United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 13-1280 September Term, 2013
FCC-78FR67956
Filed On: January 13, 2014
Securus Technologies, Inc.,
Petitioner
v.
Federal Communications Commission and
United States of America,
Respondents
------------------------------
Consolidated with 13-1281, 13-1291, 13-1300
BEFORE: Henderson, Brown,  and Srinivasan, Circuit Judges
*
O R D E R
Upon consideration of the motions for stay, the oppositions thereto, and the
replies, it is
ORDERED that the motions for stay be granted in part and denied in part.  The
following provisions of the Federal Communications Commission’s “Report and Order
and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,” FCC 13-113 (Sept. 26, 2013), are stayed
pending the court’s resolution of these petitions for review: 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.6010,
64.6020, and 64.6060.  With respect to these provisions, petitioners have satisfied the
stringent requirements for a stay pending court review.  See Winter v. Natural Res. Def.
Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal
Procedures 33 (2013).  It is
 Circuit Judge Brown would grant a stay of the entire rule.
*
USCA Case #13-1280      Document #1474764            Filed: 01/13/2014      Page 1 of 2
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
____________
No. 13-1280 September Term, 2013
FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the parties submit
proposed formats for the briefing of these cases within 30 days of the date of this order. 
The parties are strongly urged to submit a joint proposal and are reminded that the
court looks with extreme disfavor on repetitious submissions and will, where
appropriate, require a joint brief of aligned parties with total words not to exceed the
standard allotment for a single brief.  Whether the parties are aligned or have disparate
interests, they must provide detailed justifications for any request to file separate briefs
or to exceed in the aggregate the standard word allotment.  Requests to exceed the
standard word allotment must specify the word allotment necessary for each issue.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk 
BY: /s/
Timothy A. Ralls 
Deputy Clerk/LD
Page 2
USCA Case #13-1280      Document #1474764            Filed: 01/13/2014      Page 2 of 2