tinited~tates~enate WASHINGTON, DC 20510 June 27, 2011 Julius Genachowski Chairman Federal Communications Commission 445 li h Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Dear Chairman Genachowski, We support efforts to improve the Universal Service Fund ("USF") and help make affordable, reliable broadband a reality for Americans who have no access today. As you explore ways to modernize the USF, we urge you to consider reforms that are technology-neutral, make the most efficient use of USF dollars, and above all address the needs of unserved households. To that end, we ask that you consider the issues raised by the U.S. residential satellite broadband providers. These providers assert that satellite technology is a key means ofdelivering broadband to rural, unserved homes; seems very likely to undergo a major improvement in data rates as next-generation satellites are launched; and can be a cost-effective way to deploy residential broadband. We understand the Commission's proposed rules potentially exclude satellite broadband from meaningful participation in the "Connect America Fund," especially in Phase I ofthe program. Would you please explain the Commission's decision and how the proposed rules are technology neutral? What assumptions have been made in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with respect to next-generation satellite broadband capabilities and costs? We are concerned that removing a key technological platform from the program through eligibility rules may not be the best way to benefit consumers nor promote efficiency and control costs. Because it's in the public's interest to allow participation ofmultiple providers as part of the future of USF, we ask that you consider all technologies. Sincerely, Michael F. Bennet United States Senator Mark Udall United States Senator PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 0806