these channels to
operate on 25 kilohertz channels 225 and do not provide any procedures for transitioning to narrower 12.5 kilohertz channels. In addition, these two frequencies are used in the Emergency Alert System (EAS) 226

221 The new channel centers resulting from modifying the Group P channels are: 450.00625 MHz, 450.0125 MHz,
450.01875 MHz, 450.025 MHz, 450.98125 MHz, 450.9875 MHz, 450.99375 MHz, 455.00625 MHz, 455.0125 MHz, 455.01875 MHz, 455.025 MHz, 455.98125 MHz, 455.9875 MHz, and 455.99375 MHz.

222 The IRAC is chaired by the Department of Commerce/ NTIA and consists of representatives from a number of
Federal Agencies and assists the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information in assigning frequencies to U. S. Government radio stations and in developing and executing policies, programs,

procedures, and technical criteria pertaining to the allocation, management, and use of the spectrum. See NTIA Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Frequency Management (NTIA Manual), Section 1.3.

223 See NTIA Manual, Section 4.3.7A. The bands subject to Federal Government narrowbanding are
162.0125- 173.2 MHz and 173.4- 174 MHz.
224 47 C. F. R. § 74.402. The exceptions are within 150 miles of New York City, where these frequencies are reserved
for use by public safety users; in Alaska; or in the Tennessee Valley Authority area. The Tennessee Valley Authority Area is described in detail in Footnote US11. This area encompasses Tennessee, the southern portion of

Kentucky, southwest Virginia, most of Mississippi and Alabama, Northern Georgia, the northwest corner of South Carolina, and western North Carolina.

225 47 C. F. R. § 74.462.
226 47 C. F. R. Part 11.
45
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
46
in some areas to relay information to local stations for dissemination to the public. 227 Despite this secondary status, it has been the policy of NTIA and the FCC to protect stations used for EAS from
harmful interference.
117. To ensure continued successful sharing of the spectrum with Federal Government users, we proposed to conform Remote Pickup BAS use of the 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz frequencies to the

12.5 kilohertz channel size, and to meet the January 1, 2005 implementation schedule applicable for all Federal Government users. We sought comment on the advantages and disadvantages of implementing
this proposal for BAS licensees, notwithstanding the need for new equipment. We asked if migrating to the narrow channels would degrade the quality of the information being transmitted. Additionally, we
proposed to formally acknowledge the protected status of non- Federal Government stations operating on these frequencies that are used as an integral part of the EAS. We sought comment on these proposals as
well as proposed amendments to Section 2.106, footnote US11, and Section 74.462 of our rules to implement these proposals. 228

118. SBE and NTIA were the only parties commenting on this issue. SBE supports our proposals to mandate the conversion of Remote Pickup BAS to 12.5 kilohertz channels on 166.25 MHz
and 170.15 MHz by January 1, 2005. SBE also suggests that Remote Pickup BAS base station use of 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz for EAS be upgraded to co- primary status with Federal Government use. It
states that this would be consistent with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) use of 2 GHz BAS band, which was upgraded to primary status in the Second Report and Order and
Second Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket No. 95- 18. 229 NTIA supports a different approach. It asks that Remote Pickup BAS base stations operating on these frequencies be given only
“protected” status, which would give them the same protection that currently is accorded them. 230
119. Discussion: Conforming the technical standards for BAS operations at 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz to those of the Federal Government would protect Federal Government operations and

227 Notice at ¶¶ 72- 73.
228 Id. at ¶ 73.
229 SBE Comments at 16. See Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission’s Rules to Allocate Spectrum at
2 GHz for Use by the Mobile- Satellite Service, Second Report and Order and Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET Docket No. 95- 18, 15 FCC Rcd 12315 (2000). In this proceeding, NTIA asked the Commission to

provide primary status to Government space operations, earth exploration satellites, and space research in the 2025- 2110 MHz band. NASA stated that it had been using this band for almost thirty years for satellites which support
such major programs as the Space Shuttle, the Hubble Space Telescope, the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System and will use this spectrum to support the International Space Station. The Commission concluded that in
view of the successful sharing between BAS and Government satellite operations in the past, Government satellite operations could be elevated to co- primary status. It stated that this change would provide increased certainty and
clarity to the U. S. Table of Frequency Allocations. The Commission, however, did express concern about the impact of this change on the future deployment of BAS and adopted measures to minimize such impact.

230 Letter to Mr. Bruce Franca, Acting Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications
Commission, from William T. Hatch, Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, United States Department of Commerce, Aug. 7, 2001.
46
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
47
provide benefits to Remote Pickup BAS users. 231 For example, it would simplify coordination and improve adjacent channel performance. Therefore, in accordance with the comments of SBE and our
proposal, we are amending the rules to require that existing and applied for Remote Pickup BAS facilities on 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz use no more than 12.5 kilohertz channel bandwidth by January 1, 2005.
This will apply to all stations on these frequencies that obtained licenses or applied for licenses on or before the effective date of the rules in this Report and Order. 232 This approach will ensure that existing
licensed stations and applicants who are planning stations on these frequencies have adequate time to transition to narrowband equipment. To further ease this transition, we will not require licensees to
modify their licenses. Instead, the Commission will automatically issue a superseded license, effective January 1, 2005, showing the reduction in authorized bandwidth. 233 Additionally, in the event that the
January 1, 2005 deadline for Federal Government systems is extended, we will consider amending the Rules to implement the extension for Non- Government systems on the 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz
frequencies as well. Stations applied for after the effective date of the rules in this Report and Order must comply with the 12.5 kilohertz channel bandwidth requirement. Rather than placing these requirements
in footnote US11 as proposed, we will instead amend Section 74.462. 234 This action is appropriate as it consolidates all Remote Pickup BAS service rules in one place.

120. With respect to Remote Pickup BAS base stations operating as an integral part of the EAS, we are adopting a procedure recommended by NTIA to ensure that such stations will be
protected. 235 Under this procedure NTIA will place a notation in the Government Master Frequency (GMF) database licensing record of these stations which will require Government stations to protect them
from harmful interference. 236 Thus, there is no need to amend footnote US11. 237
7. 950 MHz Aural BAS Channel Splits

231 Our action here does not amend the rules for public safety stations operating on 166.25 MHz or 170.15 MHz
under the rules in 47 C. F. R. § 90.20. The Commission will address service rules for those stations in a future proceeding.

232 We note that as of August 29, 2002, there is only one application pending for new Remote Pickup BAS use of
166.25 MHz or 170.15 MHz.
233 We cannot predict the exact date on which the Commission will issue the superseded license at this time.
However, the effective date of the license will be January 1, 2005 regardless of whether the license is issued prior to or subsequent to that date. Thus, on January 1, 2005 all licensees on 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz will be required

to operate on 12.5 kilohertz channels.
234 47 C. F. R. § 74.462.

235 Originally, NTIA recommended that these BAS stations be given “protected” status. However, such a status is
not defined in our rules.
236 See Letter to Mr. Edmond J. Thomas, Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications
Commission, from Fredrick R. Wentland, Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Spectrum Management, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, United States Department of Commerce,

Aug. 6, 2002.
237 We are, however, making editorial changes to footnote US11 to improve its readability.
47
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
48
121. 950 MHz Aural BAS Channel Splits. The Report and Order in MM Docket 85- 36 238 specified that the 950 MHz Aural BAS Channel Plan listed in Section 74.502( b) would become effective
upon a future Order from the Commission to be issued when the licensing system was capable of accommodating this channel plan. With the implementation of ULS for licensing, we are implementing
that rule section with this Report and Order.
C. Universal Licensing System and BAS
122. The ULS is an automated licensing system and integrated database designed to provide greater efficiency in the licensing process by using a consolidated set of application forms, automating

many license review processes, and facilitating electronic application filing and data retrieval. The Commission’s WTB, which is responsible for licensing BAS, began using ULS for Aural and TV BAS
licensing in August, 1999 239 and for Remote Pickup BAS in September, 2000. 240 As a result, several BAS service rules require updating to reflect new ULS application processing procedures. Many of these
changes, such as updating application form numbers, are ministerial in nature and are being adopted without discussion. 241 In other cases, more substantive rule changes are necessary and are discussed
below.
1. Application Procedures and Construction Periods
123. The ULS Report and Order consolidated the application and processing rules for all wireless services into Subpart F of Part 1, 242 now the only rule section that wireless applicants and

licensees, including BAS applicants and licensees, must consult regarding application procedures, such those as for amendments, modifications, and STAs. 243 In the Notice, the Commission proposed to amend
Sections 1.901 and 1.902 to add the appropriate references to Part 74 and to add a new section, Section 74.6, to reference the application and processing rules in Part 1, Subpart F. Under this proposed licensing
scheme, aural and TV BAS stations would be licensed using identical forms and procedures as used for

238 See Review of Technical and Operational Requirements: Part 74- E Aural Broadcast STL and ICR Stations; and
Part 74- F TV Auxiliary Broadcast Stations, Report and Order, MM Docket No. 85- 36, 102 F. C. C. 2d 940 (FCC 85- 588) (1985) (950 MHz Rechannelization Order). The 950 MHz Rechannelization Order at ¶ 29 amended these rules

to be effective on the date specified in a future order by the Chief, Mass Media Bureau, indicating computer programs are available for implementing the new rules.

239 See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau To Begin Use Of Universal Licensing System (ULS) For Microwave
Services On August 30, 1999, DA 99- 1543, Public Notice, rel. Aug. 6, 1999.
240 See Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Implements Phase I Of a Three- Phased Deployment of the Universal
Licensing System for Land Mobile Radio Services on September 19, 2000, DA 00- 1992, Public Notice, rel. Sep. 1, 2000.

241 These changes were included in proposed rules. See Notice at Appendix C.
242 See Biennial Regulatory Review – Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 13, 22, 24, 26, 27, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97, and 101 of the
Commission’s Rules to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, WT Docket No. 98- 20, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd. 21027 (1998) (ULS Report

and Order), at 21055.
243 47 C. F. R. §§ 1.929 and 1.931.
48
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
49
Part 101 microwave applicants. Remote Pickup BAS stations would be licensed using the same forms and procedures that are used for Part 90 PLMRS applicants. 244
124. In the ULS Report and Order, the Commission adopted rules that eliminate letter requests for all purposes where a form can be used, 245 stating that this will, “reduce applicant and licensee burdens,
increase efficiency and better serve the public interest.” 246 In keeping with this policy and the stated benefits, the Commission proposed in the Notice to amend the Part 74 rules for BAS to eliminate the
informal application for STA 247 and require that STA requests follow the procedures outlined in Section 1.931. 248

125. Under the Part 1, Subpart F rules, the Commission issues a license which specifies the construction period set forth in the rule part governing the specific service. Licensees are to notify the
Commission when operations commence, and licensees that fail to commence operations within the required construction period automatically forfeit their license. 249 In order to align BAS construction
rules with these requirements, and with current practices regarding construction periods for BAS, the Commission also proposed in the Notice to amend certain rules in Part 73 and create a new Section 74.34.
This new section references the construction requirements in Subpart F of Part 1; a construction period of 12 months – the period allowed for PLMRS stations authorized under Part 90 - for Remote Pickup BAS;
and a construction period of 18 months for TV and aural BAS stations. 250
126. Commenting parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice regarding BAS applications procedures. 251 SBE, however, asks that ULS be modified to allow both transmit and

receive locations to be specified on Form 601 for remote pick- up stations used as point- to- point telemetry return links, to more accurately reflect how such stations are used. 252 SBE and MSTV/ NAB support the
proposals regarding STA procedures for BAS. 253 SBE points out, however, that requiring BAS STAs to follow Section 1.931 procedures would require electronic filing. 254

127. Commenting parties also support the proposals regarding BAS construction
244 Notice at ¶ 75.

245 See ULS Report and Order at 21052.
246 Id.
247 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.433( b), 74.537( b), and 74.633( b). An informal application has generally been interpreted to
mean a letter request.
248 Notice at ¶ 78.

249 47 C. F. R. § 1 .946.
250 Notice at ¶¶ 76- 77.
251 See, e. g., MSTV/ NAB Comments at 11; SBE Comments at 17; Viacom Reply Comments at 3. Viacom states
that it supports the comments of MSTV/ NAB and SBE.
252 SBE Comments at 17, 25.

253 SBE Comments at 17; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 12.
254 SBE Comments at 17.
49
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
50
requirements. 255 KNME states that the construction periods proposed in the Notice would discourage hoarding by speculative applicants. KNME also urges that we require a licensee to file a certification of
completion of construction via the ULS, to track false construction claims. 256 Similarly, SBE states that the proposed periods are more than adequate for any applicant who truly intends to build, and not just
“warehouse” frequencies. 257
128. Discussion. We are adopting our proposals from the Notice regarding applications and STA filing procedures. We are amending Sections 1.901 and 1.902 to reference Part 74 and are adding a

new Section 74.6 258 to reference BAS applicants and licensees to the application and processing rules in Part 1, Subpart F. These changes will simplify our rules and result in processing efficiencies for BAS
licensing. We observe that specific changes to the ULS system, including forms, affect multiple services. Thus, we lack adequate notice to all potentially affected services and we therefore decline to adopt
changes to Form 601 as requested by SBE. 259 We note that no commenter opposes our proposal with respect to STAs. Therefore, we are also adopting the proposals amending Part 74 to require that BAS
STA requests follow the procedures outlined in Section 1.931. We clarify that electronic filing is not required for STAs; they may be filed either electronically or manually. 260

129. We are also adopting the proposed rule amendments to remove the construction requirements for BAS stations from Part 73 and place them in a new Section 74.34. This approach will
promote timely construction of facilities, ensure consistent construction requirements among the services, and prevent warehousing of spectrum. As for the concern of KNME that licensees be required to file a
certification of completion of construction, we note that the rules already require licensees to file a notification of completion of construction. Failure to file such a notification results in the termination of
the license by the Commission. 261
2. Classification of Filings as Major or Minor
130. In the ULS Report and Order, the Commission adopted rules to define certain actions as major changes for all wireless services. Additionally, the Commission adopted rules which define major

changes for each service category. Minor changes are defined as all changes that are not major. 262 These
255 SBE Comments at 17; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 12; KNME Reply Comments at 1.
256 KNME Reply Comments at 1.
257 SBE Comments at 17.
258 We are revising the text of the proposed Section 74.6 to clarify that applicants for Remote Pickup, aural BAS,
TV BAS, and low power auxiliary stations under Subparts D, E, F, and H of Part 74 may file manually or electronically under Part 1 procedures.

259 Commenters also requested several other changes to the ULS processing and search capabilities. See SBE
Comments at 24- 26; SBE Reply Comments at 8; Viacom Reply Comments at 4. We note that these functions of the licensing system are not subject to rulemaking and are not addressed herein. Comments and concerns regarding

upgrades and enhancements of the ULS should be addressed to the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
260 See Appendix A, infra, at § 74.6.

261 47 C. F. R. § 1.946( d).
262 See ULS Report and Order at 21058.
50
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
51
designations when used in conjunction with other adopted rule amendments assist the Commission in streamlining the licensing process. As an example, Section 1.947( b) allows applicants to make minor
modifications to their stations without prior Commission approval so long as they file an application form within thirty days of making such a modification. 263 ULS can automatically determine if an application
for modification is major or minor, and can then process these applications without the need for intervention by Commission staff. 264

131. Accordingly, the Commission proposed to amend the Part 74 rules to adhere to the procedures adopted in the ULS proceeding for major and minor amendments and modifications; i. e.,
amendments to aural and TV BAS applications and modifications to aural and TV BAS licenses would be evaluated based on the rules defining a major change in Sections 1.929( a) and 1.929( d), and Remote
Pickup BAS applications would follow the rules set forth in Sections 1.929( a) and 1.929( c)( 4). In many cases, the rules adopted in the ULS Report and Order provide more flexibility than is afforded BAS
licensees under Part 74. For example, Sections 74.551 and 74.651 require aural and TV BAS licensees to file an application and obtain Commission approval for any change in which the location of the
transmitting antenna changes, but Section 1.929( d)( 1)( i) classifies changes in transmitting antenna location that are 5 seconds or less in latitude and/ or longitude as minor. 265 The proposal made in the
Notice would implement rule changes that treat BAS applicants in a consistent manner with the treatment given other wireless services. 266

132. Although commenting parties generally support the proposals set forth in the Notice, 267 several express some concern. MSTV/ NAB urge that full coordination be required for all station
modifications, whether major or minor. 268 For example, they state that a 5 second change in latitude and/ or longitude by a BAS transmitting antenna (a minor change under the ULS rules) could create
interference to other licensees in congested areas if not fully coordinated. SBE agrees and also requests that frequency coordination be required for all changes from analog to digital modulation because
digitally modulated signals which tend to more fully occupy the channel bandwidth than analog signals, increase the possibility of interference from BAS stations into adjacent channel FM receivers. 269 MRC
recommends that if a BAS licensee coordinates with a local coordinating body, conversion from analog to multiplexed digital/ analog operation should be treated as a minor amendment. 270

133. Discussion. We are adopting our proposals to amend the Part 74 rules so that BAS applicants and licensees are subject to the same rules as specified for the land mobile and microwave
services for determining major and minor application and license changes. This action will align Remote

263 47 C. F. R. § 1.947( b).
264 Notice at ¶ 79.
265 47 C. F. R. § 1.929( d)( 1)( i).
266 Notice at ¶ 80.
267 SBE Comments at 17- 18; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 12; MRC Comments at 7.
268 MSTV/ NAB Comments at 12, 15.
269 SBE Comments at 1- 2, 17.
270 MRC Comments at 7.
51
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
52
Pickup BAS processing rules with those for similar services under Part 90 and align the rules for TV and aural BAS with the rules for Part 101. Thus, similar stations will be treated in a consistent manner.
134. With regard to the concerns of MSTV/ NAB, SBE, and MRC, we note that changes in emissions, such as a conversion from analog to digital modulation or to composite analog/ digital
modulation, are already classified as major changes under the rules in Sections 1.929( c)( 4)( ii) and (d)( 1)( iv), 271 and frequency coordination would be required when a major change is requested. 272 With
regard to location changes of less than 5 seconds in latitude and/ or longitude, 273 we note that the Commission in the ULS Reconsideration Order 274 clarified that such minor changes are not exempt from
the coordination requirement. The Commission explained that an applicant requesting a minor change must still coordinate as required by Section 101.103( d)( 2)( ix) prior to implementing the change and that
this process is sufficient to ensure that minor changes are properly coordinated to avoid harmful interference, without imposing an unnecessary filing burden on applicants. 275 We find that this procedure
will work equally well for Part 74 services.
3. Emission Designators
135. Section 74.462 of the Commission’s rules specifies authorized emissions for Remote Pickup BAS frequencies and frequency bands. 276 In the Notice, the Commission observed that this

section contains emission designators that no longer conform to current ITU specifications or to those contained in Subpart C of Part 2 of the Commission’s rules. 277 For example, F3Y, which was the original
emission designator for digitized voice modulation, is specified for most of the Remote Pickup BAS frequency bands. This emission designator should now be updated to F1E (frequency modulated
single- channel digital telephony) or G1E (phase modulated single- channel digital telephony) emission. Accordingly, in the Notice the Commission proposed to update Section 74.462 to replace all outdated
emission designators with emission designators that conform to ITU specifications and Part 2 rules. 278
136. SBE and MSTV/ NAB both support the proposal set forth in the Notice to update emission designators to conform to ITU specifications and Part 2 rules.

271 47 C. F. R. § 1.929.
272 47 C. F. R. § 101.103( d)( 1).
273 A change of 5 seconds in latitude corresponds to a distance of approximately 150 meters (500 feet).
274 Biennial Regulatory Review – Amendment of Parts 0, 1, 13, 22, 24, 26, 27, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97, and 101 of the
Commission’s Rules to Facilitate the Development and Use of the Universal Licensing System in the Wireless Telecommunications Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, WT Docket No. 98- 20, 14

FCC Rcd 11476 (1999) (ULS Reconsideration Order).
275 ULS Reconsideration Order at ¶¶ 15- 16; 47 C. F. R. § 101.103.

276 47 C. F. R. § 74.462. Footnote 4 of this rule section states that the emission designators will be modified after
necessary modifications are made to BAS application processing programs are completed.
277 See ITU Radio Regulations, Appendix 1, Classification of Emissions and Necessary Bandwidths; 47 C. F. R. §
2.201.
278 Notice at ¶ 81.
52
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
53
137. Discussion: This proposal was supported by SBE and MSTV/ NAB and was not opposed by any commenter. 279 Thus, we are adopting our proposal and updating the emission designators of
Section 74.462. 280
D. Additional BAS Issues
138. In addition to our proposals, several commenters request that the Commission address additional issues. These include narrowband channel plans for digital BAS operations, 281 reallocation of

the 1.7 GHz band for public safety; 282 eligibility and permissibility of wireless microphones for game communications; 283 codification of co- equal status of BAS and public safety licensees at 2450- 2483.5
MHz; 284 addition of special conditions for experimental authorizations on broadcast or BAS frequencies; 285 and elimination of priority of use exemptions for Remote Pickup BAS I and R channels. 286
These issues were not raised in the Notice and thus lack adequate notice to all potentially affected parties. We therefore decline to address them here. 287

279 SBE Comments at 19; MSTV/ NAB Comments at 12.
280 The updated list of emission designators in Section 74.462( b) have been expanded from those proposed to
include non- voice digital traffic. Their omission in the Notice, was an oversight as telegraphy, telemetry, and data are currently permitted.

281 Comsearch Comments at 2; MRC Comments at 9; TIA Reply Comments at 2.
282 See MRC Comments at 10.
283 See SBE Comments at 22- 24.
284 See SBE Comments at 24.
285 See SBE Comments at 26- 27.
286 See SBE Comments at 27. Priority of use in Section 74.403( b) provides a ranking of Remote Pickup BAS
transmissions to be observed when more than one licensee attempts to use the same frequency in the same area. 47 C. F. R. § 74.403. The priorities, from highest to lowest, are: 1) emergency communications, 2) program material for

broadcast, 3) cues and orders necessary to a broadcast, 4) operational communications, and 5) tests or drills. Currently certain channels are exempted from the priority of use rules. SBE suggests that we amend the rules for a
subset (I- and R- channels) of the currently exempted channels so that they are subject to the priority of use rules. The I- channels are 20 kHz channels on 26.07 MHz, 26.11 MHz, and 26.45 MHz. The R- channels are 25 kHz
channels, stackable to 50 kHz, in the 450.625- 450.875 MHz and 455.625- 455.875 MHz bands. We did not propose to change this rule and no party resonded to SBE's suggestion. Without sufficient comment, we are concerned that
interested parties have not had sufficient notice to comment on this issue, and that a change to these channels could disrupt a licensee's operations.

287 Commenters may always file a petition for rulemaking to the Commission regarding their specific concerns. In
many cases, there is an on- going Commission proceeding where these concerns can be addressed. For example, in ET Docket No. 00- 258, the Commission recently reallocated the 1.7 GHz band for Advanced Wireless Services.

See, Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission’s Rules to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third Generation Wireless
Systems, ET Docket No. 00- 258, Second Report and Order, FCC 02- 304 (adopted November 7, 2002). In addition, we note that the Commission has recently clarified that public safety and BAS share the 2450- 2483.5 MHz
band on a co- equal basis and therefore current rules are sufficient. See County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, City of Long Beach, and City of Burbank, California, Request for Declaratory Ruling Regarding Use of
(continued….)
53
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
54
E. AMPTP Petition
139. Video assist devices produce low resolution images that can be used by a production crew to make decisions with respect to content, lighting, and image framing. 288 Often, these video assist

devices are connected via cable. However, cable is not always practical due to the distance from the camera to the video monitor or because the camera needs to be mobile to follow the action. 289 Also, when
cables are used, a staff person must tend to them to ensure the safety of the actors and the crew. 290 To improve their utility and increase safety, the Commission, based on a petition filed by AMPTP, 291
proposed to allow the use of wireless assist video devices (WAVDs) on a secondary, non- interference basis on unused TV channels in the upper VHF and the UHF bands.

1. Authorization of WAVDs
140. The Notice proposed that WAVDs be authorized as low power auxiliary stations on a non- interference basis to any existing or future allocated services operating in accordance with the Table

of Allocations in Part 2 of our rules. 292 Further, the Notice proposed that WAVD users be responsible for correcting any instance of harmful interference using any means necessary, up to and including shutting
down the transmitter. Consistent with the treatment of wireless microphones in this spectrum, the Notice did not propose to change the existing broadcasting service allocation. 293

141. AMPTP and SBE support the Notice’s proposal to authorize WAVDs. SBE asks, however, that the secondary status of WAVDs be clarified by defining their transmissions as “operational
communications” under Section 74.403( b). 294 In its reply, AMPTP opposes SBE’s proposal to classify WAVDs as “operational communications.” AMTP states that it would support an effort to place WAVDs
in the priority of communications list, but only after it has an opportunity to monitor the efficiency of, and the demand for WAVDs. Otherwise, AMPTP argues their development and transition into the

(Continued from previous page) the 2450- 2483.5 MHz Band for Airborne Video Public Safety Communications, Order, 16 FCC Rcd 2227 (2001) at
¶¶ 4- 5.
288 See AMPTP Petition at 2- 3.

289 Id. at 3.
290 Id.
291 AMPTP Petition, RM- 9856, filed November 15, 1999.
292 47 C. F. R. § 2.106.
293 Notice at ¶ 94. The 470- 512 MHz band is also allocated to land mobile radio services.
294 SBE Comments at 19. 47 C. F. R. § 74.403( b) establishes a priority for remote pickup transmissions: (1)
Communications during an emergency or pending emergency directly related to the safety of life and property; (2) Program material to be broadcast; (3) Cues, orders, and other related communications immediately necessary to the

accomplishment of a broadcast; (4) Operational communications; and (5) Tests or drills to check the performance of stand- by or emergency circuits.
54
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
55
marketplace could be hindered 295
142. Discussion. For the reasons stated in the Notice and based on the comments, we are adopting our proposal to allow the use of WAVDs on a secondary, non- interference basis on vacant upper

VHF- TV and UHF- TV channels. Specific details regarding the operation of these devices are discussed in detail below. With respect to SBE’s request to classify WAVD transmissions as “operational
communications,” we note that those rules pertain to Remote Pickup BAS stations. In the Notice, we proposed to authorize WAVDs as low power auxiliary stations under Part 74, Subpart H. We continue to
believe that this is the appropriate subpart in which to place WAVDs due to their similarity to existing low power auxiliary devices, rather than the Remote Pickup BAS rules. If after gaining experience with
WAVDs, we determine that communications on television channels needs to be prioritized, we can revisit this issue.

2. Eligibility, Permitted Use, and Licensing
143. The Notice proposed that all entities eligible to hold a Part 74 license, including motion picture and television producers as defined in Section 74.801, be eligible to operate WAVDs. 296 The

Notice proposed to limit WAVD use to production facilities or locations used to produce material being filmed or taped for later showing on television broadcast stations. Under this proposal, WAVDs could not
be used for ENG operations or to assist with the production of live events. Additionally, the Notice proposed that WAVDs be excluded from operating under the short- term operation rules used by other Part
74 licensees. 297 These proposed restrictions are intended to minimize the possibility for interference. 298
144. The Notice also proposed that WAVD users obtain an FCC station license using FCC Form 601, Main Form and Schedule H, 299 prior to operating. We proposed that the license term for a

WAVD license be concurrent with the normal licensing period for TV broadcast stations located in the same area of operation. This is consistent with the licensing term for other BAS stations. 300 The Notice
further proposed that a WAVD licensee not be geographically limited, but be subject only to channel separation and notification rules. Additionally, because of the proposed limited eligibility for WAVDs and
the nature of their use, the Notice proposed that WAVD licenses be non- assignable and non- transferable. 301
145. AMPTP agrees with the proposal to restrict WAVD use from ENG and the production of live events. 302 It also agrees with the restriction on assignment and transfer of WAVD licenses. 303

295 Id. at 6- 7.
296 47 C. F. R. § 74.801. These definitions refer to persons or organizations engaged in the production of motion
pictures or television programs.
297 The short- term operation rule allows eligible entities to operate using BAS frequencies for up to 720 hours per
year without an authorization from the Commission. See 47 C. F. R. § 74.24.
298 Notice at ¶ 95.

299 FCC Form 601, Schedule H is used to provide technical data for certain BAS stations, including remote pickup
stations and wireless microphones.
300 47 C. F. R. § 74.15.

301 Notice at ¶¶ 90- 91.
302 AMPTP Comments at 4.
55
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
56
However, it requests that WAVD use be expanded to allow the use of WAVDs in the production of cable, satellite, and motion picture events. 304 Further, AMPTP anticipating that independent contractors may
desire to operate WAVDs and rent them to production studios, asks that the Commission specifically permit third party rental. It states that such rentals could be restricted, if needed, to only those directly
involved in authorized television and motion picture programming to avert unauthorized or frivolous use. 305

146. SBE expresses caution regarding third party contractors. SBE urges that the FCC not allow WAVD licenses to be assignable to independent contractors. It states that the necessary
responsibility and accountability borne by a WAVD licensee would be diluted if third- party contractors were allowed to operate WAVDs under the license obtained by a production studio. Instead, SBE
recommends that an independent contractor obtain its own license for a WAVD to ensure proper WAVD use. 306 AMPTP, in reply comments states that licensees can be held accountable for full compliance with
the Commission’s rules by end users and that third party rental should be allowed. 307
147. Discussion. We are adopting our proposal to permit all entities eligible to hold Part 74 licenses to use WAVDs. As stated above, this includes television and motion picture producers. We are

also adopting our proposal to restrict the use of WAVDs from use at live events or for ENG operations. We clarify that WAVDs may be used to produce cable, satellite, and motion picture events for later
showing on television (through free over the air TV, cable TV systems, and satellite TV systems) or in theaters, but may not be used in the production of live events. Similarly, we are adopting our proposal that
WAVDs be excluded from operating under the short- term operation rule. This will ensure that WAVDs are properly coordinated and television stations, notified, to ensure that the potential of these devices to
interfere with television broadcasts is minimized.
148. We are also adopting our proposal to require that WAVD stations be licensed prior to operating. Such licenses will be obtained through the ULS using FCC Form 601. In addition, consistent

with our licensing of other low power auxiliary devices, WAVD licenses will normally be issued for a period of eight years and, for those held by a broadcast station, run concurrently with the license term of
that station. 308 For other license holders, the expiration date will be determined by the area of the country in which the station operates. 309 These proposals were unopposed by commenters.

149. Finally, we address the request of AMPTP to allow third party contractors to obtain WAVD licenses. AMPTP states that third party contractors may wish to operate and/ or rent WAVDs to
studios. We are leery about expanding the eligibility of WAVDs beyond the entities already discussed. As stated in the Notice, the production industry and the broadcast industry rely on each other – one to produce

(Continued from previous page) 303 AMPTP Reply Comments at 5.
304 AMPTP Comments at 4.
305 Id. at 5.
306 SBE Comments at 21.
307 AMPTP Reply Comments at 5- 6.
308 47 C. F. R. § 74.15( b).
309 47 C. F. R. § 73.1020.
56
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
57
content and the other to distribute content – and have a vested interest to operate in a manner that is mutually agreeable. 310 Therefore, we will not expand the eligibility for WAVD licenses to entities beyond
those proposed. We stress that this does not preclude the operation of WAVDs by third party contractors. A party under contract to a television or motion picture producer may rent equipment and even operate it
for the producer. However, such operation would be under the authority of the producer’s license. This arrangement is consistent with rules in other services where entities are able to operate equipment under
the authority of another entity’s license. 311 Based on our experience, we believe that this arrangement best promotes accountability and compliance with our rules.

3. Authorized Frequencies
150. The Notice proposed to allow WAVDs to operate on unused television broadcast frequencies in the 180- 210 MHz band (corresponding to VHF- TV channels 8- 12) and the 470- 608 MHz

and 614- 698 MHz bands (corresponding to UHF- TV channels 14- 36 and 38- 51). The Notice also proposed to define areas in which WAVD co- channel operation would be excluded in the 470- 512 MHz
band (TV channels 14- 20) to protect land mobile operations in designated cities. Similarly, the Notice proposed to exclude WAVDs from operating within 52 km of the Gulf of Mexico in the 476- 494 MHz
band to protect the Offshore Radiotelephone Service (ORS) and PLMRS operations in the Gulf of Mexico. The Notice also proposed to exclude WAVDs from operating in the 608- 614 MHz band (TV
channel 37) to protect radio astronomy operations and within 52 km of Hawaii in the 488- 494 MHz band to protect inter- island communications. 312

151. No party specifically addressed the proposed frequencies, other than to express general support for using selected TV channels. 313 SBE, however, does reiterate comments it made in GN Docket
No. 01- 74 asking that guard band spectrum in the lower 700 MHz band can be used as a home for all low power auxiliary devices under Part 74, Subpart H. 314

152. Discussion. As an initial matter, we note that SBE’s comments regarding the use of a guard band in the 700 MHz band for low power auxiliary devices is beyond the scope of this proceeding
and will not be addressed herein. In light of the lack of comments on this issue, we adopt our proposals regarding authorized frequencies as proposed. Accordingly, WAVDs may operate on unused television
broadcast frequencies in the 180- 210 MHz, 470- 608 MHz and 614- 698 MHz bands. As proposed, we will not allow WAVDs to operate in the 174- 180 MHz and 210- 216 MHz bands (TV channels 7 and 13),
in order to protect the Low Power Radio Service (LPRS), which supports auditory assistance devices and health care aids that operate pursuant to Part 95 and other low power devices operating under 90.265 of
our rules. 315 In addition, this channel restriction will protect from interference the Navy’s SPASUR radar
310 Notice at ¶ 93.

311 See, e. g., 47 C. F. R. § 90.421. This rule allows mobile stations to be installed in vehicles operated by persons
other than the licensee. The licensee is responsible for taking any necessary precaution to effectively eliminate the possibility of unauthorized operation of transmitters when not under the control of the licensee. The rule

specifically allows contractors to operate mobile units.
312 Notice at ¶¶ 96- 99.

313 See, e. g., AMPTP Reply Comments at 3.
314 SBE Comments at 20.
315 47 C. F. R. § 90.265 and Part 95, Subpart G.
57
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
58
system, which operates in the 216.88- 217.08 MHz band. 316 We find that given the amount of spectrum we are authorizing for WAVDs, these restrictions will have minimal impact on their ability to identify
spectrum on which to operate.
153. We adopt the proposal to exclude WAVDs from using land mobile radio channels 317 in the 470- 512 MHz band (TV channels 14- 20) in areas around the coordinates listed in Section 90.303

because nomadic WAVDs could not likely share spectrum with land mobile operations. 318 We also adopt the proposal to require WAVDs to maintain at least 6 megahertz frequency separation from such land
mobile channels when operating within these areas. This frequency and geographic separation is necessary to protect public safety land mobile use, which in the 470- 512 MHz private land mobile bands
could occur on any of the channels allocated in a given area. 319 Therefore, all TV channels listed in Section 90.303 are excluded from WAVD use at the locations listed. 320 As discussed in the Notice, the
band 482- 488 MHz (TV channel 16) will also be excluded from WAVD use in the New York City area to protect New York City public safety entities which are using that spectrum under a waiver. 321 Similarly,
the band 476- 494 MHz (TV channels 15- 17) will be excluded from WAVD in areas near the Gulf of Mexico to protect the PLMRS 322 and communication links in the ORS under Part 22 of our rules. 323
Communications with mobile stations under these rules are generally limited to stations within the Gulf (e. g., stations on boats or aircraft) or to stations on the shore. Finally, WAVDs will be excluded from the
band 488- 494 MHz (TV channel 17) in areas near Hawaii to protect common carrier control and repeater stations for point- to- point inter- island communications. 324

154. The frequencies on which we will exclude WAVD use are summarized in the table
316 The SPASUR radar system is located in the southern United States and consists of three high power transmitters
and six receiver locations. These operations are protected indefinitely for non- Government FS and mobile services by footnote US229. See 47 C. F. R. § 2.106 Note US229. Additionally, we note that pursuant to the Balanced

Budget Act of 1997, the entire 216- 220 MHz band was designated by NTIA for transfer to non- Government use and subject to licensing by competitive bidding. See Pub. L. 105- 33, 111 Stat. 251 (1997). The use of the
216- 220 MHz band is being examined in ET Docket No. 00- 221. See In the Matter of Reallocation of the 216- 220 MHz, 1390- 1395 MHz, 1427- 1429 MHz, 1429- 1432 MHz, 1432- 1435 MHz, 1670- 1675 MHz, and
2385- 2390 MHz Government Transfer Bands, ET Docket No. 00- 221, Notice of Proposed Rule Making, rel. Nov. 20, 2000.

317 47 C. F. R. Part 90, Subpart L. See also, 47 C. F. R. §§ 22.591, 22.621, 22.651, and 22.1007.
318 We address the separation requirements below.
319 All channel assignments in the 470- 512 MHz band are made out of a general access pool. See 47 C. F. R. §
90.303.
320 47 C. F. R. § 90.303.

321 See In the Matter of Waiver of Parts 2 and 90 of the Commission's Rules to Permit New York Metropolitan Area
Public Safety Agencies to Use Frequencies at 482- 488 MHz on a Conditional Basis, Order, 10 FCC Rcd 4466 (1995).

322 47 C. F. R. § 90.315.
323 47 C. F. R. Part 22, Subpart I.
324 47 C. F. R. §§ 2.106, footnotes NG127 and 22.603.
58
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
59
below. We reiterate that these exclusions will not prevent WAVDs from operating on channels listed in the table when WAVDs are a sufficient distance from the cities listed below.
Area Excluded Frequencies (MHz) Excluded Channels
Boston, MA ....................................................... 470- 494 14- 17 Chicago, IL........................................................ 470- 488 14- 16

Cleveland, OH (WAVDs may operate until further order from the Commission).................. 470- 494 14- 17
Dallas/ Fort Worth, TX ...................................... 476- 494 15- 17 Detroit, MI (WAVDs may operate until
further order from the Commission).................. 470- 494 14- 17 Hawaii ............................................................... 488- 494 17
Houston, TX...................................................... 482- 500 16- 18 Los Angeles, CA ............................................... 470- 494 & 500- 518 14- 17 & 19- 21
Miami, Fl ........................................................... 470- 482 14- 15 New York/ N. E. New Jersey ............................. 470- 494 14- 17
Philadelphia, PA................................................ 494- 518 18- 21 Pittsburgh, PA ................................................... 470- 482 & 488- 506 14- 15 & 17- 19
San Francisco/ Oakland, CA .............................. 476- 500 15- 18 Washington D. C./ MD/ VA................................. 482- 506 16- 19

155. Finally, as proposed in the Notice, we will exclude WAVDs from operating in the 608- 614 MHz band (TV channel 37) to protect radio astronomy operations in that band. This exclusion is
consistent with the Table of Allocations in Part 2 of our rules, which specifies that no stations will be authorized to transmit in that band. 325 We also note we have recently authorized the use of medical
telemetry in the 608- 614 MHz band, 326 and this exclusion will also protect those operations. Finally, WAVDs will not be allowed to use channels above 698 MHz (channel 51) in the UHF- TV band due to a
recent spectrum reallocation of those channels to uses other than broadcasting. We find that these exclusions are justified to protect existing operations in these bands.

4. Technical and Operational Requirements
156. The Notice proposed conservative technical and operational requirements to allow WAVDs to operate without harming other operations. Specifically, the Notice proposed: (1) to limit the

ERP of WAVDs to 250 milliwatts (mW); (2) to require that the transmitting devices use a permanently attached antenna; (3) to allow WAVDs bandwidths of up to 6 megahertz, limited to transmitting on a

325 47 C. F. R. § 2.106, Note US246.
326 See Amendment of Parts 2 and 95 of the Commission’s Rules to Create a Wireless Medical Telemetry Service,
ET Docket No. 99- 255, Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd 11206 (2000).
59
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
60
single TV channel (i. e., WAVD transmissions may not overlap the TV channel edge); (4) to use the same emission limitations being proposed for other TV BAS transmitters in this proceeding; (5) to authorize
WAVD transmitters under the certification procedures of Part 2 of our rules; (6) to require WAVDs to maintain a 129 km separation distance from TV broadcasting stations operating on the same frequency
and a 200 km separation distance from cities where land mobile operations are authorized; 327 (7) to require WAVD operators to achieve prior notification, rather than coordination, with the local broadcast
coordinator or any adjacent channel TV station within 161 km of each intended WAVD operation at least 10 business days in advance of operation; 328 (8) that WAVD licensees be subject to the station
identification requirements of Section 74.882; and (9) that manufacturers include certain information in the product literature that is included with WAVDs to indicate the requirements for using these devices. 329

157. AMPTP endorses all of the proposed technical and operational requirements proposed with the exception of the requirement that WAVDs use a permanently attached antenna. They contend
that such antennas are fragile and suffer frequent damage. AMPTP therefore recommends that WAVD antennas be removable to facilitate repair and maintenance, as is the case with land mobile radios. 330 SBE
disagrees with AMPTP and maintains that permanently attached antennas can be manufactured sufficiently robust to withstand day- to- day use. SBE asserts that this requirement is an important
safeguard against uninformed parties using external, high gain antennas to illegally boost the WAVD EIRP. 331 AMPTP argues that potential problems from detachable antenna usage should be addressed and
solved through the notification and response procedures with the frequency coordinator. 332
158. MSTV/ NAB requests that WAVDs be required to conduct full frequency coordination through the local frequency coordinator, rather than a notification 10 days in advance of operation. They

also oppose the proposal to allow a non- response from a local frequency coordinator to be considered approval for WAVD operations because they contend that a WAVD operator could simply leave a
message with a coordinator and go forward with operations without any knowledge of the impact those operations would cause to low power BAS operations. 333 AMPTP opposes full frequency coordination.
AMPTP argues that because WAVDs will operate with low EIRP over a limited range on a non-interference basis, 10 days is ample time to address any concerns that existing operators may have.
Further, AMPTP states that the provision allowing WAVDs to operate in the absence of a coordinator response protects their use if a coordinator misplaces or accidentally discards a response. Also, they state

327 In addition, we proposed that WAVDs maintain a 52 km separation from the Gulf of Mexico in the 476- 494
MHz band and from Hawaii in the 488- 494 MHz band. See Notice at ¶ 105.
328 We proposed that such notifications include: the proposed frequency or frequencies, location, maximum antenna
height, type of emission, effective radiated power, intended dates of operation, and licensee contact information. In addition, we stated that the coordinator’s recommendation regarding the operation of a particular WAVD must be

followed by the WAVD licensee. Licensees could appeal to the Commission if they disagree with a coordinator’s recommendation, but would bear the burden of proof in overturning the recommendation.

329 Notice at ¶¶ 100- 109.
330 Id. at 5- 6.
331 SBE Comments at 21.
332 AMPTP Reply Comments at 5.
333 MSTV/ NAB Comments at 13.
60
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
61
that the operating efficiency of producers must be considered as well as potential interference. 334
159. Discussion. The various technical and operational requirement proposals for WAVDs set forth in the Notice were designed to protect other users of the TV bands without unnecessarily hindering

WAVD operations. Most of these were unopposed, and we will adopt them as proposed. Specifically, we adopt the ERP limit of 250 mW, the bandwidth limit of 6 megahertz on a single TV channel, the
requirement to meet the same emissions limitations as other Part 74 transmitters, Part 2 certification procedures for WAVD transmitters, 335 the proposed separation distances from TV and land mobile
stations, 336 the requirement that WAVD licensees follow the station identification requirements of Section 74.882; and the requirement that manufacturers include certain information in their product literature.

160. With respect to the antenna issue raised by commenters, we agree with SBE that the use of unintended antennas should be avoided because they could increase the interference potential. We also
agree with AMPTP that a permanently attached antenna may result in increased repair costs. We believe that a reasonable compromise between these positions exists. We note that our Part 15 rules contain a
provision allowing either permanently attached antennas or devices with unique couplings to permit antennas to be more easily repaired. 337 This has worked well in the preventing unintended antennas from
being attached to low power unlicensed devices and we believe a similar requirement would work here. Accordingly, we are adopting a requirement that WAVDs contain a permanently attached antenna or
contain a unique connector that allows for easy antenna repair while preventing the use of unauthorized antennas.

161. After considering the comments of MSTV/ NAB, we continue to believe that notification is more appropriate than full coordination for WAVDs. We take this position based on the low ERP,
limited range, and non- interference status of WAVDs. In addition, because WAVDs may be used at multiple locations in support of a production, notification will be less burdensome than coordination for
both the WAVD licensee and the coordinator while still providing adequate protection to broadcast transmissions. In this connection, will adopt our proposal to consider the absence of a response from a
coordinator after ten business days have passed as an approval. Once the WAVD operator has made reasonable attempts to notify the BAS coordinator or appropriate TV stations, we find that failure of these
entities to respond to the WAVD operator approval is an insufficient basis to delay use of WAVDs. We find that this approach strikes a reasonable balance between the requirements of producers and the needs
of the coordinator to study notifications and respond to operators as necessary. In response to MSTV/ NAB’s concerns, however, we will require WAVD licensees to notify, for informational purposes
only, nearby co- channel and adjacent channel TV stations (i. e., those stations within 161 km of the
334 AMPTP Reply Comments at 4- 5.
335 We note that no commenter responded to our question regarding whether the declaration of conformity
procedures would be more appropriate for WAVDs than the certification procedures.
336 We will condition licenses to require licensees to comply with the frequency and distance limitations set forth in
new Section 74.870( c), and with the notification procedures set forth in new Section 74.870( g), for each operation. In addition, we note that, given the low 250 mW ERP and secondary status of WAVD operations, international

frequency coordination is not required for operations close to Canadian or Mexican borders. However, such operations are secondary to primary Canadian or Mexican systems as they are to primary domestic systems, and
they must not cause harmful interference to, and must accept interference from, primary Canadian and Mexican systems.

337 See 47 C. F. R. §15.203.
61
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
62
WAVD location). 338 As stated, this will be informational only and television stations will not be able to prevent a WAVD from operating. However, this informational notification may help identify the source
of interference if any is experienced after a WAVD begins operating. We adopt all other aspects of the notification proposal as proposed.

IV. CONCLUSION
162. In making the rule amendments adopted herein, we are updating the Broadcast Auxiliary Service rules in Part 74 and permitting increased compatibility between Broadcast Auxiliary Services, the

Cable Television Relay Service, and Fixed Service Microwave systems operating on shared spectrum. Moreover, licensees and equipment manufacturers will gain greater technical flexibility and more
efficiency in the licensing process by these changes and the broadcast industry will find it easier to transition to digital TV. Additionally, we are permitting wireless assist video devices to operate on
certain VHF and UHF TV spectrum, thereby increasing spectrum efficiency and promoting equipment which will increase safety at production sites as well as lower film and television production costs.

V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
163. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. The Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, required by Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended by the Contract with America

Advancement Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996), is contained in Appendix B.
164. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis. This Report and Order contains modified information collection( s) subject to the PRA of 1995, Public Law 104- 13.

VI. ORDERING CLAUSES
165. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections 1, 4( i), 302, 303( f) and (r), 332, and 337 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C. §§ 1, 4( i), 154( i), 302, 303( f)

and (r), 332, 337, this Report and Order and the rules specified in Appendix A ARE ADOPTED.
166. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the rules specified in Appendix A, except for those specified below, will become effective 30 days after their publication in the Federal Register.

167. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Pursuant to 5 U. S. C. §§ 553( d)( 1) and 553( d)( 3), the rules implementing digital modulation of BAS stations specified in Appendix A,
specifically Sections 74.535 and 74.637 of the Commission’s Rules, 47 C. F. R. §§ 74.535 and 74.637, will become effective as of the adoption date of this Report and Order.

168. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, SHALL SEND a copy of this Report and Order, ET
Docket No. 01- 75, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

338 Under the rules adopted herein, WAVDs must be separated from co- channel TV operations by at least 129 km.
62
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
63
Marlene H. Dortch Secretary
63
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
64
APPENDIX A: FINAL RULES
Parts 1, 2, 73, 74, 78 and 101 of Chapter I of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows:

PART 1 – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: 47 U. S. C. 151, 154, 207, 303, and 309( j).
2. Section 1.901 is revised to read as follows:
§ 1.901 Basis and purpose.
These rules are issued pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U. S. C 151 et seq. The purpose of these rules is to establish the requirements and conditions under which entities may

be licensed in the Wireless Radio Services as described in this part and in parts 13, 20, 22, 24, 26, 27, 74, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97 and 101 of this chapter.

3. Section 1.902 is revised to read as follows:
§ 1.902 Scope.
In case of any conflict between the rules set forth in this subpart and the rules set forth in Parts 13, 20, 22, 24, 26, 27, 74, 80, 87, 90, 95, 97, and 101 of Title 47, Chapter I of the Code of Federal

Regulations, the rules in Part 1 shall govern.
4. Section 1.929 is amended by revising the introductory text of paragraphs (c)( 4) and (d) to read as follows:

§ 1.929 Classification of filings as major or minor.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) In the Private Land Mobile Radio Services (PLMRS), the remote pickup broadcast auxiliary service, and GMRS systems licensed to non- individuals:

* * * * *
(d) In the microwave, aural broadcast auxiliary, and television broadcast auxiliary services:
* * * * *
64
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
65
PART 2 – FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
5. The authority citation for Part 2 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: 47 U. S. C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise noted.
6. Section 2.106, the Table of Frequency Allocations, is amended as follows:
(a) Revise pages 25, 26, 37, 38, and 76.
(b) In the list of United States Footnotes, revise footnote US11 and delete footnote US291.
(c) In the list of Non- Federal Government Footnotes, revise footnotes NG53 and NG115 and add footnote NG175.

The revisions read as follows:
§ 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations.
* * * * *
65
66
50- 123.5875

(VHF)

Page
25

International
Table

United
States
Table

Region
1

Region
2

Region
3

Federal
Government

Non- Federal
Government

FCC
Rule
Part( s)

50- 54 AMATEUR 5.162A
5.166
5.167
5.168
5.170

50- 54 AMATEUR
Amateur
(97)

54- 72 BROADCASTING

See
previous

page
for

47- 68
MHz

54- 68 BROADCASTING Fixed Mobile 5.172

54- 68 FIXED MOBILE BROADCASTING 5.162A

68- 74.8 FIXED MOBILE
except
aeronautical

mobile

68- 72 BROADCASTING Fixed Mobile 5.173
68- 74.8 FIXED MOBILE

NG115
NG128
NG149

Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74)

72- 73 FIXED MOBILE
50- 73
72- 73 FIXED MOBILE NG3
NG49

NG56

Public
Mobile

(22)

Private
Land
Mobile

(90)

Personal
Radio
(95)

73- 74.6 RADIO
ASTRONOMY 5.178

73- 74.6 RADIO
ASTRONOMY

US74

5.149
5.174
5.175
5.177

5.179

74.6- 74.8 FIXED MOBILE
5.149
5.176
5.179

74.6- 74.8 FIXED MOBILE US273

Private
Land
Mobile

(90)

74.8- 75.2 AERONAUTICAL
RADIONAVIGATION 5.180 5.181

74.8- 75.2 AERONAUTICAL
RADIONAVIGATION 5.180

Aviation
(87)

75.2- 87.5 FIXED MOBILE
except
aeronautical

mobile

75.2- 75.4 FIXED MOBILE 5.179

75.2- 75.4 FIXED MOBILE US273
Private
Land
Mobile

(90)
66
67
75.4- 76 FIXED MOBILE
75.4- 87 FIXED MOBILE

75.4- 76 FIXED MOBILE NG3
NG49

NG56

Public
Mobile

(22)

Private
Land
Mobile

(90)

Personal
Radio
(95)

5.182
5.183
5.188

5.175
5.179
5.184
5.187

76- 88 BROADCASTING Fixed Mobile

76- 88 BROADCASTING

87.5- 100 BROADCASTING
5.185

75.4- 88
NG115
NG128
NG129

NG149

Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74)

5.190
88- 100 BROADCASTING
87- 100 FIXED MOBILE BROADCASTING
88- 108

88- 108 BROADCASTING

100- 108 BROADCASTING 5.192
5.194

US93
US93
NG2
NG128

NG129

Broadcast
Radio
(FM)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74)

108- 117.975 AERONAUTICAL
RADIONAVIGATION 5.197

108- 117.975 AERONAUTICAL
RADIONAVIGATION US93

Note:
The
NTIA

Manual

(footnote
G126)
states

that
differential

GPS

stations
may
be

authorized
in
the

108- 117.975
MHz
band,

but
the
FCC

has
not
yet

addressed
this
footnote.

117.975- 121.9375 AERONAUTICAL
MOBILE
(R)

5.111
5.199
5.200
591
US26

US28

121.9375- 123.0875 591 US30
US31
US33
US80

US102
US213

121.9375- 123.0875 AERONAUTICAL
MOBILE
591
US30

US31
US33

US80
US102

US213

117.975- 137 AERONAUTICAL
MOBILE
(R)

123.0875- 123.5875 AERONAUTICAL
MOBILE
5.200
591
US32

US33
US112

Aviation
(87)

5.111
5.198
5.199
5.200
5.201
5.202
5.203
5.203A

5.203B

See
next
page

for
123.5875- 137

MHz

See
next
page

for

123.5875- 137
MHz Page
26
67
68
470- 849

MHz
(UHF)

Page
37

International
Table

United
States
Table

Region
1

Region
2

Region
3

Federal
Government

Non- Federal
Government

FCC
Rule
Part( s)

470- 512 BROADCASTING Fixed Mobile 5.292
5.293

470- 585 FIXED MOBILE BROADCASTING

470- 512 BROADCASTING
NG128
NG149 FIXED NG127 LAND MOBILE
NG66
NG114 NG115

Public
Mobile

(22)

Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74) Private Land Mobile (90)

512- 608 BROADCASTING
5.291
5.298

5.297
585- 610 FIXED MOBILE BROADCASTING RADIONAVIGATION
470- 608
512- 608 BROADCASTING
NG128
NG149 NG115

Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74)

5.149
5.305
5.306
5.307

608- 614 RADIO
ASTRONOMY

US74

LAND
MOBILE

US350

608- 614 RADIO
ASTRONOMY Mobile- satellite except aeronautical mobile- satellite (Earth- to- space)

US246

Personal
(95)

614- 698 BROADCASTING
NG128
NG149 NG115

Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74)

470- 790 BROADCASTING
614- 806 BROADCASTING Fixed Mobile
610- 890 FIXED MOBILE
5.317A BROADCASTING

614- 890

698- 746 BROADCASTING
NG128
FIXED MOBILE NG115
NG159

Wireless Communications
(27)
Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74)
68
69
746- 764 BROADCASTING
NG128
FIXED MOBILE NG115
NG159

Wireless Communications
(27)
Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcast.

(74)

Private
Land
Mobile

(90)

764- 776 FIXED MOBILE NG115
NG128
NG158

NG159

Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74) Private Land Mobile (90)

5.149
5.291A

5.294
5.296

5.300
5.302
5.304
5.306

5.311
5.312

776- 794 BROADCASTING
NG128
FIXED MOBILE

790- 862 FIXED BROADCASTING
NG115
NG159

Wireless Communications
(27)
Broadcast
Radio
(TV)

(73) Auxiliary
Broadcast.

(74)

Private
Land
Mobile

(90)

5.293
5.309
5.311

794- 806 FIXED MOBILE NG115
NG128
NG158

NG159

Auxiliary
Broadcasting (74) Private Land Mobile (90)

806- 821 FIXED LAND
MOBILE NG30 NG31 NG43

NG63
Public
Mobile

(22)

Private
Land
Mobile

(90)

821- 824 LAND
MOBILE NG30 NG43 NG63

Private
Land
Mobile

(90)

824- 849 FIXED LAND
MOBILE NG30 NG43 NG63

NG151
Public
Mobile

(22)

5.312
5.314
5.315

5.316
5.319
5.321

806- 890 FIXED MOBILE5.317A BROADCASTING

See
next
page

for

862- 890
MHz

5.317
5.318

5.149
5.305
5.306
5.307

5.311
5.320

See
next
page

for

849-
894
MHz

See
next
page

for

866-
896
MHz

Page
38
69
70
36- 37 EARTH
EXPLORATION-

SATELLITE
(passive)

FIXED MOBILE SPACE
RESEARCH

(passive)

5.149

36- 37 EARTH
EXPLORATION-

SATELLITE
(passive)

FIXED MOBILE SPACE
RESEARCH

(passive)

US263
US342

37- 37.5 FIXED MOBILE SPACE
RESEARCH

(space-
to-
Earth)

5.547

37- 37.6 FIXED MOBILE
37.5- 38 FIXED FIXED-
SATELLITE

(space- to-
Earth)
5.551AA

MOBILE SPACE RESEARCH
(space-
to-
Earth)

Earth
exploration- satellite

(space- to-
Earth)

5.547

37- 38 FIXED MOBILE SPACE
RESEARCH (space- to- Earth) 38- 38.6 FIXED MOBILE

37.6- 38.6 FIXED FIXED-
SATELLITE (space- to- Earth) MOBILE

Satellite Communications
(25)

38- 39.5 FIXED FIXED-
SATELLITE

(space- to-
Earth)
5.551AA

MOBILE Earth exploration-
satellite
(space- to-

Earth)

5.547

38.6- 39.5
38.6- 39.5 FIXED FIXED-
SATELLITE (space- to- Earth) MOBILE NG175

39.5- 40 FIXED FIXED-
SATELLITE

(space- to-
Earth)
5.551AA

MOBILE MOBILE-
SATELLITE

(space- to-
Earth)

Earth
exploration- satellite

(space- to-
Earth)

5.547

39.5- 40 FIXED-
SATELLITE (space- to- Earth) MOBILE- SATELLITE (space- to- Earth) G117

39.5- 40 FIXED FIXED-
SATELLITE (space- to- Earth) MOBILE NG175 MOBILE- SATELLITE (space- to- Earth)

Fixed
Microwave

(101) Page
76
70
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
71
* * * * *
UNITED STATES (US) FOOTNOTES
* * * * *
US11 The use of the frequencies 166.25 and 170.15 MHz may be authorized to non- Federal Government remote pickup broadcast base and land mobile stations and to non- Federal Government base,

fixed and land mobile stations in the public safety radio services on the condition that harmful interference shall not be caused to present or future Federal Government stations in the band 162- 174
MHz. Authorization on these frequencies shall be in the lower 48 contiguous States only, except within the area bounded on the west by the Mississippi River, on the north by the parallel of latitude 37° 30' N.,
and on the east and south by that arc of the circle with center at Springfield, Illinois, and radius equal to the airline distance between Springfield, Illinois, and Montgomery, Alabama, subtended between the
foregoing west and north boundaries. The use of these frequencies by remote pickup broadcast stations shall not be authorized for locations within 150 miles (241.4 km) of New York City; and use of these
frequencies by the public safety radio services shall not be authorized except for locations within 150 miles of New York City.

* * * * *
NON- FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (NG) FOOTNOTES
* * * * *
NG53 In the band 12.7- 13.15 GHz, television pickup stations and CARS pickup stations shall be assigned channels on a co- equal basis and shall operate on a secondary basis to fixed stations operating in

accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocations. In the band 13.15- 13.20 GHz, television pickup stations and CARS pickup stations shall be assigned channels on a primary co- equal basis within 50
kilometers of the television markets defined in 47 C. F. R § 76.53. In the band 13.20- 13.2125 GHz, television pickup stations shall be assigned channels on a primary basis, and CARS fixed and pickup
stations shall operate on a secondary basis to television broadcast auxiliary stations.
* * * * *
NG115 In the bands 54- 72 MHz, 76- 88 MHz, 174- 216 MHz, 470- 608 MHz, and 614- 806 MHz, wireless microphones and wireless assist video devices may be authorized on a non- interference basis,

subject to the terms and conditions set forth in 47 C. F. R. part 74, subpart H.
* * * * *
NG175 Television pickup stations in the mobile services authorized to use frequencies in the band 38.6- 40.0 GHz on or before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), may

continue to operate on a secondary basis to stations operating in accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocations.

* * * * *
71
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
72
PART 73 – RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
7. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: 47 U. S. C. 154, 303, 3334, and 336.
8. Section 73.3500 is amended by removing the entries for Forms 313 and 313- R from the table in paragraph (a) and adding an entry for Forms 601 and 603 to read as follows:

§ 73.3500 Application and report forms.
(a) * * *

Form number Title
* * * * * * * * * *
601 ............... FCC Application for Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Radio Service Authorization

603 ............... FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Application for Assignments of Authorization and Transfers of Control

* * * * *
9. Section 73.3533 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (a)( 3).
§ 73.3533 Application for construction permit or modification of construction permit.
(a) * * *
(3) [Reserved]
* * * * *
10. Section 73.3536 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (b)( 3).
§ 73.3536 Application for license to cover construction permit.
(b) * * *
(3) [Reserved]
* * * * *
11. Section 73.3598 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 73.3598 Period of construction.
(a) Each original construction permit for the construction of a new TV, AM, FM or International Broadcast; low power TV; TV translator; TV booster; FM translator; or FM booster, or to make changes

in such existing stations, shall specify a period of three years from the date of issuance of the original construction permit within which construction shall be completed and application for license filed.
72
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
73
* * * * *
PART 74 – EXPERIMENTAL RADIO, AUXILIARY, SPECIAL BROADCASTING AND OTHER PROGRAM DISTRIBUTIONAL SERVICES

12. The authority citation for Part 74 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: 47 U. S. C. 154, 303, 307, 336( f), 336( h) and 554.
13. Section 74.5 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (a)( 4) through (a)( 6) as paragraphs (a)( 5) through (a)( 7), adding a new paragraph (a)( 4), and adding a new paragraph (f) to read as follows:

§ 74.5 Cross reference to rules in other parts.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) Subpart F, “Wireless Telecommunications Services Applications and Proceedings”. (§§ 1.901 to 1.981).

* * * * *
(f) Part 101, “Fixed Microwave Services”.
14. A new Section 74.6 is added to read as follows:
§ 74.6 Licensing of broadcast auxiliary and low power auxiliary stations.
Applicants for and licensees of remote pickup broadcast stations, aural broadcast auxiliary stations, television broadcast auxiliary stations, and low power auxiliary stations authorized under

subparts D, E, F, and H of this part are subject to the application and procedural rules for wireless telecommunications services contained in part 1, subpart F of this chapter. Applicants for these stations
may file either manually or electronically as specified in § 1.913( b) and (d) of this chapter.
15. Section 74.15 is amended by revising the second sentence and deleting the last sentence of paragraph (f) to read as follows:

§ 74.15 Station license period.
* * * * *
(f) * * * An application for renewal of license shall be filed in accordance with the provisions of § 1.949.

* * * * *
16. Section 74.24 is amended by revising the introductory text and paragraphs (a), (d), (f), (g), and the last two sentences of paragraph (i), by adding a new sentence to the end of paragraph (h)( 1), and

by removing the Note after paragraph (g) to read as follows:
§ 74.24 Short term operation.
73
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
74
All classes of broadcast auxiliary stations provided for in subparts D, E, F and H of this part, except wireless video assist devices, may be operated on a short- term basis under the authority conveyed
by a Part 73 license or a broadcast auxiliary license without prior authorization from the FCC, subject to the following conditions:

(a) Licensees operating under this provision must be eligible to operate the particular class of broadcast auxiliary station.
* * * * *
(d) Short- term operation under this section shall not exceed 720 hours annually per frequency.
Note: Certain frequencies shared with other services which are normally available for permanent broadcast auxiliary station assignment may not be available for short- term operation. Refer to any note( s) which may be
applicable to the use of a specific frequency prior to initiating operation.
* * * * *
(f) Stations operated pursuant to this section shall be identified by the transmission of the call sign of the associated Part 73 broadcast station or broadcast auxiliary station, or, in the case of stations

operated by broadcast network and cable network entities, by the network or cable entity’s name and base of operations city.

(g) Prior to operating pursuant to the provisions of this section, licensees shall, for the intended location or area- of- operation, notify the appropriate frequency coordination committee or any licensee( s)
assigned the use of the proposed operating frequency, concerning the particulars of the intended operation and shall provide the name and telephone number of a person who may be contacted in the event of
interference. Except as provided below, this notification provision shall not apply where an unanticipated need for immediate short- term mobile station operation would render compliance with the provisions of
this paragraph impractical.
(1) A CARS licensee shall always be given advance notification prior to the commencement of short- term operation on or adjacent to an assigned frequency.

(2) The Commission may designate a frequency coordinator as the single point of contact under this section for advance coordination of major national and international events. Once designated, all
short- term auxiliary broadcast use under this section must be coordinated in advance through the designated coordinator.

(i) Coordinators under this provision will not be designated unless the Commission receives an initial request, in writing, to designate a coordinator.
(ii) The Commission will issue a Public Notice with information regarding the designation of such a coordinator.
(iii) All coordination must be done on a non- discriminatory basis.
(iv) All licensees must abide by the decision of the coordinator. The Commission will be the final arbiter of any disputes.
74
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
75
(3) An unanticipated need will never be deemed to exist for a scheduled event, such as a convention, sporting event, etc.
(h) * * *
(1) * * * See § 1.928( e) of this chapter for a definition of Line A and Line C.
* * * * *
(i) * * * It shall simply be necessary for the licensee to contact the potentially affected agency and obtain advance approval for the proposed short- term operation. Where protection to FCC monitoring

stations is concerned, approval for short- term operation may be given by the District Director of a Commission field facility.

* * * * *
17. A new Section 74.25 is added to read as follows:
§ 74.25 Temporary conditional operating authority.
An applicant for a new broadcast auxiliary radio service station or a modification of an existing station under subparts D, E, F, or H of this part may operate the proposed station during the pendency of

its applications upon the filing of a properly completed formal application that complies with the rules for the particular class of station, provided that the conditions set forth below are satisfied.

(a) Conditions applicable to all broadcast auxiliary stations.
(i) Stations operated pursuant to this section shall be identified by the transmission of the call sign of the associated Part 73 broadcast station, if one exists, or the prefix “WT” followed by the

applicant’s local business telephone number for broadcast or cable network entities.
(ii) The antenna structure( s) has been previously studied by the Federal Aviation Administration and determined to pose no hazard to aviation safety as required by subpart B of part 17 of this chapter; or

the antenna or tower structure does not exceed 6.1 meters above ground level or above an existing man- made structure (other than an antenna structure), if the antenna or tower has not been previously
studied by the Federal Aviation Administration and cleared by the FCC;
(iii) The grant of the application( s) does not require a waiver of the Commission's rules;
(iv) The applicant has determined that the facility( ies) will not significantly affect the environment as defined in § 1.1307 of this chapter;

(v) The station site does not lie, within a radio “Quiet Zone” identified in § 1.924 of this chapter.
(b) Conditions applicable to remote pickup broadcast auxiliary stations.
(i) The auxiliary station must be located within 80 km (50 mi) of the broadcast studio or broadcast transmitter.

(ii) The applicant must coordinate the operation with all affected co- channel and adjacent channel licensees in the area of operation. This requirement can be satisfied by coordination with the
local frequency committee if one exists.
75
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
76
(iii) Operation under this provision is not permitted between 152.87 MHz and 153.35 MHz.
(c) Conditions applicable to aural and television broadcast auxiliary stations.
(i) The applicable frequency coordination procedures have been successfully completed and the filed application is consistent with that coordination.

(ii) The station site does not lie within an area requiring international coordination.
(iii) If operated on frequencies in the 17.8- 19.7 GHz band, the station site does not lie within any of the areas identified in § 1.924 of this chapter.

(d) Operation under this section shall be suspended immediately upon notification from the Commission or by the District Director of a Commission field facility, and shall not be resumed until
specific authority is given by the Commission or District Director. When authorized by the District Director, short test operations may be made.

(e) Conditional authority ceases immediately if the application( s) is returned by the Commission because it is not acceptable for filing.
(f) Conditional authorization does not prejudice any action the Commission may take on the subject application( s). Conditional authority is accepted with the express understanding that such
authority may be modified or cancelled by the Commission at any time without hearing if, in the Commission's discretion, the need for such action arises. An applicant operating pursuant to this
conditional authority assumes all risks associated with such operation, the termination or modification of the conditional authority, or the subsequent dismissal or denial of its application( s).

18. A new Section 74.34 is added to read as follows:
§ 74.34 Period of construction; certification of completion of construction.
(a) Each aural and television broadcast auxiliary station authorized under subparts E and F of this part must be in operation within 18 months from the initial date of grant.

(b) Each remote pickup broadcast auxiliary station authorized under subpart D of this part must be in operation within 12 months from the initial date of grant.
(c) Failure to timely begin operation means the authorization terminates automatically.
(d) Requests for extension of time may be granted upon a showing of good cause pursuant to § 1.946( e) of this chapter.

(e) Construction of any authorized facility or frequency must be completed by the date specified in the license and the Commission must be notified pursuant to § 1.946 of this chapter.
19. Section 74.402 is revised to read as follows:
§ 74.402 Frequency assignment.
Operation on all channels listed in this section (except: frequencies 26.07 MHz, 26.11 MHz, and 26.45 MHz, and frequencies listed in paragraphs (a)( 4) and (c)( 1) of this section) shall be in accordance

with the “priority of use” provisions in § 74.403( b). The channel will be assigned by its center frequency,
76
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
77
channel bandwidth, and emission designator. In general, the frequencies listed in this section represent the center of the channel or channel segment. When an even number of channels are stacked in those
sections stacking is permitted, channel assignments may be made for the frequency halfway between those listed.

(a) The following channels (except 1606, 1622, and 1646 kHz) may be assigned for use by broadcast remote pickup stations using any emission (other than single sideband or pulse) that will be in
accordance with the provisions of § 74.462.
(1) MF Channels: 1606, 1622, and 1646 kHz. The channel 1606 kHz is subject to the condition listed in paragraph (e)( 1) of this section.

(2) HF Channels: 25.87, 25.91, 25.95, 25.99, 26.03, 26.07, 26.09, 26.11, 26.13, 26.15, 26.17, 26.19, 26.21, 26.23, 26.25, 26.27, 26.29, 26.31, 26.33, 26.35, 26.37, 26.39, 26.41, 26.43, 26.45, and
26.47 MHz. The channels 25.87- 26.09 MHz are subject to the condition listed in paragraph (e)( 2) of this section.

(3) VHF Channels: 166.25 and 170.15 MHz. These channels are subject to the condition listed in paragraph (e)( 8) of this section.
(4) UHF Channels: Up to two of the following 6.25 kHz segments may be stacked to form a channel which may be assigned for use by broadcast remote pickup stations using any emission contained
within the resultant channel in accordance with the provisions of § 74.462: 450.00625 MHz, 450.0125 MHz, 450.01875 MHz, 450.025 MHz, 450.98125 MHz, 450.9875 MHz, 450.99375 MHz, 455.00625
MHz, 455.0125 MHz, 455.01875 MHz, 455.025 MHz, 455.98125 MHz, 455.9875 MHz, and 455.99375 MHz. These channels are subject to the condition listed in paragraph (e)( 9) of this section.

(b) Up to four of the following 7.5 kHz VHF segments and up to eight of the following 6.25 kHz UHF segments may be stacked to form a channel which may be assigned for use by broadcast remote
pickup stations using any emission contained within the resultant channel in accordance with the provisions of § 74.462.

(1) VHF segments: 152.8625, 152.870, 152.8775, 152.885, 152.8925, 152.900, 152.9075, 152.915, 152.9225, 152.930, 152.9375, 152.945, 152.9525, 152.960, 152.9675, 152.975, 152.9825,
152.990, 152.9975, 153.005, 153.0125, 153.020, 153.0275, 153.035, 153.0425, 153.050, 153.0575, 153.065, 153.0725, 153.080, 153.0875, 153.095, 153.1025, 153.110, 153.1175, 153.125, 153.1325,
153.140, 153.1475, 153.155, 153.1625, 153.170, 153.1775, 153.185, 153.1925, 153.200, 153.2075, 153.215, 153.2225, 153.230, 153.2375, 153.245, 153.2525, 153.260, 153.2675, 153.275, 153.2825,
153.290, 153.2975, 153.305, 153.3125, 153.320, 153.3275, 153.335, 153.3425, 153.350, and 153.3575. These channels are subject to the conditions listed in paragraphs (e) (3), (4), (5), and (10) of this section.

(2) VHF segments: 160.860, 160.8675, 160.875, 160.8825, 160.890, 160.8975, 160.905, 160.9125, 160.920, 160.9275, 160.935, 160.9425, 160.950, 160.9575, 160.965, 160.9725, 160.980,
160.9875, 160.995, 161.0025, 161.010, 161.0175, 161.025, 161.0325, 161.040, 161.0475, 161.055, 161.0625, 161.070, 161.0775, 161.085, 161.0925, 161.100, 161.1075, 161.115, 161.1225, 161.130,
161.1375, 161.145, 161.1525, 161.160, 161.1675, 161.175, 161.1825, 161.190, 161.1975, 161.205, 161.2125, 161.220, 161.2275, 161.235, 161.2425, 161.250, 161.2575, 161.265, 161.2725, 161.280,
161.2875, 161.295, 161.3025, 161.310, 161.3175, 161.325, 161.3325, 161.340, 161.3475, 161.355, 161.3625, 161.370, 161.3775, 161.385, 161.3925, 161.400. These channels are subject to the condition
listed in paragraph (e)( 6) and (10) of this section.
77
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
78
(3) VHF segments: 161.625, 161.6325, 161.640, 161.6475, 161.655, 161.6625, 161.670, 161.6775, 161.685, 161.6925, 161.700, 161.7075, 161.715, 161.7225, 161.730, 161.7375, 161.745,
161.7525, 161.760, 161.7675, 161.775. These channels are subject to the conditions listed in paragraphs (e)( 4), (7), and (10) of this section.

(4) UHF segments: 450.03125, 450.0375, 450.04375, 450.050, 450.05625, 450.0625, 450.06875, 450.075, 450.08125, 450.0875, 450.09375, 450.100, 450.10625, 450.1125, 450.11875, 450.125,
450.13125, 450.1375, 450.14375, 450.150, 450.15625, 450.1625, 450.16875, 450.175, 450.18125, 450.1875, 450.19375, 450.200, 450.20625, 450.2125, 450.21875, 450.225, 450.23125, 450.2375,
450.24375, 450.250, 450.25625, 450.2625, 450.26875, 450.275, 450.28125, 450.2875, 450.29375, 450.300, 450.30625, 450.3125, 450.31875, 450.325, 450.33125, 450.3375, 450.34375, 450.350,
450.35625, 450.3625, 450.36875, 450.375, 450.38125, 450.3875, 450.39375, 450.400, 450.40625, 450.4125, 450.41875, 450.425, 450.43125, 450.4375, 450.44375, 450.450, 450.45625, 450.4625,
450.46875, 450.475, 450.48125, 450.4875, 450.49375, 450.500, 450.50625, 450.5125, 450.51875, 450.525, 450.53125, 450.5375, 450.54375, 450.550, 450.55625, 450.5625, 450.56875, 450.575,
450.58125, 450.5875, 450.59375, 450.600, 450.60625, 450.6125, 450.61875, 455.03125, 455.0375, 455.04375, 455.050, 455.05625, 455.0625, 455.06875, 455.075, 455.08125, 455.0875, 455.09375,
455.100, 455.10625, 455.1125, 455.11875, 455.125, 455.13125, 455.1375, 455.14375, 455.150, 455.15625, 455.1625, 455.16875, 455.175, 455.18125, 455.1875, 455.19375, 455.200, 455.20625,
455.2125, 455.21875, 455.225, 455.23125, 455.2375, 455.24375, 455.250, 455.25625, 455.2625, 455.26875, 455.275, 455.28125, 455.2875, 455.29375, 455.300, 455.30625, 455.3125, 455.31875,
455.325, 455.33125, 455.3375, 455.34375, 455.350, 455.35625, 455.3625, 455.36875, 455.375, 455.38125, 455.3875, 455.39375, 455.400, 455.40625, 455.4125, 455.41875, 455.425, 455.43125,
455.4375, 455.44375, 455.450, 455.45625, 455.4625, 455.46875, 455.475, 455.48125, 455.4875, 455.49375, 455.500, 455.50625, 455.5125, 455.51875, 455.525, 455.53125, 455.5375, 455.54375,
455.550, 455.55625, 455.5625, 455.56875, 455.575, 455.58125, 455.5875, 455.59375, 455.600, 455.60625, 455.6125, 455.61875.

(c) Up to two of the following 25 kHz segments may be stacked to form a channel which may be assigned for use by broadcast remote pickup stations using any emission contained within the resultant
channel in accordance with the provisions of § 74.462. Users committed to 50 kHz bandwidths and transmitting program material will have primary use of these channels.

(1) UHF segments: 450.6375, 450.6625, 450.6875, 450.7125, 450.7375, 450.7625, 450.7875, 450.8125, 450.8375, 450.8625, 455.6375, 455.6625, 455.6875, 455.7125, 455.7375, 455.7625, 455.7875,
455.8125, 455.8375, 455.8625 MHz.
(2) [Reserved]
(d) Up to two of the following 50 kHz segments may be stacked to form a channel which may be assigned for use by broadcast remote pickup stations using any emission contained within the resultant

channel in accordance with the provisions of § 74.462. Users committed to 100 kHz bandwidths and transmitting program material will have primary use of these channels.

(1) UHF segments: 450.900, 450.950, 455.900, and 455.950 MHz.
(2) [Reserved]
(e) Conditions on Broadcast Remote Pickup Service channel usage as referred to in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section:
78
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
79
(1) Operation is subject to the condition that no harmful interference is caused to the reception of AM broadcast stations.
(2) Operation is subject to the condition that no harmful interference is caused to stations in the broadcast service.
(3) Operation is subject to the condition that no harmful interference is caused to stations operating in accordance with the Table of Frequency Allocations set forth in Part 2 of the Commission's
Rules and Regulations. Applications for licenses to use frequencies in this band must include statements showing what procedures will be taken to ensure that interference will not be caused to stations in the
Industrial/ Business Pool (Part 90).
(4) These frequencies will not be licensed to network entities.
(5) These frequencies will not be authorized to new stations for use on board aircraft.
(6) These frequencies are allocated for assignment to broadcast remote pickup stations in Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands only.

Note: These frequencies are shared with Public Safety and Industrial/ Business Pools (Part 90).
(7) These frequencies may not be used by broadcast remote pickup stations in Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands. In other areas, certain existing stations in the Public Safety and Industrial/ Business Pools

(Part 90) have been permitted to continue operation on these frequencies on the condition that no harmful interference is caused to broadcast remote pickup stations.

(8) Operation on frequencies 166.25 MHz and 170.15 MHz is subject to the condition that harmful interference shall not be caused to present or future Government stations in the band 162- 174
MHz and is also subject to the bandwidth and tolerance limitations and compliance deadlines listed in § 74.462 of this part. Authorization on these frequencies shall be in the lower 48 contiguous States only,
except within the area bounded on the west by the Mississippi River, on the north by the parallel of latitude 37° 30' N., and on the east and south by that arc of the circle with center at Springfield, Illinois,
and radius equal to the airline distance between Springfield, Illinois, and Montgomery, Alabama, subtended between the foregoing west and north boundaries, or within 150 miles (241.4 km) of New
York City.
(9) The use of these frequencies is limited to operational communications, including tones for signaling and for remote control and automatic transmission system control and telemetry. Stations

licensed or applied for before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), must comply with the channel plan by (insert date three years after publication in the Federal Register), or
may continue to operate on a secondary, non- interference basis.
(10) Stations licensed or applied for before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), must comply with the channel plan by (insert date three years after publication in

the Federal Register), or may continue to operate on a secondary, non- interference basis.
(f) License applicants shall request assignment of only those channels, both in number and bandwidth, necessary for satisfactory operation and for which the system is equipped to operate.

However, it is not necessary that each transmitter within a system be equipped to operate on all frequencies authorized to that licensee.
79
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
80
(g) Remote pickup stations or systems will not be granted exclusive channel assignments. The same channel or channels may be assigned to other licensees in the same area. When such sharing is
necessary, the provisions of § 74.403 shall apply.
20. Section 74.403 is amended by revising the first sentence of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 74.403 Frequency selection to avoid interference.
* * * * *
(b) The following order of priority of transmissions shall be observed on all frequencies except frequencies 26.07 MHz, 26.11 MHz, and 26.45 MHz, and frequencies listed in § 74.402( a)( 4) and

(c)( 1) of this part:
* * * * *
21. Section 74.431 is amended by revising the first sentence of paragraph (i) and removing and reserving paragraph (g) to read as follows:

§ 74.431 Special rules applicable to remote pickup stations.
* * * * *
(g) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(i) Remote pickup mobile or base stations may be used for activities associated with the Emergency Alert System (EAS) and similar emergency survival communications systems. * * *

22. Section 74.432 is amended revising paragraphs (b) and (g) and the first sentence of paragraph (k) to read as follows:
§ 74.432 Licensing requirements and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) Base stations may operate as automatic relay stations on the frequencies listed in § 74.402( b)( 4) and (c)( 1) of this part under the provisions of § 74.436, however, one licensee may not

operate such stations on more than two frequency pairs in a single area.
* * * * *
(g) An application for a remote pickup broadcast station or system shall specify the broadcasting station with which the remote pickup broadcast facility is to be principally used and the licensed area of

operation for a system which includes mobile stations shall be the area considered to be served by the associated broadcasting station. Mobile stations may be operated outside the licensed area of operation
pursuant to § 74.24 of this part. Where the applicant for remote pickup broadcast facilities is the licensee of more than one class of broadcasting station (AM, FM, TV), all licensed to the same community,
designation of one such station as the associated broadcasting station will not preclude use of the remote pickup broadcast facilities with those broadcasting stations not included in the designation and such
additional use shall be at the discretion of the licensee.
80
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
81
* * * * *
(k) In case of permanent discontinuance of operations of a station licensed under this subpart, the licensee shall cancel the station license using FCC Form 601. * * *

23. Section 74.433 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 74.433 Temporary authorizations.
* * * * *
(b) A request for special temporary authority for the operation of a remote pickup broadcast station must be made in accordance with the procedures of § 1.931( b) of this chapter.

(c) All requests for special temporary authority of a remote pickup broadcast station must include full particulars including: licensee's name and address, facility identification number of the associated
broadcast station or stations, call letters of remote pickup station (if assigned), type and manufacturer of equipment, power output, emission, frequency or frequencies proposed to be used, commencement and
termination date, location of operation and purpose for which request is made including any particular justification.

* * * * *
24. Section 74.451 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 74.451 Certification of equipment.
(a) Applications for new remote pickup broadcast stations or systems or for changing transmitting equipment of an existing station will not be accepted unless the transmitters to be used have

been certificated by the FCC pursuant to the provisions of this subpart, or have been certificated for licensing under Part 90 of the FCC rules and do not exceed the output power limits specified in
§ 74.461( b).
* * * * *
25. Section 74.452 is revised to read as follows:
§ 74.452 Equipment changes.
(a) Modifications may be made to an existing authorization in accordance with §§ 1.929 and 1.947 of this chapter.

(b) All transmitters initially installed after November 30, 1977, must be certificated for use in this service or other service as specified in § 74.451( a).
26. Section 74.462 is amended by revising paragraph (a), the table in paragraph (b), and the introduction to paragraph (c), and removing paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) to read as follows:
§ 74.462 Authorized bandwidth and emissions.
(a) Each authorization for a new remote pickup broadcast station or system shall require the use of certificated equipment and such equipment shall be operated in accordance with emission
81
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
82
specifications included in the grant of certification and as prescribed in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section.
(b) * * *
Frequencies Authorized bandwidth (kHz) Maximum frequency deviation 1
(kHz)
Type of emission 2

kHz 1606, 1622, and 1646 ................. 10 N/ A A3E

MHz 25.87 to 26.03............................. 40 10
26.07 to 26.47............................. 20 5 152.8625 to 153.3575 3 ............... 30/ 60 5/ 10 Frequencies 25.87 to 153.3575 MHz: A3E, F1E, F3E, F9E
160.860 to 161.400..................... 60 10 161.625 to 161.775..................... 30 5
166.25 and 170.15 4 .................... 12.5/ 25 5 450.00625 to 450.025
450.98125 to 450.99375 455.00625 to 455.025
455.98125 to 455.99375............. Up to 12.5 1.5 450.03125 to 450.61875
455.03125 to 455.61875............. Up to 25 5 450.6375 to 450.8625
455.6375 to 455.8625................. 25 - 50 10 450.900, 450.950
455.900, 455.950 ........................ 50 - 100 35

Frequencies 160.860 to 455.950 MHz:
A1A, A1B, A1D, A1E, A2A, A2B, A2D, A2E, A3E,

F1A, F1B, F1D, F1E, F2A, F2B, F2D, F2E, F3E, F9E

1 Applies where F1A, F1B, F1D, F1E, F2A, F2B, F2D, F2E, F3E, or F9E emissions are used.
2 Stations operating above 450 MHz shall show a need for employing A1A, A1B, A1D, A1E,

A2A, A2B, A2D, A2E, F1A, F1B, F1D, F1E, F2A, F2B, F2D, or F2E emission. 3 New or modified licenses for use of the frequencies will not be granted to utilize transmitters on

board aircraft, or to use a bandwidth in excess of 30 kHz and maximum deviation exceeding 5 kHz 4 For stations licensed or applied for before (insert date 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register), the sum of the bandwidth of emission and tolerance on frequencies 166.25 MHz or 170.15 MHz shall not exceed 25 kHz, and such operation may continue until January 1, 2005. For new
stations licensed or applied for on or after (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), the sum of the bandwidth of emission and tolerance on these frequencies shall not exceed 12.5
kHz. For all remote pickup broadcast stations, the sum of the bandwidth of emission and tolerance on these frequencies shall not exceed 12.5 kHz on or after January 1, 2005.

* * * * *
(c) For emissions on frequencies above 25 MHz with authorized bandwidths up to 30 kHz, the emissions shall comply with the emission mask and transient frequency behavior requirements of §§

90.210 and 90.214 of this chapter. For all other emissions, the mean power of emissions shall be attenuated below the mean output power of the transmitter in accordance with the following schedule:
82
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
83
* * * * *
27. Section 74.464 is amended by revising the introductory text to the table to read as follows:
§ 74.464 Frequency tolerance.
For operations on frequencies above 25 MHz using authorized bandwidths up to 30 kHz, the licensee of a remote pickup broadcast station or system shall maintain the operating frequency of each

station in compliance with the frequency tolerance requirements of § 90.213 of this chapter. For all other operations, the licensee of a remote pickup broadcast station or system shall maintain the operating
frequency of each station in accordance with the following:
* * * * *
28. Section 74.482 is amended by revising the second sentence of paragraph (a) and paragraph (e) to read as follows:

§ 74.482 Station identification.
(a) * * * For systems, the licensee (including those operating pursuant to § 74.24 of this part) shall assign a unit designator to each station in the system. * * *

* * * * *
(e) For stations using F1E or G1E emissions, identification shall be transmitted in the unscrambled analog (F3E) mode or in International Morse Code pursuant to the provisions of paragraph

(d) of this section at intervals not to exceed 15 minutes. For purposes of rule enforcement, all licensees using F1E or G1E emissions shall provide, upon request by the Commission, a full and complete
description of the encoding methodology they currently use.
* * * * *
29. Section 74.502 is amended by removing the second sentence of the introductory text of paragraph (b), revising the last sentence of the introductory text of paragraph (b), adding two new

sentences to the end of the introductory text of paragraph (b), revising paragraph (c)( 1)( ii), and revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:

§ 74.502 Frequency assignment.
(a) * * * * *
(b) * * * The frequencies listed below are the centers of individual segments. When stacking an even number of segments, the center frequency specified will deviate from the list below in that it should

correspond to the actual center of stacked channels. When stacking an odd number of channels, the center frequency specified will correspond to one of the frequencies listed below.

* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
83
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
84
(ii) Licensees may use either a two- way link or one frequency of a frequency pair for a one- way link.
* * * * *
(d) For the coordination of all frequency assignments for fixed stations above 944 MHz, for each frequency authorized under this part, the interference protection criteria in § 101.105( a), (b), and (c)

of this chapter and the frequency usage coordination procedures of § 101.103( d) of this chapter will apply.

* * * * *
30. Section 74.532 is amended by removing the Note following paragraph (d) and revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:

§ 74.532 Licensing requirements.
* * * * *
(f) In case of permanent discontinuance of operations of a station licensed under this subpart, the licensee shall cancel the station license using FCC Form 601. For purposes of this section, a station

which is not operated for a period of one year is considered to have been permanently discontinued.
31. Section 74.534 is revised to read as follows:
§ 74.534 Power limitations.
(a) Transmitter output power.
(1) Transmitter output power shall be limited to that necessary to accomplish the function of the system.

(2) In the 17,700 to 19,700 MHz band, transmitter output power shall not exceed 10 watts.
(b) In no event shall the average equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP), as referenced to an isotropic radiator, exceed the values specified below. In cases of harmful interference, the

Commission may, after notice and opportunity for hearing, order a change in the equivalent isotropically radiated power of this station.

Frequency Band (MHz) Maximum Allowable 1 EIRP (dBW)
944 to 952........................ +40 17,700 to 18,600.............. +55
18,600 to 19,700.............. +35 1
Stations licensed based on an application filed before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), for EIRP values exceeding those specified above, may

continue to operate indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic renewal.
84
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
85
(c) The EIRP of transmitters that use Automatic Transmitter Power Control (ATPC) shall not exceed the EIRP specified on the station authorization. The EIRP of non- ATPC transmitters shall be
maintained as near as practicable to the EIRP specified on the station authorization.
32. Section 74.535 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (d), removing existing paragraphs (e) and (f), and redesignating paragraph (g) as paragraph (e) to read as follows:

§ 74.535 Emission and bandwidth.
(a) The mean power of emissions shall be attenuated below the mean transmitter power (PMEAN) in accordance with the following schedule:

(1) When using frequency modulation:
(i) On any frequency removed from the assigned (center) frequency by more than 50% up to and including 100% of the authorized bandwidth: At least 25 dB in any 100 kHz reference bandwidth (BREF);

(ii) On any frequency removed from the assigned (center) frequency by more than 100% up to and including 250% of the authorized bandwidth: At least 35 dB in any 100 kHz reference bandwidth;
(iii) On any frequency removed from the assigned (center) frequency by more than 250% of the authorized bandwidth: At least 43+ 10 log10 (PMEAN in watts) dB, or 80 dB, whichever is the lesser
attenuation, in any 100 kHz reference bandwidth.
(2) When using transmissions employing digital modulation techniques:
(i) For operating frequencies below 15 GHz, in any 4 kHz reference bandwidth (BREF), the center frequency of which is removed from the assigned frequency by more than 50 percent up to and including

250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: As specified by the following equation but in no event less than 50 decibels:

A = 35 + 0.8( G - 50) + 10 Log10 B. (Attenuation greater than 80 decibels is not required.)
where:
A = Attenuation (in decibels) below the mean output power level. G = Percent removed from the carrier frequency.

B = Authorized bandwidth in megahertz.
(ii) For operating frequencies above 15 GHz, in any 1 MHz reference bandwidth (BREF), the center frequency of which is removed from the assigned frequency by more than 50 percent up to and

including 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: As specified by the following equation but in no event less than 11 decibels:

A = 11 + 0.4( G - 50) + 10 Log10 B. (Attenuation greater than 56 decibels is not required.)
(iii) In any 4 kHz reference bandwidth (BREF), the center frequency of which is removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 43 +10 Log10 (PMEAN
in watts) decibels, or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation.
85
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
86
(b) For all emissions not covered in paragraph (a) of this section, the peak power of emissions shall be attenuated below the peak envelope transmitter power (PPEAK) in accordance with the following
schedule:
(1) On any frequency 500 Hz inside the channel edge up to and including 2500 Hz outside the same edge, the following formula will apply:

A = 29 Log10 [( 25/ 11)[( D + 2.5 – (W/ 2)] 2 ] dB (Attenuation greater than 50 decibels is not required.)
Where:
A = Attenuation (in dB) below the peak envelope transmitter power. D = the displacement frequency (kHz) from the center of the authorized bandwidth.

W = the channel bandwidth (kHz).
(2) On any frequency removed from the channel edge by more than 2500 Hz: At least 43+ 10 Log10 (PPEAK in watts) dB.

* * * * *
(d) For purposes of compliance with the emission limitation requirements of this section:
(1) If the transmitter modulates a single carrier, digital modulation techniques are considered as being employed when digital modulation occupies 50 percent or more of the total peak frequency

deviation of a transmitted radio frequency carrier. The total peak frequency deviation will be determined by adding the deviation produced by the digital modulation signal and the deviation produced by any
frequency division multiplex (FDM) modulation used. The deviation (D) produced by the FDM signal must be determined in accordance with § 2.202( f) of this chapter.

(2) If the transmitter modulates two or more carriers, with at least one using digital modulation and one using frequency or other analog modulation, digital modulation techniques are considered as
being employed when the necessary bandwidth of the digital signal( s) is 50 percent or more of the aggregate bandwidth of the system, comprising the digital necessary bandwidth( s), the analog necessary
bandwidth( s), and any bandwidth( s) between the digital and analog necessary bandwidths. In this case, the aggregate bandwidth shall be used for the authorized bandwidth (B) in paragraph (a) of this section,
and for purposes of compliance with the bandwidth limitations in § 74.502 of this subpart; and the sum of the powers of the analog and digital signals shall be used for mean transmitter power (PMEAN) in
paragraph (a) or the peak envelope transmitter power (PPEAK) in paragraph (b) of this section, and for purposes of compliance with the power limitations in § 74.534 of this subpart.

(3) For demonstrating compliance with the attenuation requirements for frequency modulation and digital modulation in paragraph (a) of this section, the resolution bandwidth (BRES) of the measuring
equipment used for measurements removed from the center frequency by more than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth shall be 100 kHz for operating frequencies below 1 GHz, and 1 MHz for operating
frequencies above 1 GHz. The resolution bandwidth for frequencies removed from the center frequency by less than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth shall be the reference bandwidth (BREF) specified in
the individual emission limitations, but may be reduced to not less than one percent of the authorized bandwidth (B), adjusted upward to the nearest greater resolution bandwidth available on the measuring
equipment. In all cases, if BRES and BREF are not equal, then the attenuation requirement must be increased (or decreased) as determined by a factor of 10 log10 [( BREF in megahertz)/( BRES in megahertz)]
86
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
87
decibels, where a positive factor indicates an increase in the attenuation requirement and a negative factor indicates a decrease in the attenuation requirement.
(4) Stations licensed pursuant to an application filed before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register), using equipment not conforming with the emission limitations
specified above, may continue to operate indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic renewal. Existing equipment and equipment of product lines in
production before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), authorized via certification or verification before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register), for
equipment not conforming to the emission limitations requirements specified above, may continue to be manufactured and/ or marketed, but may not be authorized for use under a station license except at stations
licensed pursuant to an application filed before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register). Any non- conforming equipment authorized under a station license, and replaced on or after
(insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register), must be replaced by conforming equipment.

* * * * *
33. Section 74.536 is amended by removing the line for 31.0 to 31.3 and footnotes 2 and 3 from the table in paragraph (c).

34. Section 74.537 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 74.537 Temporary authorizations.
* * * * *
(b) A request for special temporary authority for the operation of an aural broadcast STL or an intercity relay station must be made in accordance with the procedures of § 1.931( b) of this chapter.

(c) All requests for special temporary authority of an aural broadcast auxiliary stations must include full particulars including: licensee's name and address, facility identification number of the
associated broadcast station( s), call letters of the aural broadcast STL or intercity relay station, if assigned, type and manufacturer of equipment, effective isotropic radiated power, emission, frequency or
frequencies proposed for use, commencement and termination date and location of the proposed operation, and purpose for which request is made including any particular justification.

* * * * *
35. Section 74.551 is amended by revising paragraph (a), removing paragraphs (b) and (c), and redesignating paragraph (d) as new paragraph (b) to read as follows:

§ 74.551 Equipment changes.
(a) Modifications may be made to an existing authorization in accordance with §§ 1.929 and 1.947 of this chapter.

* * * * *
36. Section 74.561 is amended by removing the line for 31,000 to 31,300 from the table.
87
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
88
37. Section 74.602 is amended by removing the third sentence and revising the second to last sentence of the introductory text of paragraph (a); revising the channel boundaries for channel designation
B03 to show 12.7625- 12.7875 in the table of paragraph (a); revising footnote 2 to the table of paragraph (a); revising paragraph (d), the first sentence of paragraph (f), paragraph (h), and the second to last
sentence of the introductory text of paragraph (i); and removing and reserving paragraph (a)( 2), to read as follows:

§ 74.602 Frequency assignment.
(a) * * * The band segment 6425- 6525 MHz is available for broadcast auxiliary stations as described in paragraph (i) of this section. * * *

Band D 1 GHz
Group A channels Group B channels Band A MHz Band B MHz

Designation Channel boundaries Designation Channel boundaries
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * B03 ................. 12.7625- 12.7875
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 For fixed stations using Band D Channels, applicants are encouraged to use alternate A and B
channels such that adjacent R. F. carriers are spaced 12.5 MHz. As an example, a fixed station, relaying several channels, would use A01, B01, A02, B02, A03, etc.

2 The band 13.15 - 13.20 GHz is reserved for the assignment of CARS Pickup and Television
Pickup stations on a primary co- equal basis within 50 kilometers of the television markets defined in § 76.53 of this chapter. The band 13.20 - 13.2125 GHz is reserved exclusively for the assignment of

Television Pickup stations on a primary basis. Fixed stations licensed prior to (insert date 30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) may continue operation under their current status on
channels in the 13.15 - 13.2125 GHz band, subject to periodic license renewals.
(1) * * *
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(d) Cable Television Relay Service stations may be assigned channels in Band D between 12,700 and 13,200 MHz subject to the condition that no harmful interference is caused to TV STL and TV relay

stations authorized at the time of such grants. Similarly, new TV STL and TV relay stations must not cause harmful interference to cable television relay stations authorized at the time of such grants. The
use of channels between 12,700 and 13,200 MHz by TV pickup stations is subject to the condition that no harmful interference is caused to Cable Television Relay Service stations, TV STL and TV relay stations,
except as provided for in § 74.602( a) Note 2. Band D channels are also shared with certain Private Operational Fixed Stations, see § 74.638.

* * * * *
88
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
89
(f) TV auxiliary stations licensed to low power TV stations and translator relay stations will be assigned on a secondary basis, i. e., subject to the condition that no harmful interference is caused to other
TV auxiliary stations assigned to TV broadcast stations, or to cable television relay service stations (CARS) operating between 12,700 and 13,200 MHz. * * *

(g) * * * * *
(h) TV STL, TV relay stations, and TV translator relay stations may be authorized to operate fixed point- to- point service on the UHF TV channels 14- 69 on a secondary basis and subject to the

provisions of subpart G of this part and those specified below:
(1) Applications for authorization in accordance with this paragraph must comply with the following technical limits or be accompanied by an engineering analysis demonstrating why these limits

must be exceeded:
(i) Maximum EIRP is limited to 35 dBW;
(ii) Transmitting antenna beamwidth is limited to 25 degrees (measured at the 3 dB points); and
(iii) Vertical polarization is used.
(2) These stations must not interfere with and must accept interference from current and future full- power UHF- TV stations, LPTV stations, and translator stations. They will also be secondary to land

mobile stations in areas where land mobile sharing is currently permitted.
(3) TV STL and TV relay stations licensed for operation on UHF TV channels 52- 69 based on applications filed before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register) may continue

to operate under the terms of their current authorizations until the end of transition to digital television in their market (DTV Transition), as set forth in §§ 73.622- 73.625. Applications for TV STL and TV relay
stations operating on UHF TV channels 52- 69 will not be accepted for filing on or after (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register).

(4) TV translator relay stations licensed for operation on UHF TV channels 52- 59 based on applications filed before the end of DTV transition may continue to operate under the terms of their
current authorizations indefinitely. TV translator relay stations licensed for operation on UHF TV channels 60- 69 based on applications filed before the end of DTV transition may continue to operate
under the terms of their current authorizations until the end of DTV Transition. Applications for TV translator relay stations operating on UHF TV channels 52- 69 will not be accepted for filing on or after
the end of DTV Transition.
(i) * * * This band is co- equally shared with mobile stations licensed pursuant to Parts 78 and 101 of the Commission's Rules. * * *

* * * * *
38. Section 74.603 is revised by removing and reserving paragraph (b).
§ 74.603 Sound channels.
* * * * *
89
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
90
(b) [Reserved]
* * * * *
39. Section 74.604 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (a).
§ 74.604 Interference avoidance.
(a) [Reserved]
* * * * *
40. Section 74.631 is amended by revising the first sentence of paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 74.631 Permissible service.
(a) The licensee of a television pickup station authorizes the transmission of program material, orders concerning such program material, and related communications necessary to the accomplishment

of such transmissions, from the scenes of events occurring in places other than a television studio, to its associated television broadcast station, to an associated television relay station, to such other stations as
are broadcasting the same program material, or to the network or networks with which the television broadcast station is affiliated.

* * * * *
41. Section 74.632 is amended by removing the last two sentences of paragraph (a) and the Note following paragraph (f), and revising the first sentence of paragraph (c), and paragraphs (e) and (g).

§ 74.632 Licensing requirements.
* * * * *
(c) An application for a new TV pickup station shall designate the TV broadcast station with which it is to be operated and specify the area in which the proposed operation is intended. * * *

* * * * *
(e) A license for a TV translator relay station will be issued only to licensees of low power TV and TV translator stations. However, a television translator relay station license may be issued to a

cooperative enterprise wholly owned by licensees of television broadcast translators or licensees of television broadcast translators and cable television owners or operators upon a showing that the applicant
is qualified under the Communication Act of 1934, as amended.
* * * * *
(g) In case of permanent discontinuance of operations of a station licensed under this subpart, the licensee shall cancel the station license using FCC Form 601. For purposes of this section, a station

which is not operated for a period of one year is considered to have been permanently discontinued.
42. Section 74.633 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 74.633 Temporary authorizations.
90
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
91
* * * * *
(b) A request for special temporary authority for the operation of a television broadcast auxiliary station must be made in accordance with the procedures of § 1.931( b) of this chapter.

(c) All requests for special temporary authority of a television broadcast auxiliary station must include full particulars including: licensee's name and address, facility identification number of the
associated broadcast station( s) (if any), call letters of the television broadcast STL or intercity relay station (if assigned), type and manufacturer of equipment, effective isotropic radiated power, emission,
frequency or frequencies proposed for use, commencement and termination date and location of the proposed operation, and purpose for which request is made including any particular justification.

* * * * *
43. Section 74.636 is revised as follows:
§ 74.636 Power limitations.
(a) On any authorized frequency, transmitter peak output power and the average power delivered to an antenna in this service must be the minimum amount of power necessary to carry out the

communications desired and shall not exceed the values listed in the table below. Application of this principle includes, but is not to be limited to, requiring a licensee who replaces one or more of its
antennas with larger antennas to reduce its antenna input power by an amount appropriate to compensate for the increased primary lobe gain of the replacement antenna( s). In no event shall the average
equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP), as referenced to an isotropic radiator, exceed the values specified below. In cases of harmful interference, the Commission may, after notice and opportunity for
hearing, order a change in the effective radiated power of this station. The table follows:
Maximum Allowable Transmitter Power Maximum Allowable EIRP 2 Frequency Band (MHz)

Mobile (W) Fixed (dBW) Mobile (dBW) 2,025 to 2,110................... 12.0 +45 +35
2,450 to 2,483.5................ 12.0 +45 +35 6,425 to 6,525................... 12.0 ........................ +35
6,875 to7,125.................... 12.0 +55 +35 12,700 to 13,250............... 1.5 +55 +45
17,700 to 18,600............... ..................................... +55 ......................... 18,600 to 18,800 1 ............ ..................................... +35 .........................
18,800 to 19,700............... ..................................... +55 ......................... 1
The power delivered to the antenna is limited to –3 dBW. 2 Stations licensed based on an application filed before (insert date 30 days after

publication in the Federal Register), for EIRP values exceeding those specified above, may continue to operate indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic
renewal.
(b) The EIRP of transmitters that use Automatic Transmitter Power Control (ATPC) shall not exceed the EIRP specified on the station authorization. The EIRP of non- ATPC transmitters shall be

maintained as near as practicable to the EIRP specified on the station authorization.
91
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
92
44. Section 74.637 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) and by removing the entries for 31,000 to 31,300 and 38,600- 40,000 from the table in paragraph (g) to read as follows:
§ 74.637 Emissions and emission limitations.
(a) The mean power of emissions shall be attenuated below the mean transmitter power (PMEAN) in accordance with the following schedule:

250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: As specified by the following equation but in no event less than 50 decibels:

including 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: As specified by the following equation but in no event less than 11 decibels:

A = 11 + 0.4( G - 50) + 10 Log10 B. (Attenuation greater than 56 decibels is not required.)
(iii) In any 4 kHz reference bandwidth (BREF), the center frequency of which is removed from the assigned frequency by more than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth: At least 43 +10 Log10 (PMEAN
in watts) decibels, or 80 decibels, whichever is the lesser attenuation.
(3) Amplitude Modulation. For vestigial sideband AM video: On any frequency removed from the center frequency of the authorized band by more than 50%: at least 50 dB below peak power of the

emission.
92
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
93
(b) For all emissions not covered in paragraph (a) of this section, the peak power of emissions shall be attenuated below the peak envelope transmitter power (PPEAK) in accordance with the following
schedule:
(1) On any frequency 500 Hz inside the channel edge up to and including 2500 Hz outside the same edge, the following formula will apply:

W = the channel bandwidth (kHz).
(2) On any frequency removed from the channel edge by more than 2500 Hz: At least 43+ 10 Log10 (PPEAK in watts) dB.

(c) For purposes of compliance with the emission limitation requirements of this section:
(1) If the transmitter modulates a single carrier, digital modulation techniques are considered as being employed when digital modulation occupies 50 percent or more of the total peak frequency

(2) If the transmitter modulates two or more carriers, with at least one using digital modulation and one using frequency or other analog modulation, digital modulation techniques are considered as
being employed when the necessary bandwidth of the digital signal( s) is 50 percent or more of the aggregate bandwidth of the system, comprising the digital necessary bandwidth( s), the analog necessary
bandwidth( s), and any bandwidth( s) between the digital and analog necessary bandwidths. In this case, the aggregate bandwidth shall be used for the authorized bandwidth (B) in paragraph (a) of this section,
and for purposes of compliance with the bandwidth limitations in paragraph (g) of this section and in § 74.602 of this subpart; and the sum of the powers of the analog and digital signals shall be used for mean
transmitter power (PMEAN) in paragraph (a) or the peak envelope transmitter power (PPEAK) in paragraph (b) of this section, and for purposes of compliance with the power limitations in § 74.636 of this subpart.

(3) For demonstrating compliance with the attenuation requirements for frequency modulation and digital modulation in paragraph (a) of this section, the resolution bandwidth (BRES) of the measuring
equipment used for measurements removed from the center frequency by more than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth shall be 100 kHz for operating frequencies below 1 GHz, and 1 MHz for operating
frequencies above 1 GHz. The resolution bandwidth for frequencies removed from the center frequency by less than 250 percent of the authorized bandwidth shall be the reference bandwidth (BREF) specified in
the individual emission limitations, but may be reduced to not less than one percent of the authorized bandwidth (B), adjusted upward to the nearest greater resolution bandwidth available on the measuring
equipment. In all cases, if BRES and BREF are not equal, then the attenuation requirement must be increased (or decreased) as determined by a factor of 10 log10 [( BREF in megahertz)/( BRES in megahertz)]
decibels, where a positive factor indicates an increase in the attenuation requirement and a negative factor indicates a decrease in the attenuation requirement.
93
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
94
(4) Stations licensed pursuant to an application filed before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register), using equipment not conforming with the emission limitations
specified above, may continue to operate indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic renewal. Existing equipment and equipment of product lines in
production before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), authorized via certification or verification before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register), for
equipment not conforming to the emission limitations requirements specified above, may continue to be manufactured and/ or marketed, but may not be authorized for use under a station license except at stations
licensed pursuant to an application filed before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register). Any non- conforming equipment authorized under a station license, and replaced on or after
(insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register), must be replaced by conforming equipment.

* * * * *
45. Section 74.638 is revised to read as follows:
§ 74.638 Frequency coordination.
(a) Coordination of all frequency assignments for fixed stations in all bands above 2110 MHz, and for mobile (temporary fixed) stations in the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz, will be in

accordance with the procedure established in paragraph (b) of this section, except that the prior coordination process for mobile (temporary fixed) assignments may be completed orally and the period
allowed for response to a coordination notification may be less than 30 days if the parties agree. Coordination of all frequency assignments for all mobile (temporary fixed) stations in all bands above
2110 MHz, except the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz, will be conducted in accordance with the procedure established in paragraph (b) of this section or with the procedure in paragraph (d) of this
section. Coordination of all frequency assignments for all fixed stations in the band 1990- 2110 MHz will be in accordance with the procedure established in paragraph (c) of this section. Coordination of all
frequency assignments for all mobile (temporary fixed) stations in the band 1990- 2110 MHz will be conducted in accordance with the procedure in paragraph (d) of this section.

(b) Frequency coordination for all fixed stations in all bands above 2110 MHz, and for all mobile (temporary fixed) stations in the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz. For each frequency
authorized under this part, the interference protection criteria in § 101.105( a), (b), and (c) of this chapter and the frequency usage coordination procedures in § 101.103( d) of this chapter will apply, except that
only stations in the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz are subject to the provision in § 101.103( d) requiring compliance with § 101.21( f) of this chapter in coordinating frequency usage with
stations in the fixed satellite service.
(c) Frequency coordination for all fixed stations in the band 1990- 2110 MHz. For each frequency authorized under this part, the following frequency usage coordination procedures will apply:

(1) General requirements. Applicants are responsible for selecting the frequency assignments that are least likely to result in mutual interference with other licensees in the same area. Applicants may
consult local frequency coordination committees, where they exist, for information on frequencies available in the area. Proposed frequency usage must be coordinated with existing licensees and
applicants in the area whose facilities could affect or be affected by the new proposal in terms of frequency interference on active channels, applied- for channels, or channels coordinated for future
94
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
95
growth. Coordination must be completed prior to filing an application for regular authorization, for major amendment to a pending application, or for major modification to a license.
(2) To be acceptable for filing, all applications for regular authorization, or major amendment to a pending application, or major modification to a license, must include a certification attesting that all co-channel
and adjacent- channel licensees and applicants potentially affected by the proposed fixed use of the frequency( ies) have been notified and are in agreement that the proposed facilities can be installed
without causing harmful interference to those other licensees and applicants.
(d) Frequency coordination for all mobile (temporary fixed) stations in all bands above 1990 MHz, except the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz. For each frequency authorized under this

part, applicants are responsible for selecting the frequency assignments that are least likely to result in mutual interference with other licensees in the same area. Applicants may consult local frequency
coordination committees, where they exist, for information on frequencies available in the area. In selecting frequencies, consideration should be given to the relative location of receive points, normal
transmission paths, and the nature of the contemplated operation.
46. Section 74.641 is amended by revising the introductory text of paragraph (a), removing the line for 31.0 to 31.3 and footnotes 2 and 3 from the table in paragraph (a)( 1), removing the second

sentence of paragraph (a)( 5), and revising the introductory text of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 74.641 Antenna systems.
(a) For fixed stations operating above 2025 MHz, the following standards apply:
* * * * *
(b) All fixed stations are to use antenna systems in conformance with the standards of this section. TV auxiliary broadcast stations are considered to be located in an area subject to frequency

congestion and must employ a Category A antenna when:
* * * * *
47. Section 74.643 is revised to read as follows:
§ 74.643 Interference to geostationary- satellites.
Applicants and licensees must comply with § 101.145 of this chapter to minimize the potential of interference to geostationary- satellites.

48. Section 74.644 is amended by revising the table in paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 74.644 Minimum path lengths for fixed links.
(a) * * *
Frequency band (MHz) Minimum path length (km) Below 1,990 ........................... n/ a

1,990 – 7,125.......................... 17
12,200 – 13,250...................... 5
95
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
96
Above 17,700 ......................... n/ a
(b) For paths shorter than those specified in the Table, the EIRP shall not exceed the value derived from the following equation.
EIRP = MAXEIRP – 40 log( A/ B) dBW
Where:
EIRP = The new maximum EIRP (equivalent isotropically radiated power) in dBW. MAXEIRP = Maximum EIRP as set forth in the Table in § 74.636 of this part.

A = Minimum path length from the Table above for the frequency band in kilometers. B = The actual path length in kilometers.

NOTES TO PARAGRAPH (b):
(1) For transmitters using Automatic Transmitter Power Control, EIRP corresponds to the maximum transmitter power available, not the coordinated transmit power or the nominal transmit power.

(2) Stations licensed based on an application filed before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), in the 2450- 2483.5 MHz band, for EIRP values exceeding those specified
above, may continue to operate indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic renewal.

* * * * *
49. Section 74.651 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b), removing paragraphs (c) and (d), and redesignating paragraph (e) as new paragraph (c) to read as follows:

§ 74.651 Equipment changes.
(a) Modifications may be made to an existing authorization in accordance with §§ 1.929 and 1.947 of this chapter.

(b) Multiplexing equipment may be installed on any licensed TV broadcast STL, TV relay or translator relay station without authority from the Commission.
* * * * *
50. Section 74.655 is amended by removing the last sentence of paragraph (a).
51. Section 74.661 is amended by revising the table to read as follows:
§ 74.661 Frequency tolerance.
* * * * *
Frequency band (MHz) Frequency tolerance (%) 2,025 to 2,110 0.005 1

2,450 to 2,483.5 0.001 2
96
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
97
6,425 to 6,525 0.005 6,875 to 7,125 0.005 1
12,700 to 13,250 0.005 1 17,700 to 18,820 0.003
18,920 to 19,700 0.003 1
Television translator relay stations shall maintain a frequency tolerance of 0.002%.

2 Stations licensed pursuant to an application filed before (insert date
two years after publication in the Federal Register), for tolerance values exceeding those specified above, may continue to operate

indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic renewal. Existing equipment and
equipment of product lines in production before (insert date 30 days after publication in the Federal Register), authorized via
certification or verification before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal Register), for tolerance values
exceeding those specified above, may continue to be manufactured and/ or marketed, but may not be authorized for use under station
license except at stations licensed pursuant to an application filed before (insert date two years after publication in the Federal
Register). Any non- conforming equipment authorized under a station license, and replaced on or after (insert date two years after
publication in the Federal Register), must be replaced by conforming equipment.

52. Section 74.801 is amended by adding a definition for Wireless Assist Video Device in alphabetical order to read as follows:
§ 74.801 Definitions.
* * * * *
Wireless Assist Video Device. An auxiliary station authorized and operated by motion picture and television program producers pursuant to the provisions of this subpart. These stations are intended to

transmit over distances of approximately 300 meters for use as an aid in composing camera shots on motion picture and television sets.

53. Section 74.802 is amended by revising paragraph (b)( 3) to read as follows:
§ 74.802 Frequency assignment.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) 470.000- 608.000 MHz and 614.000- 806.000 MHz
All zones 113 km (70 miles)
* * * * *
97
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
98
54. Section 74.832 is amended by revising paragraphs (e), (g), and (i) to read as follows:
§ 74.832 Licensing requirements and procedures.
* * * * *
(e) An application for low power auxiliary stations or for a change in an existing authorization shall specify the broadcast station, or the network with which the low power broadcast auxiliary facilities

are to be principally used as given in paragraph (h) of this section; or it shall specify the motion picture or television production company or the cable television operator with which the low power broadcast
auxiliary facilities are to be solely used. A single application, filed on FCC Form 601 may be used in applying for the authority to operate one or more low power auxiliary units. The application must specify
the frequency bands which will be used. Motion picture producers, television program producers, and cable television operators are required to attach a single sheet to their application form explaining in detail
the manner in which the eligibility requirements given in paragraph (a) of this section are met.
* * * * *
(g) Low power auxiliary licensees shall specify the maximum number of units that will be operated.

* * * * *
(i) In case of permanent discontinuance of operations of a station licensed under this subpart, the licensee shall cancel the station license using FCC Form 601. For purposes of this section, a station

which is not operated for a period of one year is considered to have been permanently discontinued.
* * * * *
55. Section 74.833 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 74.833 Temporary authorizations.
* * * * *
(b) A request for special temporary authority for the operation of a remote pickup broadcast station must be made in accordance with the procedures of § 1.931( b) of this chapter.

(c) All requests for special temporary authority of a low power auxiliary station must include full particulars including: licensees name and address, statement of eligibility, facility identification number
of the associated broadcast station (if any), type and manufacturer of equipment, power output, emission, frequency or frequencies proposed to be used, commencement and termination date, location of proposed
operation, and purpose for which request is made including any particular justification.
* * * * *
98
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
99
56. A new Section 74.870 is added to read as follows:
§ 74.870 Wireless video assist devices.
Television Broadcast Auxiliary licensees and motion picture and television producers, as defined in § 74.801 of this part, may operate wireless video assist devices on a non- interference basis on VHF and

UHF television channels to assist with production activities.
(a) The use of wireless video assist devices must comply with all provisions of this subpart, except as indicated in paragraphs (b) through (i) of this section.

(b) Wireless video assist devices may only be used for scheduled productions. They may not be used to produce live events and may not be used for electronic news gathering purposes.
(c) Wireless video assist devices may operate with a bandwidth not to exceed 6 MHz on frequencies in the bands 180- 210 MHz (TV channels 8- 12) and 470- 698 MHz (TV channels 14- 51)
subject to the following restrictions:
(1) The bandwidth may only occupy a single TV channel.
(2) Operation is prohibited within the 608- 614 MHz (TV channel 37) band.
(3) Operation is prohibited within 129 km of a television broadcasting station, including Class A television stations, low power television stations and translator stations.

(4) For the area and frequency combinations listed in the table below, operation is prohibited within the distances indicated from the listed geographic coordinates.
Note: All coordinates are referenced to the North American Datum of 1983.
99
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
100
Area North latitude West longitude
Excluded frequencies
(MHz)
Excluded channels

200 km 128 km 52 km Boston, MA........................... 42 o 21' 24.4" 71 o 03' 23.2" 470- 476 14
476- 482 15 482- 488 16
488- 494 17 Chicago, IL ........................... 41 o 52' 28.1" 87 o 38' 22.2" 470- 476 14
476- 482 15 482- 488 16
Cleveland, OH 1 ..................... 41 o 29' 51.2" 81 o 41' 49.5" 470- 476 14 476- 482 15
482- 488 16 488- 494 17
Dallas/ Fort Worth, TX.......... 32 o 47' 09.5" 96 o 47' 38.0" 476- 482 15 482- 488 16
488- 494 17 Detroit, MI 1 ........................... 42 o 19' 48.1" 83 o 02' 56.7" 470- 476 14
476- 482 15 482- 488 16
488- 494 17 Gulf of Mexico 476- 494 15, 16, 17
Hawaii 488- 494 17 Houston, TX.......................... 29 o 45' 26.8" 95 o 21' 37.8" 482- 488 16
488- 494 17 494- 500 18
Los Angeles, CA................... 34 o 03' 15.0" 118 o 14' 31.3" 470- 476 14 476- 482 15
482- 488 16 488- 494 17
500- 506 19 506- 512 20
512- 518 21 Miami, Fl............................... 25 o 46' 38.4" 80 o 11' 31.2" 470- 476 14
476- 482 15 New York/ N. E. New Jersey.. 40 o 45' 06.4" 73 o 59' 37.5" 470- 476 14
476- 482 15 482- 488 16
488- 494 17 Philadelphia, PA ................... 39 o 56' 58.4" 75 o 09' 19.6" 494- 500 18
500- 506 19 506- 512 20
512- 518 21 Pittsburgh, PA....................... 40 o 26' 19.2" 79 o 59' 59.2" 470- 476 14
476- 482 15 488- 494 17
100
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
101
Area North latitude West longitude
Excluded frequencies
(MHz)
Excluded channels

200 km 128 km 52 km 494- 500 18
500- 506 19 San Francisco/ Oakland, CA.. 37 o 46' 38.7" 122 o 24' 43.9" 476- 482 15
482- 488 16 488- 494 17
494- 500 18 Washington D. C./ MD/ VA .... 38 o 53' 51.4" 77 o 00' 31.9" 482- 488 16
488- 494 17 494- 500 18
500- 506 19 1
The distance separation requirements are not applicable in these cities until further order from the Commission.
101
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
102
(d) Wireless video assist devices are limited to a maximum of 250 milliwatts ERP and must limit power to that necessary to reliably receive a signal at a distance of 300 meters. Wireless video assist
devices must comply with the emission limitations of § 74.637 of this part.
(e) The antenna of a wireless video assist device must be attached to the transmitter either permanently, or by means of a unique connector designed to allow replacement of authorized antennas

but prevent the use of unauthorized antennas. When transmitting, the antenna must not be more that 10 meters above ground level.

(f)( 1) A license for a wireless video assist device will authorize the license holder to use all frequencies available for wireless video assist devices, subject to the limitations specified in this section.
(2) Licensees may operate as many wireless video assist devices as necessary, subject to the notification procedures of this section.
(g) Notification procedure. Prior to the commencement of transmitting, licensees must notify the local broadcasting coordinator of their intent to transmit. If there is no local coordinator in the intended
area of operation, licensees must notify all adjacent channel TV stations within 161 km (100 mi) of the proposed operating area.

(1) Notification must be made at least 10 working days prior to the date of intended transmission.
(2) Notifications must include:
(A) Frequency or frequencies.
(B) Location.
(C) Antenna height.
(D) Emission type( s).
(E) Effective radiated power.
(F) Intended dates of operation.
(G) Licensee contact information.
(3) (i) Failure of a local coordinator to respond to a notification request prior to the intended dates of operation indicated on the request will be considered as having the approval of the coordinator.

In this case, licensees must in addition notify all co- channel and adjacent channel TV stations within 161 km (100 mi) of the proposed operating area. This notification is for information purposes only and will
not enable TV stations to prevent a WAVD from operating, but is intended to help identify the source of interference if any is experienced after a WAVD begins operation.

(ii) If there is no local coordinator in the intended area of operation, failure of any adjacent channel TV station to respond to a notification request prior to the intended dates of operation indicated
on the request will be considered as having the approval of the TV station.
(4) Licensees must operate in a manner consistent with the response of the local coordinator, or, if there is no local coordinator in the intended area of operation, the responses of the adjacent channel TV

stations. Disagreements may be appealed to the Commission. However, in those instances, the licensee
102
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
103
will bear the burden of proof and proceeding to overturn the recommendation of the local coordinator or the co- channel or adjacent channel TV station.
(h) Licenses for wireless video assist devices may not be transferred or assigned.
(i) The product literature that manufacturers include with a wireless assist video device must contain information regarding the requirement for users to obtain an FCC license, the requirement that

stations must locate at least 129 kilometers away from a co- channel TV station, the limited class of users that may operate these devices, the authorized uses, the need for users to obtain a license, and the
requirement that a local coordinator (or adjacent channel TV stations, if there is no local coordinator) must be notified prior to operation.

57. Section 74.882 is revised to read as follows:
§ 74.882 Station identification.
(a) For transmitters used for voice transmissions and having a transmitter output power exceeding 50 mW, an announcement shall be made at the beginning and end of each period of operation

at a single location, over the transmitting unit being operated, identifying the transmitting unit’s call sign or designator, its location, and the call sign of the broadcasting station or name of the licensee with which
it is being used. A period of operation may consist of a continuous transmission or intermittent transmissions pertaining to a single event.

(b) Each wireless video assist device, when transmitting, must transmit station identification at the beginning and end of each period of operation. Identification may be made by transmitting the station
call sign by visual or aural means or by automatic transmission in international Morse telegraphy.
(1) A period of operation is defined as a single uninterrupted transmission or a series of intermittent transmissions from a single location.

(2) Station identification shall be performed in a manner conducive to prompt association of the signal source with the responsible licensee. In exercising the discretion provide by this rule, licensees are
expected too act in a responsible manner to assure that result.
PART 78 – CABLE TELEVISION RELAY SERVICE
58. The authority citation for Part 78 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: Secs. 2, 3, 4, 301, 303, 307, 308, 309, 48 Stat., as amended, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1081, 1082, 1083, 1084, 1085; 47 U. S. C. 152, 153, 154, 301, 303, 307, 308, 309.

59. Section 78.18 is amended by revising paragraph (l) to read as follows:
§ 78.18 Frequency assignments.
* * * * *
(l) The band 13.15 - 13.20 GHz is reserved for the assignment of CARS Pickup and Television Pickup stations on a primary co- equal basis within 50 kilometers of the television markets defined in §

76.53 of this chapter. The band 13.20 - 13.2125 GHz is reserved exclusively for the assignment of Television Pickup stations on a primary basis. Fixed stations licensed prior to (insert date 30 days after
103
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
104
date of publication in the Federal Register) may continue operation under their current status on channels in the 13.15 - 13.2125 GHz band, subject to periodic license renewals.
60. Section 78.36 is revised to read as follows:
§ 78.36 Frequency coordination.
(a) Coordination of all frequency assignments for fixed stations in all bands above 2110 MHz, and for mobile (temporary fixed) stations in the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz, will be in

(1) General requirements. Proposed frequency usage must be prior coordinated with existing licensees, permittees, and applicants in the area, and other applicants with previously filed applications,
whose facilities could affect or be affected by the new proposal in terms of frequency interference on active channels, applied- for channels, or channels coordinated for future growth. Coordination must be
completed prior to filing an application for regular authorization, or a major amendment to a pending application, or any major modification to a license. In coordinating frequency usage with stations in the
fixed satellite service, applicants for stations in the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz must also comply with the requirements of § 101.21( f). In engineering a system or modification thereto, the
applicant must, by appropriate studies and analyses, select sites, transmitters, antennas and frequencies that will avoid interference in excess of permissible levels to other users. All applicants and licensees
must cooperate fully and make reasonable efforts to resolve technical problems and conflicts that may inhibit the most effective and efficient use of the radio spectrum; however, the party being coordinated
with is not obligated to suggest changes or re- engineer a proposal in cases involving conflicts. Applicants should make every reasonable effort to avoid blocking the growth of systems as prior coordinated. The
applicant must identify in the application all entities with which the technical proposal was coordinated. In the event that technical problems are not resolved, an explanation must be submitted with the
application. Where technical problems are resolved by an agreement or operating arrangement between the parties that would require special procedures be taken to reduce the likelihood of interference in
excess of permissible levels (such as the use of artificial site shielding) or would result in a reduction of quality or capacity of either system, the details thereof may be contained in the application.

(2) Coordination procedure guidelines are as follows:
(i) Coordination involves two separate elements: notification and response. Both or either may be oral or in written form. To be acceptable for filing, all applications and major technical amendments must

certify that coordination, including response, has been completed. The names of the licensees, permittees
104
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
105
and applicants with which coordination was accomplished must be specified. If such notice and/ or response is oral, the party providing such notice or response must supply written documentation of the
communication upon request;
(ii) Notification must include relevant technical details of the proposal. At minimum, this should include, as applicable, the following:

Applicant's name and address. Transmitting station name.
Transmitting station coordinates. Frequencies and polarizations to be added, changed or deleted.
Transmitting equipment type, its stability, actual output power, emission designator, and type of modulation (loading).
Transmitting antenna type( s), model, gain and, if required, a radiation pattern provided or certified by the manufacturer.
Transmitting antenna center line height( s) above ground level and ground elevation above mean sea level.
Receiving station name. Receiving station coordinates.
Receiving antenna type( s), model, gain, and, if required, a radiation pattern provided or certified by the manufacturer.
Receiving antenna center line height( s) above ground level and ground elevation above mean sea level.
Path azimuth and distance. Estimated transmitter transmission line loss expressed in dB.
Estimated receiver transmission line loss expressed in dB. For a system utilizing ATPC, maximum transmit power, coordinated transmit power, and nominal
transmit power.
Note: The position location of antenna sites shall be determined to an accuracy of no less than +/ -1 second in the horizontal dimensions (latitude and longitude) and +/- 1 meter in the vertical dimension

(ground elevation) with respect to the National Spacial Reference System.
(iii) For transmitters employing digital modulation techniques, the notification should clearly identify the type of modulation. Upon request, additional details of the operating characteristics of the

equipment must also be furnished;
(iv) Response to notification should be made as quickly as possible, even if no technical problems are anticipated. Any response to notification indicating potential interference must specify the technical

details and must be provided to the applicant, in writing, within the 30- day notification period. Every reasonable effort should be made by all applicants, permittees and licensees to eliminate all problems and
conflicts. If no response to notification is received within 30 days, the applicant will be deemed to have made reasonable efforts to coordinate and may file its application without a response;

(v) The 30- day notification period is calculated from the date of receipt by the applicant, permittee, or licensee being notified. If notification is by mail, this date may be ascertained by:
(A) The return receipt on certified mail;
(B) The enclosure of a card to be dated and returned by the recipient; or
105
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
106
(C) A conservative estimate of the time required for the mail to reach its destination. In the last case, the estimated date when the 30- day period would expire should be stated in the notification.
(vi) An expedited prior coordination period (less than 30 days) may be requested when deemed necessary by a notifying party. The coordination notice should be identified as "expedited" and the
requested response date should be clearly indicated. However, circumstances preventing a timely response from the receiving party should be accommodated accordingly. It is the responsibility of the
notifying party to receive written concurrence (or verbal, with written to follow) from affected parties or their coordination representatives.

(vii) All technical problems that come to light during coordination must be resolved unless a statement is included with the application to the effect that the applicant is unable or unwilling to resolve
the conflict and briefly the reason therefore;
(viii) Where a number of technical changes become necessary for a system during the course of coordination, an attempt should be made to minimize the number of separate notifications for these

changes. Where the changes are incorporated into a completely revised notice, the items that were changed from the previous notice should be identified. When changes are not numerous or complex, the
party receiving the changed notification should make an effort to respond in less than 30 days. When the notifying party believes a shorter response time is reasonable and appropriate, it may be helpful for that
party to so indicate in the notice and perhaps suggest a response date;
(ix) If, after coordination is successfully completed, it is determined that a subsequent change could have no impact on some parties receiving the original notification, these parties must be notified of

the change and of the coordinator's opinion that no response is required;
(x) Applicants, permittees and licensees should supply to all other applicants, permittees and licensees within their areas of operations, the name, address and telephone number of their coordination

representatives. Upon request from coordinating applicants, permittees and licensees, data and information concerning existing or proposed facilities and future growth plans in the area of interest
should be furnished unless such request is unreasonable or would impose a significant burden in compilation;

(xi) Parties should keep other parties with whom they are coordinating advised of changes in plans for facilities previously coordinated. If applications have not been filed 6 months after coordination
was initiated, parties may assume that such frequency use is no longer desired unless a second notification has been received within 10 days of the end of the 6 month period. Renewal notifications are to be sent to
all originally notified parties, even if coordination has not been successfully completed with those parties; and

(xii) Any frequency reserved by a licensee for future use in the bands subject to this part must be released for use by another licensee, permittee, or applicant upon a showing by the latter that it requires
an additional frequency and cannot coordinate one that is not reserved for future use.
(c) Frequency coordination for all fixed stations in the band 1990- 2110 MHz. For each frequency authorized under this part, the following frequency usage coordination procedures will apply:

(2) To be acceptable for filing, all applications for regular authorization, or major amendment to a pending application, or major modification to a license, must include a certification attesting that all co-channel
and adjacent- channel licensees and applicants potentially affected by the proposed fixed use of the frequency( ies) have been notified and are in agreement that the proposed facilities can be installed
without causing harmful interference to those other licensees and applicants.
(d) Frequency coordination for all mobile (temporary fixed) stations in all bands above 1990 MHz, except the bands 6425- 6525 MHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz. For each frequency authorized under this

part, applicants are responsible for selecting the frequency assignments that are least likely to result in mutual interference with other licensees in the same area. Applicants may consult local frequency
coordination committees, where they exist, for information on frequencies available in the area. In selecting frequencies, consideration should be given to the relative location of receive points, normal
transmission paths, and the nature of the contemplated operation.
107
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
108
61. Section 78.101 is amended by revising the entry for 2,025- 2,110 MHz in the table in paragraph (a) and adding a new paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 78.101 Power limitations.
(a) * * *
Maximum allowable transmitter power Maximum allowable EIRP 2 Frequency band
(MHz) Mobile (W) Fixed (dBW) Mobile (dBW)
2,025 to 2,110 ........ 20.0 ....................... +35 6,425 to 6,525 ........ 20.0 ....................... +35

6,875 to 7,125 ........ 20.0 ....................... +35 12,700 to 13,250 .... 1.5 +55 +45
17,700 to 18,600 .... ................................. +55 ........................ 18,600 to 18,800 1 .. ................................. +35 ........................
18,800 to 19,700 .... ................................. +55 ........................ 1 The power delivered to the antenna is limited to –3 dBW.
2 Stations licensed based on an application filed before (insert date 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register), for EIRP values exceeding those specified above, may continue to operate indefinitely in accordance with the terms of their current authorizations, subject to periodic

renewal.
* * * * *
(c) The EIRP of transmitters that use Automatic Transmitter Power Control (ATPC) shall not exceed the EIRP specified on the station authorization. The EIRP of non- ATPC transmitters shall be

maintained as near as practicable to the EIRP specified on the station authorization.
62. Section 78.103 is amended by removing the entry for 31,000 to 31,300 from the table in paragraph (e).

63. Section 78.105 is amended by revising the introductory sentence for paragraph (a); removing the entries for 31,000 to 31,300 and 38,600 to 40,000, and Footnotes 2 and 3 from the table in paragraph
(a)( 1); deleting paragraph (a)( 4) and redesignating paragraph (a)( 5) as paragraph (a)( 4) to read as follows:
§ 78.105 Antenna systems.
(a) For fixed stations operating in the 12.7- 13.2 GHz and 17.7- 19.7 GHz bands, the following standards apply:

* * * * *
64. Section 78.106 is revised to read as follows:
§ 78.106 Interference to geostationary- satellites.
Applicants and licensees must comply with § 101.145 of this chapter to minimize the potential of interference to geostationary- satellites.

65. Section 78.108 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
108
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
109
§ 78.108 Minimum path lengths for fixed links.
* * * * *
(b) For paths shorter than those specified in the Table, the EIRP shall not exceed the value derived from the following equation.

EIRP = MAXEIRP – 40 log( A/ B) dBW
Where:
EIRP = The new maximum EIRP (equivalent isotropically radiated power) in dBW. MAXEIRP = Maximum EIRP as set forth in the Table in § 74.636 of this part.

A = Minimum path length from the Table above for the frequency band in kilometers. B = The actual path length in kilometers.

NOTE TO PARAGRAPH (b): For transmitters using Automatic Transmitter Power Control, EIRP corresponds to the maximum transmitter power available, not the coordinated transmit power or the
nominal transmit power.
* * * * *
66. Section 78.111 is amended by removing the entry for 31,000 to 31,300 from the table.
PART 101 - FIXED MICROWAVE SERVICES
67. The authority citation for Part 101 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: 47 U. S. C. 154, 303.
68. Section 101.113 is amended by revising the column headings and the entry for the 12,700- 13,250 MHz frequency band in the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:

§ 101.113 Transmitter power limitations.
(a) * * *
Maximum allowable EIRP 1, 2 Frequency band (MHz) Fixed (dBW) Mobile (dBW)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 12,700- 13,200 4 .................................................. +50
13,200- 13,250 4 .................................................. +55 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1 Per polarization.
2 For multiples address operations, see § 101.147. Remote alarm units that are part of a multiple

address central station protection system are authorized a maximum of 2 watts.

* * * * *
3 Also see § 101.145.

* * * * *
109
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
110
69. Section 101.145 is amended by revising the introductory text to the paragraph, the first sentence in paragraph (b), and the first sentence in paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 101.145 Interference to geostationary- satellites.
These limitations are necessary to minimize the probability of harmful interference to reception in the bands 2655- 2690 MHz, 5925- 7075 MHz, and 12.7- 13.25 GHz on board geostationary- space stations

in the fixed- satellite service.
* * * * *
(b) 2655 to 2690 MHz and 5925 to 7075 MHz. * * *
(c) 12.7 to 13.25 GHz. * * *
* * * * *
70. Section 101.803 is amended by revising the first sentence in paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 101.803 Frequencies.
* * * * *
(b) Communications common carriers in the Local Television Transmission Service may be assigned frequencies listed in §§ 74.602( a), 78.18( a)( 6), and 78.18( a)( 7) of this chapter to provide service

to television broadcast stations, television broadcast network- entities, cable system operators, and cable network- entities. * * *

* * * * *
71. Section 101.807 is amended by adding a second sentence to read as follows:
§ 101.807 Transmitter Power.
* * * As an exception, operations on frequencies listed in §§ 74.602( a), 78.18( a)( 6), and 78.18( a)( 7) of this chapter are subject to the power limitations of §§ 74.636 and 78.101( a).
110
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
111
APPENDIX B: Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), 1 an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the Notice of Propose Rule Making, Revisions to

Broadcast Auxiliary Service Rules in Part 74 and Conforming Technical Rules for Broadcast Auxiliary Service, Cable Television Relay Service and Fixed Services in Parts 74, 78 and 101 of the Commission’s
Rules. 2 The Commission sought written public comment on the proposals in the Notice, including comment on the IRFA. The comments received are discussed below. This present Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) conforms to the RFA. 3
(A) Need for and Objective of the Report and Order.
The Report and Order updates the Broadcast Auxiliary Service (BAS) rules in Part 74 and will permit increased compatibility between Broadcast Auxiliary Services, the Cable Television Relay Service
(CARS), and Fixed Service Microwave (FS) systems operating on shared spectrum. Specifically, we permit TV and aural BAS stations to use any available digital modulation technique in all BAS frequency
bands so that BAS stations can take advantage of the latest developments in technology and make smooth the transition to digital TV and digital radio; update BAS emission masks to facilitate the introduction of
digital equipment and to provide consistency with emission masks used in Part 101 of the rules; modify the equation used by BAS and CARS services for determining the maximum effective isotropic radiated
power (EIRP) for short path lengths (this change eliminates the steep reduction in EIRP for BAS and CARS path lengths shorter than the minimum); allow BAS and CARS stations to use automatic transmit
power control (ATPC) in order to facilitate more efficient spectrum use; update transmitter power rules for BAS and CARS services to provide EIRP limits for all frequency bands; require TV BAS and CARS
services to prior coordinate their frequency use when using shared frequency bands to minimize the potential for harmful interference occurring when a new station begins transmitting. We also permit
“wireless assist video devices” to operate on certain VHF and UHF TV spectrum, thereby increasing spectrum efficiency and promoting equipment, which will increase safety at production sites as well as
lower film and television production costs. In addition, we update many other BAS rules and make minor rule changes to clarify or fix typographical errors in the existing rules.

(B) Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in Response to the IRFA.
In the Notice, the Commission performed an IRFA and asked for comments that specifically addressed issues raised in the IRFA. No parties filed comments directly in response to the IRFA. However,

commenters made recommendations regarding channel splitting, and the Commission, in response, is overlaying narrowband channels in various bands and is authorizing an effective date for channel splitting
in the 950 MHz aural BAS band.
(C) Description and Estimate of the Number of Entities Affected to Which Rules will Apply.

The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number of

2 See Notice of Proposed Rule Making, ET Docket No. 01- 75, 16 FCC Rcd 10556, 10601 (2001).
3 See 5 U. S. C. § 604.
111
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
112
small entities that may be affected by the action taken. 4 The RFA generally defines the term “small entity” as having the same meaning as the terms “small business,” “small organization,” and “small
governmental jurisdiction.” 5 In addition, the term “small business” has the same meaning as the term “small business concern” under the Small Business Act. 6 A small business concern is one that: (1) is
independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business Administration (SBA). 7 A small organization is
generally “any not- for- profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.” 8 Nationwide, as of 1992, there were approximately 275,801 small organizations. 9 Finally,
“small governmental jurisdiction” generally means “governments of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of less than 50,000.” 10 As of 1992, there
were approximately 85,006 such jurisdictions in the United States. 11 This number includes 38,978 counties, cities, and towns; of these, 37,566, or 96 percent, have populations of fewer than 50,000. 12 The
United States Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) estimates that this ratio is approximately accurate for all governmental entities. Thus, of the 85,006 governmental entities, we estimate that 81,600 (91 percent)
are small entities.
The rules adopted in this R& O affect licensees of BAS (Remote Pickup, aural, and television), CARS, and fixed microwave services. Additionally, they affect manufacturers of equipment that supports the

BAS.
Broadcast Auxiliary Service (BAS) involves a variety of transmitters, generally used to relay broadcast programming to the public (through translator and booster stations) or within the program distribution

chain (from a remote news gathering unit back to the stations). The Commission has not developed a definition of small entities specific to broadcast auxiliary licensees. The U. S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) has developed small business size standards, as follows: 1) For TV BAS, we will use the size standard for Television Broadcasting, which consists of all such companies having annual
receipts of no more than $12.0 million; 13 2) For Aural BAS, we will use the size standard for Radio
4 5 U. S. C. § 603( b)( 3).
5 Id., § 601( 6).
6 5 U. S. C. § 601( 3) (incorporating by reference the definition of “small business concern” in 15 U. S. C. § 632).
Pursuant to the RFA, the statutory definition of a small business applies “unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and after opportunity for public comment,

establishes one or more definitions of such term which are appropriate to the activities of the agency and publishes such definition( s) in the Federal Register.” 5 U. S. C. § 601( 3).

7 Small Business Act, 15 U. S. C. § 632.
8 5 U. S. C. § 601( 4).
9 1992 Economic Census, U. S. Bureau of the Census, Table 6 (special tabulation of data under contract to Office
of Advocacy of the U. S. Small Business Administration).
10 5 U. S. C. § 601( 5).

11 U. S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, “1992 Census of Governments.”
12 Id.
13 13 C. F. R. § 121.201, NAICS code 513120.
112
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
113
Stations, which consists of all such companies having annual receipts of no more than $6 million; 14 3) For Remote Pickup BAS we will use the small business size standard for Television Broadcasting when used
by a TV station and that for Radio Stations when used by such a station.
According to Census Bureau data for 1997, there were 906 Television Broadcasting firms, total that operated for the entire year. 15 Of this total, 734 firms had annual receipts of $9,999,999.00 or less and an

additional 71 had receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.00. 16 Thus, under this standard, the majority of firms can be considered small.

According to Census Bureau data for 1997, there were 4,476 Radio Stations (firms), total, that operated for the entire year. 17 Of this total 4,265 had annual receipts of $4,999,999.00 or less, and an additional
103 firms had receipts of $5 million to $9,999,999.00. 18 Thus, under this standard, the great majority of firms can be considered small.

Cable Antenna Relay Service (CARS) includes transmitters generally used to relay cable programming within cable television system distribution systems. The SBA has developed a small business size
standard for Cable and other Program Distribution, which consists of all such companies having annual receipts of no more than $12.5 million. 19 According to Census Bureau data for 1997, there were 1,311
firms within the industry category Cable and Other Program Distribution, total, that operated for the entire year. 20 Of this total, 1,180 firms had annual receipts of $9,999,999.00 or less, and an additional 52
firms had receipts of $10 million to $24,999,999.00. 21 Thus, under this standard, the majority of firms can be considered small.

Fixed Microwave Services (FS) includes common carrier, private- operational fixed, and broadcast auxiliary radio services. Presently there are approximately 22,015 common carrier fixed licensees and
61,670 private operational- fixed licensees and broadcast auxiliary radio licensees in the microwave services. The SBA has developed a small business size standard for Cellular and other Wireless
Telecommunications, which consists of all such companies having 1,500 or fewer employees. 22 According to Census Bureau data for 1997, there were 977 firms in this category, total, that operated for
the entire year. 23 Of this total, 965 firms had employment of 999 or fewer employees, and an additional
14 Id. at NAICS code 513112.
15 U. S. Census Bureau, 1997 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, “Receipts Size of Firms Subject to
Federal Income Tax: 1997,” Table 4, NAICS code 513120 (issued Oct. 2000).
16 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate.

17 Id. At NAICS code 513112.
18 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate.
19 Id. at NAICS code 513220.
20 Id. at NAICS code 513220.
21 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate.
22 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 513322.
23 U. S. Census Bureau, 1997 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, “Employment Size of Firms Subject
to Federal Income Tax: 1997,” Table 5, NAICS code 513310 (issued Oct. 2000).
113
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
114
12 had employment of 1,000 employees or more. 24 Thus, under this standard, virtually all firms can be considered small.
(D) Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance Requirements for Small Entities.

Under the rules adopted in this R& O, there are changes to reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements. In many cases, these changes streamline the existing licensing process or provide
additional flexibility to licensees and applicants. Many of the proposed changes are related to the use of the Universal Licensing System (ULS) by BAS applicants and licensees. Applicants for BAS stations
must apply through the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau using the ULS, which was adopted by Report and Order in 1998. To comply with this system, our decisions in this R& O are consistent with the
decisions reached in that Report and Order. Accordingly, we have eliminated requests made by letter if there is a standard application form that can be used instead, modified the rules defining major and minor
changes to those used for fixed microwave systems, and eliminated the need to report transmitter output power and requiring that all stations comply with limits on effective isotropic radiated power. We also
have changed the period of construction for a BAS station from the currently used three years to eighteen months, consistent with the period used for fixed microwave stations.

Additionally, we have conformed some of the rules that affect frequency bands that are shared among BAS licensees (Part 74), CARS licensees (Part 78), and fixed microwave licensees (Part 101).
Specifically, we have updated the rules that protect interference to geostationary satellites from receiving harmful interference from fixed stations to those currently listed in the ITU International Radio
Regulations. The effect of this update is to expand the number of frequency bands to which these rules apply. We also have adopted for BAS equipment, emission limitations that are consistent with those
already being used for fixed microwave stations. We also are generally requiring that all BAS applicants for fixed stations operating above 944 MHz comply with the same frequency coordination guidelines in
place for fixed microwave stations.
Further changes entail providing technical guidelines for TV studio- to- transmitter links and TV relay stations that operate on UHF- TV channels. These guidelines have always been imposed, but never

codified. Also, with respect to BAS Remote Pickup stations, we are altering their channel plan to be consistent with the same channel spacing requirements as are used for Private Land Mobile Radio stations
in Part 90 of our rules. Finally, as noted, we have allowed a new type of device to operate on certain VHF and UHF TV channels, wireless assist video devices. These devices will follow the existing service
rules for Low Power Auxiliary Stations, with minor exceptions. 25
(E) Steps Taken to Minimize the Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities and Significant Alternatives Considered.

The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1) the
establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance or

24 Id. The census data do not provide a more precise estimate of the number of firms that have employment of
1,500 or fewer employees; the largest category provided is “Firms with 1,000 employees or more.”
25 See Report and Order, paragraphs 153, 154 and 155, supra.
114
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
115
reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities. 26
We have reduced burdens wherever possible. Our rules regarding the BAS would reduce burdens on small entities. First, we have simplified and expanded the opportunity for aural and TV BAS licensees to
use digital modulation techniques in all of their allocated frequency bands. Currently, they can use these techniques only in a few bands and must file waiver requests and requests for special temporary authority
(STA) to transmit digital signals in other bands. Our rules eliminate the need for these waivers and STAs, thus saving businesses the time it takes to prepare these requests and their associated filing fees. Second,
we have altered the equation used to determine the allowable EIRP for short path lengths. Under our new rules, there will no longer be a large drop- off in allowable EIRP when the path length of a fixed station is
slightly shorter than the minimum necessary for maximum power. The effect of this is to provide more flexibility in the way small entities design their systems. Because they will be able to use fewer sites, this
has the effect of a reduction in the cost of a system. Third, we have allowed automatic transmit power control (ATPC). ATPC benefits small entities by reducing outages to digital receivers and expanding
battery life. Both of these effects benefit small businesses by making their systems more reliable.
Many of our rule amendments and their benefits stem from the use of the ULS for application filing. This system, by providing for electronic filing on standardized forms, benefits small entities in several ways.

Applicants can submit applications to the Commission as soon as they have the necessary information on- hand, and they receive instant feedback as to the correctness of that application because ULS will not
accept the application for filing unless it is correct. If there are errors, ULS provided error messages so that the application can be corrected and resubmitted. Also, the system makes extensive use of electronic
processing, so that many of the tasks that were done by hand are now done by computer. The overall effect is that applications are processed faster and licenses are issued sooner, thus allowing small entities
to begin providing service in a more timely manner.
We have also adopted rule amendments that conform rules for similar services that share spectrum. These are TV BAS, CARS, and the fixed microwave service. As a whole, these amendments reduce burdens to

small entities because many of these entities have licenses in each of these rule parts, but must currently contend with different rules in each part. Thus, small entities will benefit because they will, in many
instances, be able to comply with a common set of rules for their systems, which operate in any of the named services.

Additionally, we have adopted many other rule changes that will benefit small entities. We are requiring that fixed BAS systems prior coordinate their frequency use, which will ensure that systems operate in a
manner that minimizes the potential of causing interference. This protects the new system from possibly being shut down due to causing interference and protects the existing system from suffering a service
disruption from receiving interference. Both of these results will benefit small entities operating in the BAS service. Along with the frequency coordination requirement, we have extended the ability to
operate under temporary conditional authority to all BAS frequency bands. This benefits small entities by allowing them to begin operating sooner. Further, we have extended the reach of the short- term operation
rule to all entities eligible for a BAS license. This benefits small entities because many would not need to obtain additional licenses from the Commission to provide limited service a few times a year in areas in
which they do not traditionally operate. Such a change saves small entities the time and money that they would otherwise expend obtaining a license. Another change entails the Commission establishing
technical requirements for operating TV STLs or TV relay stations on UHF- TV channels. This change
26 5 U. S. C. § 603( c).
115
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
116
permits applicants to know the requirements they must meet before applying for a license, thereby reducing the number or applications that must be returned by the Commission. Thus, small entities will
benefit by having to respond to returned applications less often. We have also altered the channel plan for Remote Pickup BAS to conform to the channel plan adopted for PLMR services. Unless the same
technical criteria are used for both services, different radios must be developed. Thus, our rules change will benefit small entities by lowering equipment costs. Finally, we have permitted motion picture and
television producers to operate new wireless assist video devices on certain unused VHF and UHF TV channels. This will benefit small entities by providing a more cost effective means for producers to
monitor multiple camera angles when producing program material.
The regulatory burdens we have retained, such as filing applications on appropriate forms, are necessary to ensure that the public receives the benefits of new and existing services in a prompt and efficient

manner. We also considered revising the burden of frequency coordination for fixed BAS systems, but found that this alternative would unnecessarily increase the potential of harmful interference. However,
under our frequency coordination procedures, entities may self coordinate rather than paying a frequency coordinator. We will continue to examine alternatives in the future with the objectives of eliminating
unnecessary regulations and minimizing significant economic impact on small entities.
F) Report to Congress.
The Commission will send a copy of the Report and Order, including this FRFA, in a report to be sent to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 27 In addition, the Commission will send a copy of

the Report and Order, including this FRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA. A copy of the Report and Order and FRFA (or summaries thereof) will be also be published in the Federal
Register. 28

27 See 5 U. S. C. § 801( a)( 1)( A).
28 See 5 U. S. C. § 604( b).
116
Federal Communications Commission FCC 02- 298
117
APPENDIX C: COMMENTING PARTIES
Comments Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers

Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc. and the National Association of Broadcasters Association of America’s Public Television Stations and the Public Broadcasting Service
Comsearch Globalstar USA, Inc. and Globalstar, L. P.
Microwave Radio Communications, LLC National Spectrum Managers Association
Society of Broadcast Engineers, Inc. Winstar Communications, Inc.

Reply Comments Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers
Comsearch KNME- TV
Microwave Radio Communications, LLC National Spectrum Managers Association
National Telecommunications and Information Administration Red River Broadcast Co. LLC and KQDS Acquisition Corp.
Shure Incorporated Society of Broadcast Engineers, Inc.
Telecommunications Industry Association Viacom, Inc.

Ex Parte Presentations and Filings Microwave Radio Communications, LLC
National Translator Association Society of Broadcast Engineers, Inc.
117